LookieNoNookie
Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: erieangel
The big question of the day seems to be when did Willard actually leave Bain Capital?
Willard has insisted for years that he left the company in 1999 in order to "save" the Olympics. Yet, in '02, when he was running for MA governor, he testified under oath that he had attended several board meetings, etc., both in person and over the phone. At the time, Willard was being forced to prove that he had been a resident of MA all along.
And Willard was paid "at least" $100,000 for each year between 1999 and 2002, when he actually did "officially" leave the company in order to run for MA governor.
So which is it, Willard.
I would love to see tax returns for those years. But Willard has said he has no intention of releasing any more tax returns except the 2011 return when he finally does file it.
I just looked at the calendar in Windows and....it's extremely clear (at least to me)....1999 is most distinctly not 2002.
(I know it seems crazy but....them are the facts).
As to why "Willard" (who the fuck is Willard, by the way) may have been paid $100,000.00 for each year between 1999 and 2002....let's do a little math shall we?
We all know that he's worth 200 million dollars.
(I'm gonna presume "Willard" is Romney).
So, for fucks sake (let's just run with this for a sec)....he tossed 150 million dollars into the ocean...pissed it all away....lit it on fire....that leaves 50 million.
In 1999, savings rates for a passbook account were between 4% and 6%.
Let's just say it was 3%...k?
$50,000,000,000.00 at 3% (if of course he was stupid enough to leave the entire 50 million in a savings account) would come to 1.5 million dollars.
EACH YEAR.
So, what you're saying is...."Willard" made less than 10% of what he could have made had he simply put his collective (1/4 of what he's worth today) in a passbook savings account (a CD would have paid 30% more still...but he wouldn't have figured that kind of shit out....he's a dumb ass right?), but that because he was paid $100,000.00 each year by (you didn't say...but I'll assume it was Bain Capital...seems logical since he was just shortly before, the CEO....so he would have had some thoughts on the way things might be run), he's an evil monster, incapable of feeling your pain.
Right.
Makes sense.
So, he opts to get paid 1/15th of what he could have earned in a savings account, he earned his millions by taking risk but....suddenly, in 1999, he decided to put everything in the worst possible investment available....and because of that....he's a shit for brains.
Bent on destroying jobs.
Okay....that makes perfect sense.
(For anyone that has absolutely no concept whatsoever of things as simple as MATH!!!!!)
I failed to mention/educate that...if we took all of the 4 years that "Willard" was paid the MASSIVE amount of $400,000.00, even that equates to less than 30% of what he would have made in ONE year at passbook savings rates.
Jeeeeeeezbuz.....how is it that a guy who's worth 200 million would have been that stoooopit?
Well, he's a dick...we all know that....destroying America...tha'ts for gawdamned sure.
< Message edited by LookieNoNookie -- 7/13/2012 7:19:44 PM >
|
Another problem for Romney: - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread