|
Privileged -> RE: Is being a Pro/FinDomme the only way to test a prospective submissives authenticity? (7/12/2012 11:45:53 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Lockit
quote:
ORIGINAL: Privileged
quote:
ORIGINAL: Lockit
Well fuck wench, I didn't realize I needed a lie detector.
Who the fuck are you to tell the op what to put in his profile? He doesn't have to have anything about service provisions in his profile, nor does he have to answer to you... now does he?
Lemme try this again: "No lies detected" is an expression. Are you as offended when people agree by saying "THIS"? Because it means the same thing.
I have some questions:
Are everyone's observations and suggestions unwelcome? Or just mine?
Why are you swearing and calling me names?
What are you really pressed about?
It seems you don't know me as well as I know you. I cuss... often. When I am happy, when I am not happy, when I fucking feel like it. See? Wench is an expression. I use it when I am happy, when someone is evil in a good way or bad way, when I love someone and when I don't. I did in fact think you were talking to me as you gave no indication that you were talking to two people, until you explained it. Even then I thought it odd that you would use that expression with me, as if I needed validation or agreement on what I said, coming from someone I have seen lie on these forums. I don't need agreement from someone that lies. It might not be wise to make me prove that because I can, then everyone would see what I have seen. Okay Miss M...a? I can do it with things from this current profile and off site. Some of us do get around.
Whatever people think about the op's post or things said... he is speaking about not wanting a findom, therefore calling him to task on what is in his profile or not on his profile wouldn't pertain to what you wish to see there. You can say whatever you want. Just as you responded to me and used what I said to make a comment, I just didn't care for you using what I said and following it up with a comment I would never agree with or make under these specific circumstances. Combining the two with what I have seen of you with how you used an expression and those things alone were the reason I said what I did. I wasn't pressed about anything else. I thought it ironic that someone that I feel has lied was validating what I said and claiming it not to be a lie or agreeing with it. [:D]
I would have said nothing to you had you not included what I said in your comments to two people, even if I thought of you as I do. I respect some findom's and have never had a problem with them. Others, I don't respect, I don't often have anything to say to them and don't say anything. To each their own... but with you... well... I just find your absolute statements and misrepresentation of yourself... worthy of a response when you quote me.
So because I'm a findomme, my opinion on the topic is invalid. Got it.
Lockit, you're welcome to explain/expose whatever fraud you think I'm guilty of. In public or via PM. It doesn't matter because I'm sure it's down to misunderstanding or impersonation. You didn't have to edit my name; it's not a secret. Every one of my loved ones knows about my involvement in D/s. There's no way in hell I'd be lying to people who could never impact my life, such as strangers on the internet.
|
|
|
|
