Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Why ObamaCare might work


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Why ObamaCare might work Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Why ObamaCare might work - 7/16/2012 1:25:41 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BenevolentM

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Several provisions have been in place for a while now. Hardly premature.


I have to confess that I do not regard what you just wrote as especially persuasive. A vague something about provisions that have been in place for awhile now. It is like saying the ground work for the revolution is in place.

Sigh.

I falsely assumed someone posting opinions about something would have some clue about the topic. Silly me.

Google is your friend. Several aspects of ACA went into place immediately, others along the way, the final parts in 2014. Preexisting conditions, keeping kids on your insurance through age 26, and so forth.

Whether you're fucking persuaded isn't the fucking point. It's not an opinion--it's history.

(in reply to BenevolentM)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Why ObamaCare might work - 7/16/2012 3:38:49 PM   
BenevolentM


Posts: 3394
Joined: 11/15/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

ORIGINAL: BenevolentM

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Several provisions have been in place for a while now. Hardly premature.


I have to confess that I do not regard what you just wrote as especially persuasive. A vague something about provisions that have been in place for awhile now. It is like saying the ground work for the revolution is in place.

Sigh.

I falsely assumed someone posting opinions about something would have some clue about the topic. Silly me.

Google is your friend. Several aspects of ACA went into place immediately, others along the way, the final parts in 2014. Preexisting conditions, keeping kids on your insurance through age 26, and so forth.

Whether you're fucking persuaded isn't the fucking point. It's not an opinion--it's history.


Persuasion is always the point. Shouldn't you have used an exclamation point instead of a period?

There were some legal changes. What would the economist Milton Friedman say? He was renown for his debate skills. My conclusion stands, what you are saying seems premature.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Why ObamaCare might work - 7/16/2012 4:35:39 PM   
BenevolentM


Posts: 3394
Joined: 11/15/2006
Status: offline
Another problem I have with the Supreme Court tax-penalty conversion is that it suggests that taxes aren't taxing.

(in reply to BenevolentM)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Why ObamaCare might work - 7/16/2012 8:21:14 PM   
erieangel


Posts: 2237
Joined: 6/19/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BenevolentM

Another problem I have with the Supreme Court tax-penalty conversion is that it suggests that taxes aren't taxing.



No it doesn't.

You have to remember the content here and forget what the pundits are saying.

The SC didn't actually say that the penalty is a tax (despite the pundits). What the SC said is that the penalty is permitted under the taxing authority of Congress.


(in reply to BenevolentM)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Why ObamaCare might work - 7/16/2012 9:54:21 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

what you are saying seems premature.


What I am saying is already past tense, and has been since April 2011, whatever fantasy world you choose to inhabit. The provisions in place are already matters of history. That you prefer ignorance leaves reality standing.

(in reply to BenevolentM)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Why ObamaCare might work - 7/17/2012 6:41:34 AM   
BenevolentM


Posts: 3394
Joined: 11/15/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: erieangel

quote:

ORIGINAL: BenevolentM

Another problem I have with the Supreme Court tax-penalty conversion is that it suggests that taxes aren't taxing.


No it doesn't.

You have to remember the content here and forget what the pundits are saying.

The SC didn't actually say that the penalty is a tax (despite the pundits). What the SC said is that the penalty is permitted under the taxing authority of Congress.


It can be taxing to explain oneself. How is this distinction you are drawing significant?

(in reply to erieangel)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Why ObamaCare might work - 7/17/2012 6:43:07 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
She is saying you need to read the Supreme Court decision before you decide what you think about it based on what you fantasize it says.

(in reply to BenevolentM)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Why ObamaCare might work - 7/17/2012 8:29:23 AM   
BenevolentM


Posts: 3394
Joined: 11/15/2006
Status: offline
Isn't it odd that thus far I am the only person in this thread who has advanced an explaination concerning why ObamaCare might work and I'm the one under attack by its proponents. There is silliness at work here.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Why ObamaCare might work - 7/17/2012 8:30:11 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
No, you're the only person clearly clueless about what you're talking about, both the ACA and the SC decision.

(in reply to BenevolentM)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Why ObamaCare might work - 7/17/2012 8:50:25 AM   
BenevolentM


Posts: 3394
Joined: 11/15/2006
Status: offline
I'm waiting on erieangel response and I am looking forward to it eagerly, but in general I suspect there are a great many people hiding behind artificial distinctions. This is something I pointed out in my threads on the topic. Government is replete with artificial distinctions. We need to call a spade, a spade. I feel that ObamaCare could have been sold as a tax.

(in reply to BenevolentM)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Why ObamaCare might work - 7/17/2012 8:55:37 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
It could have been sold as a hamburger, but there is no such thing as Obamacare.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BenevolentM)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Why ObamaCare might work - 7/17/2012 9:39:17 AM   
BenevolentM


Posts: 3394
Joined: 11/15/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

It could have been sold as a hamburger, ...


served with Freedom Fries.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Why ObamaCare might work - 7/17/2012 9:42:17 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
or a dollop of dumbass

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BenevolentM)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Why ObamaCare might work - 7/17/2012 10:11:56 AM   
BenevolentM


Posts: 3394
Joined: 11/15/2006
Status: offline
The trouble with this argument, a quote from Milton Friedman should help.

For some background information concerning who Milton Friedman was go to
http://www.edchoice.org/The-Friedmans/Remembering-Milton.aspx

quote:


Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself.

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/m/milton_friedman.html


Though likely true, the statement is also flawed when taken to an extreme. The economics of Ronald Regan and Margaret Thatcher became a religion. It isn't magic, but we began to think of it as magic. I recall the science fiction author Isaac Asimov writing about this in the Foundation Trilogy. The brilliance of Ronald Regan and Margaret Thatcher was to go for it because its time came. There was too much regulation, but those who came after these giants were lesser people. All was politics, politics abhors reason, and so things went to extremes. We really didn't understand what we were doing.

(in reply to BenevolentM)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Why ObamaCare might work - 7/17/2012 10:14:44 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Milton Friedman is a graduate of ninth grade and self-taught in economics, and since he was St Wrinklemeats bete noir, I think we can dispense with his wisdom.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BenevolentM)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Why ObamaCare might work - 7/17/2012 10:38:37 AM   
BenevolentM


Posts: 3394
Joined: 11/15/2006
Status: offline
The insurance companies understood the word penalty. The insurance companies knew they could get into trouble if the truth came out. Their extremist policies could be called into question. What they sought was a tax.

(in reply to BenevolentM)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Why ObamaCare might work - 7/17/2012 10:45:05 AM   
ClassIsInSession


Posts: 305
Joined: 7/26/2010
Status: offline
Who didn't finish school and later became significant in history?

Peter Jennings
Richard Branson
Robert Maxwell
The Wright Brothers
Thomas Edison
Kirk Kerkorian
Einstein didn't finish high school- I suppose we should ignore his contribution to physics.

< Message edited by ClassIsInSession -- 7/17/2012 10:46:36 AM >

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Why ObamaCare might work - 7/17/2012 11:13:15 AM   
BenevolentM


Posts: 3394
Joined: 11/15/2006
Status: offline
I think you are being evil mnottertail. Bad mnottertail.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Why ObamaCare might work - 7/17/2012 11:19:05 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
I doubt that he'll let it bother him any.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to BenevolentM)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Why ObamaCare might work - 7/17/2012 11:23:14 AM   
BenevolentM


Posts: 3394
Joined: 11/15/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ClassIsInSession

Einstein didn't finish high school- I suppose we should ignore his contribution to physics.


I feel you are making a good point. It is my understanding that the Nazis in Nazis Germany regarded the work of Albert Einstein as Jewish physics and because it was Jewish it was summarily dismissed; hence, Germany failed to build the bomb.

The moral of the lesson here is, it doesn't matter if it is Jewish physics or Jewish economics. Truth is truth.

quote:


Friedman was born in Brooklyn, New York, to recent Jewish immigrants Jeno Friedman and Sára Landau from Beregszász in Austria-Hungary (now Berehove in Ukraine), both of whom worked as dry goods merchants.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milton_Friedman

(in reply to ClassIsInSession)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Why ObamaCare might work Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.156