LaTigresse
Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: RaspberryLemon Interesting post, BitaTruble! In this context, I would say... Authority is the practical application of power. Without power, one can only have superficial authority. Without authority, power is merely potential. To have both is to be in control. The two concepts work hand in hand. I agree with this very much. I would be curious to understand Aries concept of the terms, as to understand how he disagrees. I think we've all seen examples of authority without power. I saw it multiple times in people in the military. I've seen it many times in the work force. People that have been given authority but are not leaders. They have no personal power and those being forced to 'serve' them know it, and resent them for it. Then you have the flip side, a person with power, but no authority. While it's frustrating at times to be that person, personally, I would rather be in this situation. It's been my experience that, with power, the authority will come. I am banking on it in my career change. Power will be recognized always, and honoured, IF the person with it is honourable. It doesn't have to shout itself from the mountain tops, it doesn't have to self promote. It can be had by the quietest, most seemingly, at first glance, meek of souls. Just look at the examples given above. Jesus and Ghandi. It is probable (I've not met either...) that they didn't self promote their power. I think they were both pretty focused on other things. Both had a power/charisma that, because they were honourable men, inspired others to relinquish authority and follow. It is that way with all great leaders.
_____________________________
My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one! Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!
|