Time's Mark Halperin "Obama faces a grim new reality..."

Time's Mark Halperin "Obama faces a grim new reality..." (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

FatDomDaddy -> Time's Mark Halperin "Obama faces a grim new reality..." (6/7/2012 7:03:07 PM)
Republicans now believe Mitt Romney can win, and Democrats believe Obama can lose It's gonna be a long Summer! I wonder... If the President loses in November, will it be Bush's fault?

FirmhandKY -> RE: Time's Mark Halperin "Obama faces a grim new reality..." (6/7/2012 8:15:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy I wonder... If the President loses in November, will it be Bush's fault? Sure. But if not ... 1. Koch Brothers! 2. Out of State money. 3. Rigged electronic voting machines. 4. People voting against their own interests. 5. Recall elections never work out very well. 6. Outspent [8D] Firm

FatDomDaddy -> RE: Time's Mark Halperin "Obama faces a grim new reality..." (6/7/2012 8:26:25 PM)
I like this line "Last week's anemic job-creation and economic-growth data was sandwiched between two Bill Clinton specials: in one television interview, the 42nd President lauded Romney's business record as "sterling"; in another, he veered from the Obama line on the extension of Bush-era tax cuts" Did one of the forums left leaning posters say that Bubba was rallying the base???

Hillwilliam -> RE: Time's Mark Halperin "Obama faces a grim new reality..." (6/7/2012 8:47:38 PM)
I'm sitting here wondering if I've fallen into an alternate dimension. Conservatives lauding Clinton.[8D]

FatDomDaddy -> RE: Time's Mark Halperin "Obama faces a grim new reality..." (6/7/2012 9:00:10 PM)
Who's lauding Clinton? It is funny however, to see all the left leaners and Obama apologists pretend President Clinton's remarks are meaningless and/or meant to actually build support for President Obama's reelection.

servantforuse -> RE: Time's Mark Halperin "Obama faces a grim new reality..." (6/7/2012 9:10:41 PM)
Lets not forget about Wisconsin. 66 out of 72 counties voted to keep Scott Walker as Governor last Tuesday. Obama has a problem here.

Owner59 -> RE: Time's Mark Halperin "Obama faces a grim new reality..." (6/7/2012 9:33:37 PM)
Shake`n in our boots.......[:D] We`ll just let Mitt talk.......that`ll be all we need to do to win....... I have a hard time believing the cons all of a sudden like Mitt........[:D]

subrob1967 -> RE: Time's Mark Halperin "Obama faces a grim new reality..." (6/8/2012 7:25:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 Shake`n in our boots.......[:D] We`ll just let Mitt talk.......that`ll be all we need to do to win....... I have a hard time believing the cons all of a sudden like Mitt........[:D] You're kidding, right? Obama is the king of ah, uh, and um's. Backing Mitt is not the same as liking him, he was forced upon us by people like you, and is now the Republican candidate.

Owner59 -> RE: Time's Mark Halperin "Obama faces a grim new reality..." (6/8/2012 7:50:30 AM)
No......LOL!....it`s not the same thing.....lol......

Hillwilliam -> RE: Time's Mark Halperin "Obama faces a grim new reality..." (6/8/2012 8:03:52 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: subrob1967 quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 Shake`n in our boots.......[:D] We`ll just let Mitt talk.......that`ll be all we need to do to win....... I have a hard time believing the cons all of a sudden like Mitt........[:D] You're kidding, right? Obama is the king of ah, uh, and um's. Backing Mitt is not the same as liking him, he was forced upon us by people like you, and is now the Republican candidate. No, rob, he was forced upon us as a candidate because the alternative was stupid fucks like Perry, Santorum and Bachman. Seriously, how the hell can the liberals dictate who the Republican candidates are? The only thing that dictates who the Republican candidates are in the Republican leadership. If you want to blame someone, blame Priebus and his bunch of idiots.

Owner59 -> RE: Time's Mark Halperin "Obama faces a grim new reality..." (6/8/2012 8:27:23 AM)
1st of all,it was only the scared asses cons who thought President Obama was un-beatable. Truth be told...that hasn`t changed. They`re still as desperate as ever, have nothing to say/offer and that won`t be changing any-time soon. 2nd.....the election is 5 months and 15 lifetimes away.....anyone predicting victory or defeat is jerking themselves...... Those pre-gloating today are downright beating their meat blood red......[:D] The president won`t be suspending his campaign McCain style or panicking. He`ll calmly get back to work and do what`s he`s been doing all along. Beating the crap out of Mitt Rmoney.....

subrob1967 -> RE: Time's Mark Halperin "Obama faces a grim new reality..." (6/8/2012 8:55:56 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: subrob1967 quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 Shake`n in our boots.......[:D] We`ll just let Mitt talk.......that`ll be all we need to do to win....... I have a hard time believing the cons all of a sudden like Mitt........[:D] You're kidding, right? Obama is the king of ah, uh, and um's. Backing Mitt is not the same as liking him, he was forced upon us by people like you, and is now the Republican candidate. No, rob, he was forced upon us as a candidate because the alternative was stupid fucks like Perry, Santorum and Bachman. Seriously, how the hell can the liberals dictate who the Republican candidates are? The only thing that dictates who the Republican candidates are in the Republican leadership. If you want to blame someone, blame Priebus and his bunch of idiots. Um, you control the media, and those who control the media, control the message... It's not rocket science here Bill... Isn't it YOUR side whining about how much Walker spent to get his message out compared to Barrett?

mnottertail -> RE: Time's Mark Halperin "Obama faces a grim new reality..." (6/8/2012 9:51:36 AM)
not really, the robocalls and whatnot are all local, and regardless of how much neo-cons whine about the media, they own a vast share of it. So, outspending the same opponent in the original at a 3:1 ratio, this time he got lotsa out of area help and outspent him at a 10:1 (certainly 9+:1) and only slightly bettered the percentage of win. When two third-rate dogs fight, what's the real diff?

subrob1967 -> RE: Time's Mark Halperin "Obama faces a grim new reality..." (6/8/2012 10:22:51 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail not really, the robocalls and whatnot are all local, and regardless of how much neo-cons whine about the media, they own a vast share of it. So, outspending the same opponent in the original at a 3:1 ratio, this time he got lotsa out of area help and outspent him at a 10:1 (certainly 9+:1) and only slightly bettered the percentage of win. When two third-rate dogs fight, what's the real diff? A guy like Obama gets elected, that's the "diff".

mnottertail -> RE: Time's Mark Halperin "Obama faces a grim new reality..." (6/8/2012 10:25:04 AM)
Well, we will see if you can gather your rosebuds in 2016 rather than the 2012 assclowns you gathered.

subrob1967 -> RE: Time's Mark Halperin "Obama faces a grim new reality..." (6/8/2012 10:39:12 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Well, we will see if you can gather your rosebuds in 2016 rather than the 2012 assclowns you gathered. Your assclown isn't doing very well, you might not want to count that chicken before it hatches.

mnottertail -> RE: Time's Mark Halperin "Obama faces a grim new reality..." (6/8/2012 10:50:38 AM)
Well, in a race between third rates, but 'my assclown' as you call him, is doing better than 'your assclown'.

Hillwilliam -> RE: Time's Mark Halperin "Obama faces a grim new reality..." (6/8/2012 11:44:48 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: subrob1967 \ Um, you control the media, and those who control the media, control the message... It's not rocket science here Bill... Isn't it YOUR side whining about how much Walker spent to get his message out compared to Barrett? Why do you keep saying "you"? I havent said anything about Walker except I was surprised at the margin. Why do you personally seem to lack basic reading skills? It's not rocket science. The Right wing whines about the 'liberal leftist media" and has for 20 years but they OWN FOX news which, according to you, is the highest rated news media in the country. You contradict yourself. (unless you want to look truly uninformed and claim that Fox is lefty as well) Based on the last 3+ years, the Republicans could have this election in a walkover not seen since Reagan over Carter. What did they do? Did they find a statesman (or woman) to get the country out of the mess left by 11 years of mismanagement? Fuck no. They picked a crazy old man, a bunch of ignorant Bible Beaters and the photogenic king of flip flops. THATS what I had to choose from in the primary. Don't blame the left leaning media types on the utter stupidity of the RNC. If they can't oversome a few bad reviews then they're even more ineffectual that I thought they were.

Hillwilliam -> RE: Time's Mark Halperin "Obama faces a grim new reality..." (6/8/2012 11:47:09 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: subrob1967 quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail not really, the robocalls and whatnot are all local, and regardless of how much neo-cons whine about the media, they own a vast share of it. So, outspending the same opponent in the original at a 3:1 ratio, this time he got lotsa out of area help and outspent him at a 10:1 (certainly 9+:1) and only slightly bettered the percentage of win. When two third-rate dogs fight, what's the real diff? A guy like Obama gets elected, that's the "diff". Then pick someone besides the aforementioned "Crazy old man, Ignorant Bible beaters or incredibly photogenic king of flip flops" to run against him.

subrob1967 -> RE: Time's Mark Halperin "Obama faces a grim new reality..." (6/8/2012 1:41:44 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: subrob1967 \ Um, you control the media, and those who control the media, control the message... It's not rocket science here Bill... Isn't it YOUR side whining about how much Walker spent to get his message out compared to Barrett? Why do you keep saying "you"? I havent said anything about Walker except I was surprised at the margin. Why do you personally seem to lack basic reading skills? It's not rocket science. The Right wing whines about the 'liberal leftist media" and has for 20 years but they OWN FOX news which, according to you, is the highest rated news media in the country. You contradict yourself. (unless you want to look truly uninformed and claim that Fox is lefty as well) Based on the last 3+ years, the Republicans could have this election in a walkover not seen since Reagan over Carter. What did they do? Did they find a statesman (or woman) to get the country out of the mess left by 11 years of mismanagement? Fuck no. They picked a crazy old man, a bunch of ignorant Bible Beaters and the photogenic king of flip flops. THATS what I had to choose from in the primary. Don't blame the left leaning media types on the utter stupidity of the RNC. If they can't oversome a few bad reviews then they're even more ineffectual that I thought they were. Are you not a liberal who switched sides because the republicans left you? Didn't you vote for Obama? So Fox is one of many networks, just because they have the highest ratings doesn't make them the ONLY source for news... Plenty of people around here cite MSNBC, CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNBC, Huffington Post, Daily Koz, and The Daily Show... That's what? 9-1, or according to whiny liberals, the same total Walker outspent Barrett by. Now, if you didn't I apologize right here, right now, but if you did vote for Obama, no matter what your reasoning is, my including you in the you, is accurate, despite my statement being quite Clintonesque.[:-] It was you who asked the question, don't whine about the answer I gave you... You could have completely ignored my statement, and avoided this whole thing.

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875