RE: 255 to 67 vs. Holder (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message

farglebargle -> RE: 255 to 67 vs. Holder (6/29/2012 6:17:34 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Executive priveledge is for the executive branch, not to protect is bro in the judiciary branch. Makes you wonder just what Obama is covering up.


Um... DOJ *IS* executive branch. Maybe you need a civics refresher?



farglebargle -> RE: 255 to 67 vs. Holder (6/29/2012 6:19:22 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Executive priveledge is for the executive branch, not to protect is bro in the judiciary branch. Makes you wonder just what Obama is covering up.


Makes reasonable people wonder, anyway.

[image]local://upfiles/292349/06FF13E2A29947DD8DC4DDC58548CF11.jpg[/image]



Excepting, of course, that no guns were walked anywhere, and that DOJ was hamstrung by the NRA's LEGISLATION allowing anyone to buy and transfer guns without effective oversight.

Otherwise, for being completely incorrect in every respect, it's not a bad cartoon.



Sanity -> RE: 255 to 67 vs. Holder (6/29/2012 7:24:20 AM)


...which, THAT would explain why so many Dems voted to hold Holder in contempt

This is all the NRAs fault... and Holder isnt withholding documentation in contempt of congress at all

It just looks that way [8|]

We all need farglebargle glasses to see the real truth here I suppose [:D]

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Excepting, of course, that no guns were walked anywhere, and that DOJ was hamstrung by the NRA's LEGISLATION allowing anyone to buy and transfer guns without effective oversight.

Otherwise, for being completely incorrect in every respect, it's not a bad cartoon.




Owner59 -> RE: 255 to 67 vs. Holder (6/29/2012 7:37:44 AM)

[sm=lalala.gif]



Sanity -> RE: 255 to 67 vs. Holder (6/29/2012 2:06:00 PM)


Holder: "I am not a crook"

"Therefore I wont prosecute me..."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/29/after-holder-contempt-vote-republicans-eye-civil-court-case-to-extract-furious/

[image]local://upfiles/292349/CD5B6A093E4A40CBA81CF005A16F7AA4.jpg[/image]



mnottertail -> RE: 255 to 67 vs. Holder (6/29/2012 2:10:26 PM)

lol.  I love it, the ineptitude of the right.  I just dont know how they could be any more pathetic.



Lucylastic -> RE: 255 to 67 vs. Holder (6/29/2012 2:13:21 PM)

OH I think the last few days have proved they can get a lot more pathetic.



slvemike4u -> RE: 255 to 67 vs. Holder (6/29/2012 2:15:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Executive priveledge is for the executive branch, not to protect is bro in the judiciary branch. Makes you wonder just what Obama is covering up.

What were you saying about bigots servant ?



mnottertail -> RE: 255 to 67 vs. Holder (6/29/2012 2:24:46 PM)

LOL, and he sticks up a Nixon reminder.  Hey, that was a republican, of course he was a crook.

From the Faux Nuze article:
 
A department official told Fox News the letter was "pro forma" -- or a formality -- considering that ex-Attorney General Michael Mukasey in 2008 also refused to refer two Bush White House aides to a grand jury after they were held in contempt. 





Sanity -> RE: 255 to 67 vs. Holder (6/29/2012 2:36:07 PM)


No one died in Watergate

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

LOL, and he sticks up a Nixon reminder.  Hey, that was a republican, of course he was a crook.

From the Faux Nuze article:
 
A department official told Fox News the letter was "pro forma" -- or a formality -- considering that ex-Attorney General Michael Mukasey in 2008 also refused to refer two Bush White House aides to a grand jury after they were held in contempt. 







mnottertail -> RE: 255 to 67 vs. Holder (6/29/2012 2:41:37 PM)

When you bring up cheney, w, rumsfeld, rice et al for treason, you wont look so hypocritical.

Lotta people died and were maimed in Iraq. 

(and as an aside, no republicans died in the Minneapolis Airport Bathroom that day)



Sanity -> RE: 255 to 67 vs. Holder (6/29/2012 2:48:12 PM)


Its going to be a long hot summer for this lawless administration.

They claimed under oath that they didnt know.

But guess what... They knew. [;)]



[image]local://upfiles/292349/8E9252052B794308B4B829B9AC1C1889.jpg[/image]



mnottertail -> RE: 255 to 67 vs. Holder (6/29/2012 2:49:35 PM)

drudge report?  LOL. get some credible citation that has something meaningful at least once in your life.  

you are a laughingstock.



thompsonx -> RE: 255 to 67 vs. Holder (6/29/2012 2:53:06 PM)

quote:

And its Holder, the head of the Justice Department, who is covering up the facts concerning the Fast and Furious operation our government (ATF agents) gave Mexican terrorists thousands of weapons illegally


Would you have any validation for this insipid moronic tripe?



mnottertail -> RE: 255 to 67 vs. Holder (6/29/2012 2:56:38 PM)

Well, he has Issa (in an act reminiscent of Tailgunner Joe) yesterday on the house floor inserting a document that is illegal to make public into the record (which will be redacted for publication).

So, sorta like waving the paper and saying I have a list of 200 communists in the state department, simply impugnations.  I watched the whole performance yesterday. 



thompsonx -> RE: 255 to 67 vs. Holder (6/29/2012 3:09:58 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Well, he has Issa (in an act reminiscent of Tailgunner Joe) yesterday on the house floor inserting a document that is illegal to make public into the record (which will be redacted for publication).

So, sorta like waving the paper and saying I have a list of 200 communists in the state department, simply impugnations.  I watched the whole performance yesterday. 



I found this this morning.
The source,fortune, is not exactly a bastion of liberal thought.

http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2012/06/27/fast-and-furious-truth/?iid=obnetwork






farglebargle -> RE: 255 to 67 vs. Holder (6/29/2012 4:32:39 PM)

That Fortune article is worth reading.



Sanity -> RE: 255 to 67 vs. Holder (6/29/2012 5:14:26 PM)


Just for you mnot:

quote:

THANKS FOR MAKING YESTERDAY 2ND BIGGEST DAY IN DRUDGEREPORT'S 17 YEAR HISTORY! PAGE WAS VIEWED 45,233,974 TIMES, FROM 115 COUNTIRES...

http://www.drudgereport.com/


Far left CNN has what... 55,000 viewers at 10:00?


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

drudge report?  LOL. get some credible citation that has something meaningful at least once in your life.  

you are a laughingstock.







TheHeretic -> RE: 255 to 67 vs. Holder (6/29/2012 5:58:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

(and as an aside, no republicans died in the Minneapolis Airport Bathroom that day)



And as a further aside, Ron, why does a Republican up to something consensual bother you so much, yet you never seem to mention that the last Congressional sex scandal was a Democrat who raped a teenager in her own home?




Owner59 -> RE: 255 to 67 vs. Holder (6/29/2012 6:13:52 PM)

Calm down there, buddy.[;)]


Save yer` powder for the election......[:D]


What does the crime that wide-standing-con was arrested for, have to do w/ consent?


Never mind.......




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
5.078125E-02