ChatteParfaitt
Posts: 6562
Joined: 3/22/2011 From: The t'aint of the Midwest -- Indiana Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: metamorfosis In other words, whether "genuine submissives" love to be humiliated is entirely subjective, and the answer will depend on whether the person answering has a humiliation fetish. Pam But when I said "Anyone who equates submission and humiliation is (JMO) emotionally dangerous and should be avoided.' it was in response to the Quarterback person. The issue I addressed was not about loving humiliation. I love to be humiliated in some contexts, and I hate it in others, and I believe many submissives, however genuine in Rule's book, feel the same. Do all subs love to be humiliated? Of course not. But (hello?) equating submission and humiliation is not loving it. It is saying submission and humiliation are equal. In other words, it is saying to be submissive is humiliating in it's own right. And I do not believe that. This is what *I* mean by humiliate: abase, chasten, cheapen, debase, degrade, demean, discredit, disgrace, dishonor, foul, humble, lower, mortify, shame, sink, smirch, take down. None of those words apply to me. I do not obey, serve and please my dominant out of a place of shame and dishonor. Quite the opposite. I obey serve and please him out of a sense of reverence for the man he is. He does not lower me, I raise him. So I will state again, anyone who thinks being submissive is debasing, degrading, and demeaning is not emotionally healthy. That's a dangerous person, and should be avoided.
< Message edited by ChatteParfaitt -- 11/25/2012 4:17:07 AM >
_____________________________
|