RE: Man "protecting his home" shoots & kills door-to-door salesman (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Owner59 -> RE: Man "protecting his home" shoots & kills door-to-door salesman (7/29/2012 9:40:26 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Just0Plain0Mike

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

We have 2nd Amendment rights here in Jersey also.......but we don`t get very many cases like the Martin killing.....



Ummm, no. I used to live in NJ. They only barely pay lip-service to the 2nd Amendment there.


Regarding the comment about Banning vs. Regulating, guns are already regulated. I can't get a machine gun without going through a massive amount of paperwork and background checks, and even then you can't in many areas. Depending on where you live, you can't get weapons that hold too many rounds of ammo, or are over a certain caliber. Some states you can't carry at all. Others only with a permit that's almost impossible to get unless you know the right people. You can't own a gun if you're a felon, or are crazy. There are any number of restrictions and regulations already in place.

This nut shouldn't have had a weapon to begin with, but he fell through the cracks. He only fired two shots, so no high capacity magazine restriction would have been a problem for him. It wasn't an "assault weapon" or a machine gun. So disregarding the fact that he shouldn't have had one because he was nuts, all guns would have had to be banned to keep a 2 shot weapon out of his hands.


And guns have more then one function as well. I carry a gun for protection, but have never had to use it. I've never even had to draw one in anger. Mostly, my guns get used for target practice.


.

30 to 40 % of guns sales don`t have background checks.....

Look it up.

All normal folks want is some accountability and responsibility along with their "gun rights".

But because of NRA nutters and their ilk.....we can`t even get something as reasonable as that passed.





Just0Plain0Mike -> RE: Man "protecting his home" shoots & kills door-to-door salesman (7/29/2012 9:41:00 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Guns solve every problem and make everyone safe......and if they don`t.....add more guns.....and while you`re at it.....relax or illuminate laws that discourage these types of tragedies.




No offense, but this statement could be reversed VERY easily.

Gun control laws make everyone safe.....and if they don't.....make new laws.,...and while you're at it......ban more guns because it's the scary looking guns that cause tragedies.




Moonhead -> RE: Man "protecting his home" shoots & kills door-to-door salesman (7/29/2012 9:41:13 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Just0Plain0Mike

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Besides: people make people fat, not spoons. If spoons were banned, people who want to get fat will just finds another way to get fat. They'll use a fork or improvise a fattening device with some chopsticks instead. A lot of fat people are very clever and will get fat no matter what. Spoon control won't make any difference to that...


Right, people are very clever. Even if you managed to get every gun out of the country, people would still find a way to injure and kill each other. They'll just use another device instead.

I was just making a point about "the gun control don't work" excuses most of the gunbunnies have been spouting since the thing in Colarado in order to mock Sanity's facile pseudo point, as a matter of fact.
[;)]




Musicmystery -> RE: Man "protecting his home" shoots & kills door-to-door salesman (7/29/2012 9:47:11 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Guns solve every problem and make everyone safe......and if they don`t.....add more guns.....and while you`re at it.....relax or illuminate laws that discourage these types of tragedies.



Don't be silly--guns alone won't solve everything.

You also need tax cuts.




Just0Plain0Mike -> RE: Man "protecting his home" shoots & kills door-to-door salesman (7/29/2012 9:52:51 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

30 to 40 % of guns sales don`t have background checks.....

Look it up.

All normal folks want is some accountability and responsibility along with their "gun rights".

But because of NRA nutters and their ilk.....we can`t even get something as reasonable as that passed.



Firstly, since we're talking about a specific incident and a specific person here, was the gun used in this shooting legally purchased? Was a background check conducted? Since a pistol was used, if it was purchased legally, a background check had to be done.

Secondly, where exactly do these 30-40% of unchecked gun sales take place? I live in PA. It has some of the loosest gun laws in the US. I can walk in, buy a gun, and be out with my new gun in under an hour. If they're not busy and you're fast at filling out paper-work, under 30 minutes. But every sale still has to go through a background check. To the best of my knowledge, any weapon purchased through a licensed firearms dealer, anywhere in the US, has to have a background check.

The only exception is if a private citizen sells a long-arm (rifle or shotgun) to another private citizen. Federal law doesn't require a background check for this sort of transfer of ownership. But since we're talking about a specific incident in which a pistol was used, this isn't really relevant.

Oh and by the way, thanks for classifying everyone who believes as you do "normal" and everyone else as a "nutter". Always a good way to hold a rational discussion, denigrate anyone who holds an opposing view point.




Sanity -> RE: Man "protecting his home" shoots & kills door-to-door salesman (7/29/2012 10:11:12 AM)


If you’ve got a dead body, a gun didn’t do that. Something else made that happen.




Musicmystery -> RE: Man "protecting his home" shoots & kills door-to-door salesman (7/29/2012 10:11:56 AM)

Specifically, the NRA.




Sanity -> RE: Man "protecting his home" shoots & kills door-to-door salesman (7/29/2012 10:13:39 AM)


Incorrect

Its the government that does everything

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Specifically, the NRA.





Moonhead -> RE: Man "protecting his home" shoots & kills door-to-door salesman (7/29/2012 10:15:44 AM)

You've got that one backwards: this is more about the NRA doing the government than the government doing the NRA.




Sanity -> RE: Man "protecting his home" shoots & kills door-to-door salesman (7/29/2012 10:41:19 AM)


How can that be, when the government generally and Obama specifically deserve the credit for everything

Think of it, Obama killed that poor salesman. After all, individuals cant do anything - especially not without Obama. Can they?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

You've got that one backwards: this is more about the NRA doing the government than the government doing the NRA.





Lucylastic -> RE: Man "protecting his home" shoots & kills door-to-door salesman (7/29/2012 11:42:23 AM)

Obviously Obama is to blame for everything right Sanity??
[image]http://i.huffpost.com/gen/706122/thumbs/o-IDAHO-BILLBOARD-COMPARES-OBAMA-JAMES-HOLMES-570.jpg[/image]




Sanity -> RE: Man "protecting his home" shoots & kills door-to-door salesman (7/29/2012 11:47:50 AM)


If you turn his "You didnt build that" claim around, thats what his logic would dictate, yes.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Obviously Obama is to blame for everything right Sanity??
[image]http://i.huffpost.com/gen/706122/thumbs/o-IDAHO-BILLBOARD-COMPARES-OBAMA-JAMES-HOLMES-570.jpg?6[/image]





Lucylastic -> RE: Man "protecting his home" shoots & kills door-to-door salesman (7/29/2012 11:50:53 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


If you turn his "You didnt build that" claim around, thats what his logic would dictate, yes.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Obviously Obama is to blame for everything right Sanity??
[image]http://i.huffpost.com/gen/706122/thumbs/o-IDAHO-BILLBOARD-COMPARES-OBAMA-JAMES-HOLMES-570.jpg?6[/image]



If you need to turn ANYTHING anyone says, around you can make an argument FOR anything,
it doesnt make it the truth, it makes you dishonest.(you is generic)




kalikshama -> RE: Man "protecting his home" shoots & kills door-to-door salesman (7/29/2012 1:27:58 PM)

quote:

Secondly, where exactly do these 30-40% of unchecked gun sales take place?


Private sales, which include guns shows, for which I was unable to get stats, likely because gun show laws vary by state and it seems like privates sales in states like Texas are not required to be documented.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_violence_in_the_United_States#Firearms_market

...only 60-70% of firearms sales in the United States are transacted through federally licensed firearm dealers, with the remainder taking place in the "secondary market", in which previously-owned firearms are transferred by non-dealers.[90][91] Most sales to youths and convicted felons take place through the secondary market.[92][93] Access to secondary markets is generally less convenient to purchasers, and involves such risks as the possibility of the gun having been used previously in a homicide or other crime.[94] Unlicensed private sellers were permitted by law to sell privately-owned guns at gun shows or at private locations in 24 states as of 1998.[95] Regulations that limit the number of handgun sales in the primary, regulated market to one handgun a month per customer have been shown to be effective at reducing illegal gun trafficking by reducing the supply into the secondary market.[96] Taxes on firearm purchases are another means for government to influence the primary market.[41]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_shows_in_the_United_States

In 2000, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) published the "Following the Gun" report.[18] The ATF analyzed more than 1,530 trafficking investigations over a two-and-a-half-year period and found gun shows to be the second leading source of illegally diverted guns in the nation. "Straw purchasing was the most common channel in trafficking investigations."[19] These investigations involved a total of 84,128 firearms that had been diverted from legal to illegal commerce. All told, the report identified more than 26,000 firearms that had been illegally trafficked through gun shows in 212 separate investigations. The report stated that: "A prior review of ATF gun show investigations shows that prohibited persons, such as convicted felons and juveniles, do personally buy firearms at gun shows and gun shows are sources of firearms that are trafficked to such prohibited persons. The gun show review found that firearms were diverted at and through gun shows by straw purchasers, unregulated private sellers, and licensed dealers. Felons were associated with selling or purchasing firearms in 46 percent of the gun show investigations. Firearms that were illegally diverted at or through gun shows were recovered in subsequent crimes, including homicide and robbery, in more than a third of the gun show investigations."




dcnovice -> RE: Man "protecting his home" shoots & kills door-to-door salesman (7/29/2012 2:08:30 PM)

FR

P&R seems to have gotten particularly silly lately.




Just0Plain0Mike -> RE: Man "protecting his home" shoots & kills door-to-door salesman (7/29/2012 6:51:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

quote:

Secondly, where exactly do these 30-40% of unchecked gun sales take place?


Private sales, which include guns shows, for which I was unable to get stats, likely because gun show laws vary by state and it seems like privates sales in states like Texas are not required to be documented.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_violence_in_the_United_States#Firearms_market

...only 60-70% of firearms sales in the United States are transacted through federally licensed firearm dealers, with the remainder taking place in the "secondary market", in which previously-owned firearms are transferred by non-dealers.[90][91] Most sales to youths and convicted felons take place through the secondary market.[92][93] Access to secondary markets is generally less convenient to purchasers, and involves such risks as the possibility of the gun having been used previously in a homicide or other crime.[94] Unlicensed private sellers were permitted by law to sell privately-owned guns at gun shows or at private locations in 24 states as of 1998.[95] Regulations that limit the number of handgun sales in the primary, regulated market to one handgun a month per customer have been shown to be effective at reducing illegal gun trafficking by reducing the supply into the secondary market.[96] Taxes on firearm purchases are another means for government to influence the primary market.[41]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_shows_in_the_United_States

In 2000, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) published the "Following the Gun" report.[18] The ATF analyzed more than 1,530 trafficking investigations over a two-and-a-half-year period and found gun shows to be the second leading source of illegally diverted guns in the nation. "Straw purchasing was the most common channel in trafficking investigations."[19] These investigations involved a total of 84,128 firearms that had been diverted from legal to illegal commerce. All told, the report identified more than 26,000 firearms that had been illegally trafficked through gun shows in 212 separate investigations. The report stated that: "A prior review of ATF gun show investigations shows that prohibited persons, such as convicted felons and juveniles, do personally buy firearms at gun shows and gun shows are sources of firearms that are trafficked to such prohibited persons. The gun show review found that firearms were diverted at and through gun shows by straw purchasers, unregulated private sellers, and licensed dealers. Felons were associated with selling or purchasing firearms in 46 percent of the gun show investigations. Firearms that were illegally diverted at or through gun shows were recovered in subsequent crimes, including homicide and robbery, in more than a third of the gun show investigations."


Umm, ok. You basically put up information that I already answered had you quoted the rest of my post.

Laws for gun shows may vary by state, but every one has to meet Federal guidelines. They can be stricter then the Federal laws, but they can't be laxer. It doesn't matter if it's Texas or New York.

Per Federal law, all handgun sales MUST go through a licensed FFL dealer. There is absolutely no wiggle room here. It's only long-arms that may be transferred without going through a dealer.

Everyone loves to talk about the evils of gun shows, but the whole "gun show loophole" is a myth. Yes, it makes it easier to meet and conduct a sale at a show. Many people walk around with rifles with For Sale signs on the muzzle. If you see one you like, you can buy it. It doesn't go through a background check, because Federal law doesn't require it. But you could do the same through an ad in the paper, on Craig's List, a bulletin board at the store, or any other place where one person is is looking to sell and another is looking to buy. There's nothing special about a sale being conducted at a show, other then convenience.

Now there's nothing stopping someone from selling a gun illegally, other then the risk of prison of course. So yes, a felon could get a gun through a straw buyer, but that's already illegal. So how would more legislation help? Doing a straw purchase is already a mandatory 10 year prison sentence. If you want to make the sentence longer, I'm all for it.

By the way, if someone sees you making an illegal sale at a show, you will be detained and the police called. Around here at least.




slvemike4u -> RE: Man "protecting his home" shoots & kills door-to-door salesman (7/29/2012 10:54:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Just0Plain0Mike

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Besides: people make people fat, not spoons. If spoons were banned, people who want to get fat will just finds another way to get fat. They'll use a fork or improvise a fattening device with some chopsticks instead. A lot of fat people are very clever and will get fat no matter what. Spoon control won't make any difference to that...


Right, people are very clever. Even if you managed to get every gun out of the country, people would still find a way to injure and kill each other. They'll just use another device instead.

Every once in awhile it occurs to me that perhaps we should just go ahead and put this tired old line to the test.




slvemike4u -> RE: Man "protecting his home" shoots & kills door-to-door salesman (7/29/2012 10:58:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


If you’ve got a dead body, a gun didn’t do that. Something else made that happen.

If that dead body has a bullet hole in it...in all probability there is/was a gun nearby [8|]




MrRodgers -> RE: Man "protecting his home" shoots & kills door-to-door salesman (7/30/2012 7:59:58 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Guns solve every problem and make everyone safe......and if they don`t.....add more guns.....and while you`re at it.....relax or illuminate laws that discourage these types of tragedies.



Hey, I am with you. Do not take away my assualt weapons plus, I want my Thompson fully automatic .45 cal. machine gun back. That would shift jobs back to the US. Oh wait...no it wouldn't.

I also want my howitzer, and hand grenades too. All mind you, just for my protection, oh and...standing my ground of course.

Land mines anyone ?




SilverMark -> RE: Man "protecting his home" shoots & kills door-to-door salesman (7/30/2012 11:03:30 AM)

I think we are missing the IMPORTANT point here!

Does this mean I can shoot the next Jehovah's Witness that knocks on my door?





Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875