RemoteUser -> RE: D/s Dynamic.... How do you explain it ? (7/31/2012 6:53:26 AM)
|
If you wanted to keep it basic (we could throw poly and other fun stuff in there, but that's more for evil giggles, and not for the newly-inducted vanilla): D/s can be summed up as two people who share compatible interests. For some people that's golf or literature, for others, it's sexual drive. The Dominant aspect wants to control, the submissive wants to be controlled. How that balances out is like anything else; sometimes it's "fair" and sometimes it's not. It depends on what those two people want, and how they meet each other's interests. (Fair is also subjective. Throw inaccurately-defined feminism in there and of course it's going to get messy.) The bottom line is that when two people meet each other's wants and needs from either side of the dynamic, it's a relationship, and like littlewonder said, traditional at that point. I think fairness will be the biggest hurdle. People will ask why someone would want to be controlled, or state that controlling someone is abuse. It is not. While it vastly oversimplifies and doesn't do the dynamic justice, the best thing a vanilla could relate to is the parent/child dynamic, where rules have to be enforced for the sake of everyone. The parent wants what's best for the child, and enforces rules to make it so as they see fit. The child needs guidance and benefits from this enforcement. If that's too Oedipal, go with teacher/student. Try to avoid militant authority figure enactment unless the person you're talking to is a fan of the police, or government. There are numerous parallels you could use; take your audience into consideration and pander a little. The key is to get the idea across to them in a way they will appreciate, after all. Best of luck with this. [:)]
|
|
|
|