Real0ne -> RE: Tax for gun owners (7/31/2012 5:44:40 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: OsideGirl quote:
ORIGINAL: SilverMark I have no real issue with gun ownership, I have an issue with assault style weapons and the fact that not only can responsible people own them, but so can idiots! http://www.indystar.com/article/20120730/NEWS/120730020/South-Bend-3-year-old-accidently-shoots-himself They keep their guns in a gun safe, perhaps they should consider LOCKING IT! Here's the thing: what constitutes an "assault weapon" is cosmetic. It's defined by the barrel shroud, the grip, the stock etc. It's not defined by it's ability. On Sunday, I shot next to a guy that had an AR15 chambered as .22 long rifle. I was shooting a Marlin .22 long rifle. They're both semi-automatic. They both hold 10 rounds of ammunition in the magazine which is the maximum allowed by California law. They both fire at the same rate. The AR has a pin that has to be inserted to remove the magazine. My Marlin pops the magazine out with a flick of the thumb. Matter of fact, my .22LR has a kick ass scope, so I can use that thing like a surgeon (I was making smiley faces on my targets), while the AR had iron sights which is no where near as accurate. But, if I post pictures of that AR15 chambered as .22LR against a Barrett 50, people will say that the .22LR should be banned. I find it funny that so many people want "assault" weapons banned, but don't know what is deemed an assault rifle. It's about "it looks scary!" and has nothing to with abilities. This is the same thing as all the people that think Pit Bulls should be banned and any living Pit Bull should be killed. nice!
|
|
|
|