joether
Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze I also didn't, but I know both sides of the coin first hand, Europe with national health care and the US with some weird cowboy system where insurances can wangle out, deny you treatment... I don't need to go into the a right or a privilege issue, it's an economic question, how much does the state spend on people that have chronic illnesses which became chronic because they weren't screened or couldn't see a doctor, so therefore they are not able to work anymore and depend on social security? Prevention and early treatment is a lot cheaper... I'm going to try to dumb this down without losing the good stuff in the process. *NO* this is not to be insulting to you, LadyContanze or anyone else. The problem your speaking of with regards to US health care is just complex and complicated..... If a person has a chronic illness that could be fixed with surgery/other types of treatments, but cost more in the immediate time being, do we go in that direction? Long term, the patient would most likely not be affected by the problems, or would be minimalized. 'For-Profit' insurance companies and hospitals are less inclided to do so, as the chronic ill patient creates a longer term cash cow for them. Is it unethical? Of course it is! But again, this is all dumbed down on purpose; trying to fix this is even more amazingly....complex and complicated. And that too (fixing the issues creating the unethical actions) do not generate more profit for the companies, but create more expenses that reduce their net profit. And why are for-profit companies in existance kids? To MAKE MORE MONEY! Likewise, the rules and regulations are set to allow the chance to find the cure for cancer, and give the company that finds that information the ability to make huge profits. The question becomes one of REAL ethics. If your a medical doctor, do you keep the secret for curing cancer to millions of Americans to yourself and force patients to pay for it; or give it out freely? The problem is, doctors are not the ones making those kind of decisions and choices; its the 'The Suits' whom are generally governed by greed that do. And they'll make sure that all those within their company (and leave for a period of 'X' years afterward) can not talk about the cure without being so financially ruined as they'd be better off dead! Again, the question and concept you ask is very complex and complicated, that I do not think most people can rationally 'wrap their head around it' enough to handle the discussion. I dont understand it fully! But that which I do understand makes me disguested that such business practices are allowed to operated: Profitting off the Suffering of Others!
< Message edited by joether -- 5/26/2012 12:06:11 AM >
|