Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Rep.King Says He’s Never Heard Of UMs Getting Pregnant Through Rape


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Rep.King Says He’s Never Heard Of UMs Getting Pregnant Through Rape Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Rep.King Says He’s Never Heard Of UMs Getting Pregnan... - 8/21/2012 7:37:53 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline 		More extremism for our con-dummies.......

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/08/21/rep-steve-king-says-hes-never-heard-of-children-getting-pregnant-through-rape-video/


Is this ugliness purposeful ?

< Message edited by Owner59 -- 8/21/2012 7:38:28 PM >

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Rep.King Says He’s Never Heard Of UMs Getting Pre... - 8/21/2012 7:45:21 PM   
SlipSlidingAway


Posts: 223
Joined: 11/24/2006
Status: offline 		How about this one?  From Kansas Rep Pete DeGraaf?  Comparing rape to a flat tire?

http://www.motherjones.com/mixed-media/2011/05/venn-diagram-rape-vs-flat-tire

< Message edited by SlipSlidingAway -- 8/21/2012 7:52:38 PM >

_____________________________

"...ethical behavior should be based...on sympathy, education, and social ties; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death. " —Albert Einstein

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Rep.King Says He’s Never Heard Of UMs Getting Pre... - 8/21/2012 9:01:16 PM   
DaNewAgeViking


Posts: 1009
Joined: 4/29/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Is this ugliness purposeful ?

Yes. Each of them is trying to prove he is purer and holier than all the rest, which doesn't have to do with the elections so much as with establishing their place in the Con-iverse. You'd think they would realize this fanaticism will hurt them, but in fact the 'undecided' don't matter to their mindset. Either you're one of them, and prove it constantly by being endlessly in-your-face righteous - or you aren't. Those who aren't will presumably be dealt with when the 'Rapture' comes in November. In that regard, 'November' will always be coming in their world view.


< Message edited by DaNewAgeViking -- 8/21/2012 9:02:07 PM >

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Rep.King Says He’s Never Heard Of UMs Getting Pre... - 8/22/2012 5:51:02 AM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline 		Flowchart: "Can I Get Pregnant?"

Learn the biology of your body, according to conservative male lawmakers.

Remember the birds and the bees? The miracle of birth? Forget everything you knew. Turns out there's a lot more to birthin' babies than you might have learned in your godless socialist public-school health class. From this weekend's assertion by Rep. Todd Akin (R-Mo.) that women can't conceive babies during a "legitimate rape" to Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) saying Monday that he didn't know of any pregnancies caused by incest or statutory rape, conservative male lawmakers targeting reproductive rights have always held, shall we say, minority views on the biology of all things uterine.

Did you know about women's natural stress-induced spermicides? Have you ever seen "God's little protective shield" in a vagina? That's because they don't exist—but these legislators don't know that.

Interactive flowchart: http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/08/flowchart-can-i-get-pregnant

If you're of the double-X persuasion, all of this might leave you a bit flummoxed as to whether you'll conceive. Well, don't worry your pretty little head about it: We've collected the basics of reproductive biology according to conservative politicians, in a handy flowchart format. Need to determine your uterus' destiny? Just ask these men!

_____________________________

Curious about the "Sluts Vote" avatars? See http://www.collarchat.com/m_4133036/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#4133036

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Rep.King Says He’s Never Heard Of UMs Getting Pre... - 8/23/2012 5:24:23 AM   
DarkSteven


Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline 		I'll be darned. Magical changes must take place on a woman's eighteenth birthday. Where do these idiots come from and - more to the point - who votes for them?

_____________________________

"You women....

The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs...

Quit fretting. We men love you."

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Rep.King Says He’s Never Heard Of UMs Getting Pre... - 8/23/2012 5:37:08 AM   
subspaceseven


Posts: 467
Joined: 3/2/2012
Status: offline 		A lot of people on these boards vote for them........I guess if they cut education enough, the whole country will think like they want us to...

(in reply to DarkSteven)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Rep.King Says He’s Never Heard Of UMs Getting Pre... - 8/23/2012 6:02:26 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		I found this one last night, which I thought was hysterical... but its supposed to be serious (I think)
You want off-the-charts status? Check out the curriculum vitae of one Willard M. Romney: $200 million in the bank (and a hell of a lot more if he didn’t give so much away), apex alpha executive, CEO, chairman of the board, governor, bishop, boss of everything he’s ever touched. Son of the same, father of more. It is a curious scientific fact (explained in evolutionary biology by the Trivers-Willard hypothesis — Willard, notice) that high-status animals tend to have more male offspring than female offspring, which holds true across many species, from red deer to mink to Homo sap. The offspring of rich families are statistically biased in favor of sons — the children of the general population are 51 percent male and 49 percent female, but the children of the Forbes billionaire list are 60 percent male. Have a gander at that Romney family picture: five sons, zero daughters. Romney has 18 grandchildren, and they exceed a 2:1 ratio of grandsons to granddaughters (13:5). When they go to church at their summer-vacation home, the Romney clan makes up a third of the congregation. He is basically a tribal chieftain.

Professor Obama? Two daughters. May as well give the guy a cardigan. And fallopian tubes.
From an evolutionary point of view, Mitt Romney should get 100 percent of the female vote. All of it. He should get Michelle Obama’s vote. You can insert your own Mormon polygamy joke here, but the ladies do tend to flock to successful executives and entrepreneurs. Saleh al-Rajhi, billionaire banker, left behind 61 children when he cashed out last year. We don’t do harems here, of course, but Romney is exactly the kind of guy who in another time and place would have the option of maintaining one. He’s a boss. Given that we are no longer roaming the veldt for the most part, money is a reasonable stand-in for social status. Romney’s net worth is more than that of the last eight U.S. presidents combined
https://www.nationalreview.com/nrd/articles/313504/boss
But specifically I love what Linkens did with the article in a response at huff n poo
"
I'm sort of gratified that someone has finally had the courage to argue for Mitt Romney's election based on theories culled from "Doctor Strangelove" -- specifically Base Commander Jack D. Ripper's contention that "precious bodily fluids" are the be-all and end-all signifier of American Exceptionalism. Stepping up to offer this contention is the National Review's Kevin D. Williamson, and I'll straight up admit that I'm envious that there is a guy out there who can write such an argument for a living. Kudos, sirrah!

So, the basic gist of his piece is that Mitt Romney has got mad-potent baby batter brewin' in his loins, and if you ladies knew what was good for you, you'd step to the fore to receive his communion, because -- after all -- "the conventional biological wisdom is that men select mates for fertility, while women select for status."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/22/mitt-romney-female-vote-national-review_n_1822470.html



_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to DarkSteven)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Rep.King Says He’s Never Heard Of UMs Getting Pre... - 8/23/2012 9:35:37 AM   
erieangel


Posts: 2237
Joined: 6/19/2011
Status: offline 		"I think it’s immoral for us to compel conscientious objecting taxpayers to fund abortion through the federal government..." Rep. King.

I find it immoral that conscientious objecting taxpayers are compelled to fund wars of choice--read Iraq. But I can do little about that as a citizen except vote my displeasure.

I find King and those like him to be idiots.

Ok, I'm off to work. Had a few moments after checking email and thought I'd check out what was happening here.


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 8
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Rep.King Says He’s Never Heard Of UMs Getting Pregnant Through Rape Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.063