RE: Is being a Pro/FinDomme the only way to test a prospective submissives authenticity? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


TNDommeK -> RE: Is being a Pro/FinDomme the only way to test a prospective submissives authenticity? (7/11/2012 7:00:39 PM)

I would say as far as online goes, I require tribute for My time. Meaning, I have had conversations with people to see if our interests are the same or if they can even afford My services. I wouldn't require tribute to exchange correspondence for the first time. Not now anyway, when I was younger and stupid I might have,lol. They can show themselves to Me on cam to prove they are a real person, but as far as how dedicated they are to really wanting to serve Me, well that is to be seen and is totally up to them.




OneKinkyArtist -> RE: Is being a Pro/FinDomme the only way to test a prospective submissives authenticity? (7/11/2012 7:14:04 PM)

being a grammer Nazi doesn't get my question answered




ReMakeYou -> RE: Is being a Pro/FinDomme the only way to test a prospective submissives authenticity? (7/11/2012 8:02:00 PM)

Think about it this way. If you met a girl on here who seemed great, but needed you to front her some cash to get her out of Nigeria, what would you do?

Have the same attitude towards girls who seem great, but demand tribute before they'll take you seriously.

(Not that I've seen a findomme who gave off a personality beyond her D/s self, but since neither of us would match well with the other, the point is moot.)

As for why there are so many of them, ask yourself who wouldn't be tempted by the prospect of free money.




NiceButMeanGirl -> RE: Is being a Pro/FinDomme the only way to test a prospective submissives authenticity? (7/11/2012 8:31:17 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

I'm afraid I'm not the one to help you with this. I don't gauge a person's potential as a submissive by money they can send Me. Generally, My first engagement with someone is to tell them what munch I will be at next. If they don't have a scheduling conflict, I expect them to show up.

I do watch how people treat the wait staff. I notice if he checks the level of My drink during the meal. If there is a play party following, I see how he treats others there as well. The person gets bonus points if they offer to help out in some way, making sure that I don't mind if he goes to do so. I look for stuff like opening doors for Me, asking Me if there is something in particular that I would like him to do, etc.

The money thing has just never been a part of My evaluation.

This. ^^^^ I totally agree and I'm the same way. I've never considered asking for or accepting money at all. I do watch how they act and treat other people though.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Privileged
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit
quote:

ORIGINAL: Privileged
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit
...Starting out proving someone has the money to send, doesn't mean they are willing or good at anything other than sending some money.

No lie detected.

I expect tribute on contact if I'm approached via messenger. If a sub doesn't adhere to that rule, it says something about his character. Not necessarily his "authenticity"

Because I am a nitpicker extraordinaire, I have to say I don't see any service offers in your profile. Perhaps an edit is in order?

Excuse me?

I quoted your reply and said "no lie detected" meaning, true/fact/I agree. The rest was to the OP.

I have to admit that, when I first read that response, I wondered why you were talking to Lockit like she's a sub because she's NOT. You didn't clarify that you changed horses in mid-stream there.

NBMG




DarkSteven -> RE: Is being a Pro/FinDomme the only way to test a prospective submissives authenticity? (7/11/2012 8:31:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: OneKinkyArtist

I ask this question as I peruse through the dommes in my city that pique my interest and what I find is that all of the ones Ive seen are professional or financial Dominants.


So there are no lifestyle Dommes you find attractive, only the pros?

Any ideas why that might be?




seekingOwnertoo -> RE: Is being a Pro/FinDomme the only way to test a prospective submissives authenticity? (7/11/2012 8:36:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: OneKinkyArtist

I ask this question as I peruse through the dommes in my city that pique my interest and what I find is that all of the ones Ive seen are professional or financial Dominants. Now while I cant knock what the next person does I can say that I am at a lost for words on how disheartening it is for that to be so. I fancy myself a honest and true person , yet it is hard to find a Female Dominant when you dont have the money to allow them to control. I have many other uses both sexully and non sexually that I feel could be of major use. COuld anyone help me under stand this "phenomenon"


Yes, I can explain it.. But understand it is from my perspective. Which of course, is highly slanted toward my personal Experience.

1. Collar Me is a free site. There is no cost, or skin in the game, to post a profile here. So every voyeur does. So does every con artist … some of them convicted.

2. There are people who make money selling the "how to scam online" routine. Ten years ago there were trail blazers in this regard, now the scams are fairly ubiquitous, and not so unique. Some are even men, mascaraing as women; or a couple, with the woman making phone calls.

3. How to scam men, 101, teaches the easiest way is to pose as a Domme. Men will send money on the “tribute to prove you are sincere routine”. And when they realize the Domme is … collecting the money with nothing required, the man will not report it to the authorities, because he is afraid of his personal reputation.

Conclusion: never pay money unless You are meeting a Pro Domme in person. There ARE a few legit ones here. But they are hard to find among the cons and thieves. A good Pro Domme is a real Dominant Lady. One who as a child had Her Barbie, whipping Her ken doll! ROFL Hint: Good Pro's want to talk to you on the phone, before making a "date". (No tribute required!) And trust me on this, i HAVE met some of the "Most Renowned" in the Land! [;)]

Had to add .. i met a local Pro Domme a couple months ago. She met ME for DINNER at a nice restaurant. We had a great conversation, and of course, I declined a date for future "play", for reasons we need not post. But the point is ... it did not cost me anything, other than Dinner at a nice restaurant. And a few non Pro's I know, have have the same ... treat! [;)] Just a typical night out, is my best description.

Best conclusion though: Go to munches or other events. While I don’t frequent them, even Pro Dommes have told me at some, there are more Women than men. And THAT is a nice ratio that I would favor, as a single man! ROFL

Yet always treat a Domme You meet as a Lady. Be classy and ask about Her. Just as you would a vanilla girl. It will get you a LOT farther. :-)

Good luck!





TNDommeK -> RE: Is being a Pro/FinDomme the only way to test a prospective submissives authenticity? (7/11/2012 9:03:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: OneKinkyArtist

being a grammer Nazi doesn't get my question answered



??




Privileged -> RE: Is being a Pro/FinDomme the only way to test a prospective submissives authenticity? (7/11/2012 9:12:17 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: NiceButMeanGirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

I'm afraid I'm not the one to help you with this. I don't gauge a person's potential as a submissive by money they can send Me. Generally, My first engagement with someone is to tell them what munch I will be at next. If they don't have a scheduling conflict, I expect them to show up.

I do watch how people treat the wait staff. I notice if he checks the level of My drink during the meal. If there is a play party following, I see how he treats others there as well. The person gets bonus points if they offer to help out in some way, making sure that I don't mind if he goes to do so. I look for stuff like opening doors for Me, asking Me if there is something in particular that I would like him to do, etc.

The money thing has just never been a part of My evaluation.

This. ^^^^ I totally agree and I'm the same way. I've never considered asking for or accepting money at all. I do watch how they act and treat other people though.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Privileged
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit
quote:

ORIGINAL: Privileged
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit
...Starting out proving someone has the money to send, doesn't mean they are willing or good at anything other than sending some money.

No lie detected.

I expect tribute on contact if I'm approached via messenger. If a sub doesn't adhere to that rule, it says something about his character. Not necessarily his "authenticity"

Because I am a nitpicker extraordinaire, I have to say I don't see any service offers in your profile. Perhaps an edit is in order?

Excuse me?

I quoted your reply and said "no lie detected" meaning, true/fact/I agree. The rest was to the OP.

I have to admit that, when I first read that response, I wondered why you were talking to Lockit like she's a sub because she's NOT. You didn't clarify that you changed horses in mid-stream there.

NBMG


She didn't think the latter message applied to her. She attacked me for the observation/suggestion I posted.
Why? I suppose I'll never know.




LadyHibiscus -> RE: Is being a Pro/FinDomme the only way to test a prospective submissives authenticity? (7/11/2012 9:27:20 PM)

Privileged, I had a hard time understanding what you were saying, and who it was directed to. Slang doesn't always translate well, even when it's explained.




NiceButMeanGirl -> RE: Is being a Pro/FinDomme the only way to test a prospective submissives authenticity? (7/11/2012 9:40:44 PM)

Totally. [8|]




Privileged -> RE: Is being a Pro/FinDomme the only way to test a prospective submissives authenticity? (7/11/2012 9:51:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus

Privileged, I had a hard time understanding what you were saying, and who it was directed to. Slang doesn't always translate well, even when it's explained.


Understandable but, after reading everything she said after I explained, do you think slang is the issue?




OneKinkyArtist -> RE: Is being a Pro/FinDomme the only way to test a prospective submissives authenticity? (7/11/2012 9:52:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven


quote:

ORIGINAL: OneKinkyArtist

I ask this question as I peruse through the dommes in my city that pique my interest and what I find is that all of the ones Ive seen are professional or financial Dominants.


So there are no lifestyle Dommes you find attractive, only the pros?

Any ideas why that might be?


I'm not sure where you got that idea from. Seems like you're looking for something that isn't there. Good luck with that!




OneKinkyArtist -> RE: Is being a Pro/FinDomme the only way to test a prospective submissives authenticity? (7/11/2012 9:54:46 PM)

It's amazing how stupid a thread can turn!




LadyHibiscus -> RE: Is being a Pro/FinDomme the only way to test a prospective submissives authenticity? (7/11/2012 9:56:12 PM)

You started it!

So, you're saying that Chicago, where you live, has no female dominants that are not professionals?




seekingreality -> RE: Is being a Pro/FinDomme the only way to test a prospective submissives authenticity? (7/11/2012 10:44:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: OneKinkyArtist

I ask this question as I peruse through the dommes in my city that pique my interest and what I find is that all of the ones Ive seen are professional or financial Dominants. Now while I cant knock what the next person does I can say that I am at a lost for words on how disheartening it is for that to be so. I fancy myself a honest and true person , yet it is hard to find a Female Dominant when you dont have the money to allow them to control. I have many other uses both sexully and non sexually that I feel could be of major use. COuld anyone help me under stand this "phenomenon"



Financial/pro dommes don't want to test your submission; they want to sell you a service.

There are plenty of non-professional dommes. However, many men find it difficult to find one who is compatible and the process can take years.





fetisheden -> RE: Is being a Pro/FinDomme the only way to test a prospective submissives authenticity? (7/11/2012 11:34:33 PM)

right.this



quote:

ORIGINAL: seekingreality


quote:

ORIGINAL: OneKinkyArtist

I ask this question as I peruse through the dommes in my city that pique my interest and what I find is that all of the ones Ive seen are professional or financial Dominants. Now while I cant knock what the next person does I can say that I am at a lost for words on how disheartening it is for that to be so. I fancy myself a honest and true person , yet it is hard to find a Female Dominant when you dont have the money to allow them to control. I have many other uses both sexully and non sexually that I feel could be of major use. COuld anyone help me under stand this "phenomenon"



Financial/pro dommes don't want to test your submission; they want to sell you a service.

There are plenty of non-professional dommes. However, many men find it difficult to find one who is compatible and the process can take years.







LadyConstanze -> RE: Is being a Pro/FinDomme the only way to test a prospective submissives authenticity? (7/12/2012 6:00:31 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven


quote:

ORIGINAL: OneKinkyArtist

I ask this question as I peruse through the dommes in my city that pique my interest and what I find is that all of the ones Ive seen are professional or financial Dominants.


So there are no lifestyle Dommes you find attractive, only the pros?

Any ideas why that might be?


If I can venture an idea - might have to do with the pics, if a guy expects a model gorgeous domme with all the equipment and a session a la carte and be instantly accepted, he's better prepared to pay for it.




Lockit -> RE: Is being a Pro/FinDomme the only way to test a prospective submissives authenticity? (7/12/2012 8:00:27 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Privileged


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit

Well fuck wench, I didn't realize I needed a lie detector.

Who the fuck are you to tell the op what to put in his profile? He doesn't have to have anything about service provisions in his profile, nor does he have to answer to you... now does he?


Lemme try this again: "No lies detected" is an expression. Are you as offended when people agree by saying "THIS"? Because it means the same thing.

I have some questions:
Are everyone's observations and suggestions unwelcome? Or just mine?
Why are you swearing and calling me names?
What are you really pressed about?





It seems you don't know me as well as I know you. I cuss... often. When I am happy, when I am not happy, when I fucking feel like it. See? Wench is an expression. I use it when I am happy, when someone is evil in a good way or bad way, when I love someone and when I don't. I did in fact think you were talking to me as you gave no indication that you were talking to two people, until you explained it. Even then I thought it odd that you would use that expression with me, as if I needed validation or agreement on what I said, coming from someone I have seen lie on these forums. I don't need agreement from someone that lies. It might not be wise to make me prove that because I can, then everyone would see what I have seen. Okay Miss M...a? I can do it with things from this current profile and off site. Some of us do get around.

Whatever people think about the op's post or things said... he is speaking about not wanting a findom, therefore calling him to task on what is in his profile or not on his profile wouldn't pertain to what you wish to see there. You can say whatever you want. Just as you responded to me and used what I said to make a comment, I just didn't care for you using what I said and following it up with a comment I would never agree with or make under these specific circumstances. Combining the two with what I have seen of you with how you used an expression and those things alone were the reason I said what I did. I wasn't pressed about anything else. I thought it ironic that someone that I feel has lied was validating what I said and claiming it not to be a lie or agreeing with it. [:D]

I would have said nothing to you had you not included what I said in your comments to two people, even if I thought of you as I do. I respect some findom's and have never had a problem with them. Others, I don't respect, I don't often have anything to say to them and don't say anything. To each their own... but with you... well... I just find your absolute statements and misrepresentation of yourself... worthy of a response when you quote me.




TNDommeK -> RE: Is being a Pro/FinDomme the only way to test a prospective submissives authenticity? (7/12/2012 10:22:24 AM)

OP, you still didn't answer My question. I'm not sure if it was a fast reply or what, but you said something about grammar nazi to Me? I wasn't aware that I corrected your grammar. Grammar Nazi-ing is a whole different thread.




Rochsub2009 -> RE: Is being a Pro/FinDomme the only way to test a prospective submissives authenticity? (7/12/2012 10:56:28 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit

Well fuck wench, I didn't realize I needed a lie detector.

Who the fuck are you to tell the op what to put in his profile? He doesn't have to have anything about service provisions in his profile, nor does he have to answer to you... now does he?


I'm not one to get in the middle of a good cat fight, but I will say that when I read this response, I thought it was a bit strong for what had come before it.

Like others, I didn't understand the "No lie detected" comment, but I didn't think it was worthy of attack.

But based on your other comments, it seems like there is some history between the two of you, so I think the rest of us don't know the full story of what's actually going on here. But lacking that history, I probably would have been offended if someone started a comment to me with the words "Well fuck wench".

To quote the late Rodney King, "Can't we all just get along?" [;)]




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875