DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote:
ORIGINAL: ClassIsInSession Now there we have it, threats of violence from a liberal. I just knew we could catch it on record. For all the claims of intelligence, civility, tolerance and everything else liberals claim they have the monopoly on, the bitterness in their speaking reveals the true nature of the beast. You might want to tread a little lightly with the talk of killing their farmer, your beloved Obama passed the NDAA and unfortunately for you, it protects the interests of those neocons and teabaggers just as much as the rest of the government. It would be a shame if they took your words as a domestic terrorist threat and sent the military to detain you indefinitely without a trial... I have people from the other side condoning taking the president out...please dont go there Don't go where?!? Don't go warning that those words could be twisted out of context and acted upon? You are going to call ClassIsInSession out for that, but you apparently turn a blind eye when mnottertail says this: quote:
It would be a more workable solution and better for the country to line up corporate executives, their lobbyists and their servile corporate capitulists teabaggers and neo-cons in the house and shoot them. quote:
ORIGINAL thompsonx Why is violence off the table? ... Had you ever read a history book you would be well aware that liberals like washington,adams,jefferson et al were not the least bit shy about using not only threats of violence but actual armed violence....they even started a revolution and started a new country. While you were busy in the shit house a bunch of stuff happened. Dude, do you not recall all the hullabaloo over the violent rhetoric after Giffords was shot? The "Palin Cross Hairs Map" ring a bell? The Left went ballistic over the use of violent rhetoric, and called for a toning down of the attacks. What does it matter if Washington, Adams, Jefferson, et. al. used violent rhetoric? If you really want to go all the way back to their lifestyles, I suppose we could try, but I don't think many people would be able to cut the mustard, so to speak. Congress wasn't "in session" for the majority of the year. They had to work back home, if you recall. They believed in the right to own guns, and, presumably, how to use them properly (which is an integral piece for gun ownership, IMO). THAT is why violent talk is off the table. It's interesting that you claim a bunch of stuff happened while ClassIsInSession was in the shit house. It seems you've missed a significant part of the political debate over the last year or so.
_____________________________
What I support: - A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
- Personal Responsibility
- Help for the truly needy
- Limited Government
- Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
|