Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Love is not necessary M/s relationship


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Love is not necessary M/s relationship Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Love is not necessary M/s relationship - 7/11/2012 6:45:41 AM   
pyschosubmission


Posts: 1109
Joined: 7/6/2012
From: Glasgow, Scotland
Status: offline
You're welcome! Always thought the Greeks got it right when they come up with different names for "Love", for such an important collection of emotions, it's just inescapably vague

_____________________________

Comedian, kinkster, all round malingerer

Lord Pish of Talkingshite
First Member-At-Large, ProSubs"R"Us

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Love is not necessary M/s relationship - 7/11/2012 8:11:18 AM   
Kana


Posts: 6676
Joined: 10/24/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml

To the OP...

This is how adults can disagree.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kana


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dresproperty

I know love is not necessary for every M/s relationship but for me it is necessary. I prefer a 24/7 TPE and for me that level of dynamic needs love, trust, honesty, loyalty and respect. I cant see that happening in a dynamic with no emotional attachment. YMMV.

My experience was the exact opposite. The only real way I can function in a bound relationship w/o emotional attachment (Note-I ain't talking bout play, but relationships) is within the boundaries of a strict TPE where I am the owner and she is property.
The structure, and strictures, made it easier for me to detach.


I've had relationships that were purely about the D/s and where love didn't even come into the equation. Now, in most of those respect and affection played a role, but I've had a couple where even those weren't on the table.

Personally - I'm looking for love, mutual respect, and a shit load of D/s, and sure you can claim that my preferences are invalid, but if you do, I'll just assume you're a cunt.

You can state that you have a different perspective, different needs and wants, and that while my preferences are not yours, they're not invalid. And if you do, I'll assume that you're not a cunt.


Does a happy dance, CML just gave me a promotion to adult!
Yea for meeeeeeee's.

And on a serious note, thanks. I try to write these things in such a way that others aren't offended, that open things up for discussion, and certainly can't be taken personally.
In other words, debate like grown ups should.
It's nice to have the effort noted.

_____________________________

"One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die. "
HST

(in reply to crazyml)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Love is not necessary M/s relationship - 7/11/2012 1:09:48 PM   
dublinemma


Posts: 57
Joined: 9/10/2010
Status: offline
Whilst I don't think you have to be have love to be in a M/s relationship I can see how it might improve the realtionship. For me, trust comes with love, being able to tell someone your deepest darkest desires and fantasies without fear of judgement can be an integral part in any relationship. I think without love the relationship is simply just that of an owner and property and for some people that does work, however, I would wonder how much of yourself you will really reveal without feelings involved! Just my humble opinion :P

(in reply to Kana)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Love is not necessary M/s relationship - 7/11/2012 2:27:13 PM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline
Two things brother Kana,

Firstly, I'm really having trouble picturing your "happy dance"...

Secondly, if in being snarky to one poster I should accidentally be nice about another can we just all agree that it's collateral praisage?

_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to Kana)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Love is not necessary M/s relationship - 8/10/2012 1:49:35 AM   
TarynsSlave


Posts: 16
Status: offline
I do understand the argument that love may not necessarily be a must for M/s. There are plenty of fine examples of folks living like this and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that... whatever floats your boat!

Personally, love is a big part of my life as a slave. I consider myself to be both a lover and a slave and would not have entered a 24/7 TPE relationship without first being very much in love with my then live-in girlfriend, now Mistress and Owner

(in reply to OsideGirl)
Profile   Post #: 45
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Love is not necessary M/s relationship Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.063