SpaceSpank
Posts: 244
Joined: 10/3/2010 Status: offline
|
That's simply because you're confusing and combining issues. It's a common problem. One of the big issues surrounding child medication is that personal responsibility seems to be a foreign concept. Those kids with ADD/ADHD and other similar issues? Sure there are some who honestly do need medication. But for many it's that the parents have no desire to take responsibility, and therefore there MUST be something wrong with their kids. It's the same with depression medication, although there is the additional stigma of needing therapy. People know there is something wrong with them (or someone they are a guardian for), but they don't want therapy... that's for crazy people! (Which is exactly what a good number of people think). So they go and see someone and get prescribed drugs. Just like the kids, there are those who NEED them, they have honest chemical imbalances that need to be sorted out, not any psychological issues to talk and work out. As for Alzheimers, it's a disease yes, but it is not caused by a virus or bacteria. it's like cancer, your own body causes it. You cannot "cure" that because your own body is the cause. You can simply eradicate the end result (defective cells, etc) But they can always come back at any point because the underlying cause (your body) is still there. Obviously there are outside influences (of which we have no full and complete understanding yet) that can influence such things. But ultimately, we have no ability to go in and fix the underlying mechanisms that were either broken from the start, or became broken otherwise, that create these diseases. It will be a long time until we're at a sufficient level of technology and understanding before we can cure anything like that. We have no magic pills. And non profit organizations need money. They can only do as well as their funding. So if you want one that can go toe to toe with the big pharma companies... I'd like to see that. Who provides the billions in R&d money that is needed every single year for the entire life span of the company? Who are these people that are willing to spend that much, not only with a guarantee that they will never see a return on investment, but have no guarantees of any effective product ever? Universities get money from all over to do basic research, they do not create, market, sell, or continually refine all of these products, and take none of the risks of doing so. I'm not standing up for the rather idiotic practices of these large companies, but they are (generally) just looking to make money while they can, not be mustachio twirling villains.
|