RE: Poll: Obama would handle invading aliens better than Mitt Romney (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Musicmystery -> RE: Poll: Obama would handle invading aliens better than Mitt Romney (6/30/2012 10:07:53 PM)

Oh. I didn't realize alien travel relied on fossil fuels.

My mistake. Thanks for the education.

I figured feasible travel over those distances would require something remarkably different. Thanks for 'spailin' it.

I also figured the capacity for amazing planet-destructing ability would depend greatly on what that advanced technology might be. I didn't get that all technology is powerfully destructive.

Wow. I'm learning so much!!!





TheHeretic -> RE: Poll: Obama would handle invading aliens better than Mitt Romney (6/30/2012 10:26:26 PM)

And again with the planetary destruction crap, and an obtuse refusal to see analogies in use.

Maybe you should claim it was just a joke, or put the discussion off until after the holidays?




Musicmystery -> RE: Poll: Obama would handle invading aliens better than Mitt Romney (6/30/2012 10:40:31 PM)

Well, since you're now objecting to the point you objected to, my challenging the "planetary destruction crap," then it seems you've wandered off into your own universe.

Have a nice trip.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZ-lSTlUnfA




TheHeretic -> RE: Poll: Obama would handle invading aliens better than Mitt Romney (6/30/2012 11:37:38 PM)

The only one talking about planetary destruction here, is you, Muse, and it's getting obvious that you'd rather do that, than just admit you shot off an arrogant snark without noting the barrel was pointed at your own foot.

Now you want to condescend your way out of it. Sorry dude. SOL





Moonhead -> RE: Poll: Obama would handle invading aliens better than Mitt Romney (7/1/2012 5:11:05 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

IF a space faring culture had the ability to cross interstellar distances to come to Earth in the first place, they have a higher technology than we do.

This means they have the ability to wipe us out without much of a bother.


No it doesn't.



And how do reach that conclusion, Muse? Jlf's statement is correct, and what he expresses is self-evident. Crossing interstellar space requires controlling the release of vast amounts of energy, within the parameters of safe operation. To know what those are requires knowing what happens when they are exceeded. Or, if you don't like bombs that use the same energy source as their drive, having the ability to move a ship across interstellar space means they have the ability to just throw a million mph (whatever) rock at the planet, and time their own arrival for after the atmosphere starts clearing up.

Now whether they actually have the desire to wipe us out is not so easily assumed, and they might have reasons which precluded such action. Maybe they want us for slaves, or food. Maybe they don't give us any more thought than we give an anthill in the path of a new sidewalk, or want the surface resources undamaged. Maybe, as someone pointed out, they are from the La planet, of the Shangri system, coming to gently bestow their benevolent wisdom, and sprinkle "can we all get along" dust over our water supplies.

If they can get here across interstellar space, then they can make sure nobody is home when they land, if that is what they wish to do. What's hard?



Nothing's "hard" about it; nothing is demonstrated. It's an assumption, not a foregone conclusion. We sent men to the moon; did we have the ability to destroy it? It's pretty big. They are possible, but not inherently, joined skills.

Imagine, for example, space travel done through dimensional jumping. That just brings them here, not with means to destroy us. Nor is energy infinite--the distance could be the limits of their power, leaving none to use on destruction even if they wanted to.

Does anyone learn logic anymore?



No, but I did learn enough physics to know that the notion of dimension jumping is ridiculous nonsense that won't work outside of an episode of Doctor Who.




atursvcMaam -> RE: Poll: Obama would handle invading aliens better than Mitt Romney (7/1/2012 6:51:59 AM)

Awww crap, i thought all the birther stuff, the lack of educational history and the made up stuff in his bio was because Mr Obama was not of this planet. Another Kook theory shot to hell, i guess.




Musicmystery -> RE: Poll: Obama would handle invading aliens better than Mitt Romney (7/1/2012 6:54:43 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

IF a space faring culture had the ability to cross interstellar distances to come to Earth in the first place, they have a higher technology than we do.

This means they have the ability to wipe us out without much of a bother.


No it doesn't.



And how do reach that conclusion, Muse? Jlf's statement is correct, and what he expresses is self-evident. Crossing interstellar space requires controlling the release of vast amounts of energy, within the parameters of safe operation. To know what those are requires knowing what happens when they are exceeded. Or, if you don't like bombs that use the same energy source as their drive, having the ability to move a ship across interstellar space means they have the ability to just throw a million mph (whatever) rock at the planet, and time their own arrival for after the atmosphere starts clearing up.

Now whether they actually have the desire to wipe us out is not so easily assumed, and they might have reasons which precluded such action. Maybe they want us for slaves, or food. Maybe they don't give us any more thought than we give an anthill in the path of a new sidewalk, or want the surface resources undamaged. Maybe, as someone pointed out, they are from the La planet, of the Shangri system, coming to gently bestow their benevolent wisdom, and sprinkle "can we all get along" dust over our water supplies.

If they can get here across interstellar space, then they can make sure nobody is home when they land, if that is what they wish to do. What's hard?



Nothing's "hard" about it; nothing is demonstrated. It's an assumption, not a foregone conclusion. We sent men to the moon; did we have the ability to destroy it? It's pretty big. They are possible, but not inherently, joined skills.

Imagine, for example, space travel done through dimensional jumping. That just brings them here, not with means to destroy us. Nor is energy infinite--the distance could be the limits of their power, leaving none to use on destruction even if they wanted to.

Does anyone learn logic anymore?



No, but I did learn enough physics to know that the notion of dimension jumping is ridiculous nonsense that won't work outside of an episode of Doctor Who.

And yet invading aliens is A-Okay.

[8|]




Musicmystery -> RE: Poll: Obama would handle invading aliens better than Mitt Romney (7/1/2012 6:58:21 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

The only one talking about planetary destruction here, is you, Muse, and it's getting obvious that you'd rather do that, than just admit you shot off an arrogant snark without noting the barrel was pointed at your own foot.

Now you want to condescend your way out of it. Sorry dude. SOL



Sorry, Rich, I'm not----it's right from the OP, and it's the point you jumped on.

Jesus fucking Christ--it's thread about aliens, FFS.

Learn to lighten up.


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

IF a space faring culture had the ability to cross interstellar distances to come to Earth in the first place, they have a higher technology than we do.

This means they have the ability to wipe us out without much of a bother.


No it doesn't.



And how do reach that conclusion, Muse? Jlf's statement is correct, and what he expresses is self-evident. Crossing interstellar space requires controlling the release of vast amounts of energy, within the parameters of safe operation. To know what those are requires knowing what happens when they are exceeded. Or, if you don't like bombs that use the same energy source as their drive, having the ability to move a ship across interstellar space means they have the ability to just throw a million mph (whatever) rock at the planet, and time their own arrival for after the atmosphere starts clearing up.

Now whether they actually have the desire to wipe us out is not so easily assumed, and they might have reasons which precluded such action. Maybe they want us for slaves, or food. Maybe they don't give us any more thought than we give an anthill in the path of a new sidewalk, or want the surface resources undamaged. Maybe, as someone pointed out, they are from the La planet, of the Shangri system, coming to gently bestow their benevolent wisdom, and sprinkle "can we all get along" dust over our water supplies.

If they can get here across interstellar space, then they can make sure nobody is home when they land, if that is what they wish to do. What's hard?







TheHeretic -> RE: Poll: Obama would handle invading aliens better than Mitt Romney (7/1/2012 7:22:56 AM)

And as pointed out, Muse, wiping out a fragile species of surface dwellers is a long and far cry from destroying a planet.

Perhaps you missed it, but this was intended as a lighthearted thread, on a highly speculative subject. Unless you are emotionally invested in the religious tenet that God made us in His own image, and we are therefore unique and especially blessed by His awesomeness, then we ain't special, and the odds are mighty long that we aren't alone, and I personally hope, not the best and brightest the entire universe has to offer.





Moonhead -> RE: Poll: Obama would handle invading aliens better than Mitt Romney (7/1/2012 7:53:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

IF a space faring culture had the ability to cross interstellar distances to come to Earth in the first place, they have a higher technology than we do.

This means they have the ability to wipe us out without much of a bother.


No it doesn't.



And how do reach that conclusion, Muse? Jlf's statement is correct, and what he expresses is self-evident. Crossing interstellar space requires controlling the release of vast amounts of energy, within the parameters of safe operation. To know what those are requires knowing what happens when they are exceeded. Or, if you don't like bombs that use the same energy source as their drive, having the ability to move a ship across interstellar space means they have the ability to just throw a million mph (whatever) rock at the planet, and time their own arrival for after the atmosphere starts clearing up.

Now whether they actually have the desire to wipe us out is not so easily assumed, and they might have reasons which precluded such action. Maybe they want us for slaves, or food. Maybe they don't give us any more thought than we give an anthill in the path of a new sidewalk, or want the surface resources undamaged. Maybe, as someone pointed out, they are from the La planet, of the Shangri system, coming to gently bestow their benevolent wisdom, and sprinkle "can we all get along" dust over our water supplies.

If they can get here across interstellar space, then they can make sure nobody is home when they land, if that is what they wish to do. What's hard?



Nothing's "hard" about it; nothing is demonstrated. It's an assumption, not a foregone conclusion. We sent men to the moon; did we have the ability to destroy it? It's pretty big. They are possible, but not inherently, joined skills.

Imagine, for example, space travel done through dimensional jumping. That just brings them here, not with means to destroy us. Nor is energy infinite--the distance could be the limits of their power, leaving none to use on destruction even if they wanted to.

Does anyone learn logic anymore?



No, but I did learn enough physics to know that the notion of dimension jumping is ridiculous nonsense that won't work outside of an episode of Doctor Who.

And yet invading aliens is A-Okay.

[8|]

That's completely daft as well, but at least it could be arranged in a way that doesn't break any laws of physics.
[;)]




Musicmystery -> RE: Poll: Obama would handle invading aliens better than Mitt Romney (7/1/2012 8:06:41 AM)

I didn't realize that wild speculation had such hard and fast rules.




Moonhead -> RE: Poll: Obama would handle invading aliens better than Mitt Romney (7/1/2012 8:11:44 AM)

The distinction between the impossible and the theoretically possible but bloody unlikely is a pretty solid boundary, you'll find.




Musicmystery -> RE: Poll: Obama would handle invading aliens better than Mitt Romney (7/1/2012 8:14:32 AM)

People even have hard lines about fantasy now.

Fun is a lot harder than it used to be.




Moonhead -> RE: Poll: Obama would handle invading aliens better than Mitt Romney (7/1/2012 8:18:31 AM)

Well, perhaps you should have remembered that before you started quibbling and naysaying somebody else's comment about the likelihood of invading aliens having better technology than we do then, shouldn't you?




Musicmystery -> RE: Poll: Obama would handle invading aliens better than Mitt Romney (7/1/2012 8:24:04 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Well, perhaps you should have remembered that before you started quibbling and naysaying somebody else's comment about the likelihood of invading aliens having better technology than we do then, shouldn't you?

I simply pointed out that travel doesn't necessarily mean ability to destroy with ease. Period.

I didn't realize that was a given assumption in the Alien Fantasy Handbook.

You guys take this FAR too seriously.




TheHeretic -> RE: Poll: Obama would handle invading aliens better than Mitt Romney (7/1/2012 8:30:57 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Fun is a lot harder than it used to be.



Which brings us back to, it seems like you ain't been laid in a while.




Musicmystery -> RE: Poll: Obama would handle invading aliens better than Mitt Romney (7/1/2012 8:33:31 AM)

You're the dude with nothing better to do than pile on. I just pointed out an unsupported assumption.

I'm surprised no one's jumped in complaining that the government shouldn't be handling alien invasions.




Owner59 -> RE: Poll: Obama would handle invading aliens better than Mitt Romney (7/1/2012 8:34:15 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

And as pointed out, Muse, wiping out a fragile species of surface dwellers is a long and far cry from destroying a planet.

Perhaps you missed it, but this was intended as a lighthearted thread, on a highly speculative subject. Unless you are emotionally invested in the religious tenet that God made us in His own image, and we are therefore unique and especially blessed by His awesomeness, then we ain't special, and the odds are mighty long that we aren't alone, and I personally hope, not the best and brightest the entire universe has to offer.




That`s a good point......after we and a few thousand other higher species(give or take) are wiped out.....there will be fish(mammals?....eh?) and plenty of bugs alive and live`n large......[8|]




Moonhead -> RE: Poll: Obama would handle invading aliens better than Mitt Romney (7/1/2012 8:42:49 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
I simply pointed out that travel doesn't necessarily mean ability to destroy with ease. Period.

I didn't realize that was a given assumption in the Alien Fantasy Handbook.

You guys take this FAR too seriously.

The latter's a common problem among science fiction nerds and/or writers, you'll find.
[;)]
As was pointed out initially though, if somebody has a method of travel that lets them cross interstellar distances, then they won't have any problem weaponising that if necessary. The example that was given (of using whatever sort of method they use to move their spacecraft about to shove asteroids into our gravity well on a trajectory where they'll hit something important) wouldn't even involve any retooling of their machinery, and would be absolutely devastating. That would be pretty damned easy for somebody who was up there with a stardrive going spare, would it not?




Musicmystery -> RE: Poll: Obama would handle invading aliens better than Mitt Romney (7/1/2012 8:45:34 AM)

If you say so. I'm not up on the latest alien technology, or that it would have to follow what we already know or can imagine.

Probably they have an iPhone app that just does the job.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875