tweakabelle
Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007 From: Sydney Australia Status: offline
|
quote:
VincentML in October Israel attacks Iran, and Iran retaliates against American troops and ships? You may assume it was a unilateral attack without warning to President Obama, or not. You should assume retaliation against Israel from Iran and Hezbollah. What do you think the political reactions will be from the Left and the Right in the United States? Suppose Iran does not retaliate against American troops and ships. What then? Will Obama go to the United Nations if Israel is under attack instead of responding directly to help Israel? If so, where goes the election? What is the view from Britain, Canada, Australia, Norway, etc? What is the strategic national interest of the United States in this event? How goes Russia, China, Jordan, Arabia, Egypt, etc? Off hand, I think Obama will engage our military in either event. He will win the election. Just my opinion to start. What do you think Obama's response should be or will be? As things stand, an Israeli attack on Iran in Oct seems unlikely to me. Israelis themselves are split on this issue - a majority of Israelis oppose a strike, the IDF leadership opposes it, even Pres. Peres (no peacenik!) opposes the strike. Whether a strike by the IDF without direct US involvement and technology will succeed is doubted by many military experts, and even if it does, it will at best retard Iran by 12-18 months. So the upside is murky, the downside risks enormous, the fallout incalculable. My feeling is that Netanyahu’s brinkmanship is best understood as follows: Netanyahu is desperate to avoid a second Obama term. A re-elected Obama would be far less susceptible to Israeli pressure, far more likely to assert US interests first . Romney has already shown that he is prepared to allow the Israelis to set his agenda and policy. So Netanyahu is trying, to (a) influence the US election to benefit Romney and (b) if Obama wins, trying to tie his hands as much as possible in advance. He can achieve (b) through agreeing not to strike in return for political, economic and diplomatic concessions from Obama. Obama, who has already shown his reluctance to stand up to Israeli pressure - remember his craven capitulation at the UN? - will agree. (probably against his better judgement). He doesn’t want to be vulnerable to Romney on this issue. Nor does he want an Israeli strike, with its unknown consequences. If Netanyahu strikes Iran he has played his ace and his ability to influence either the election or Obama is reduced considerably. Far better for him to extract a series of concessions from Obama that will tie Obama’s hands for the duration of his second term and (from Netanyahu’s POV) ensure Israel/AIPAC's ongoing stranglehold over US policy in the ME. Another four years and the colonisation of the West Bank will be irreversible, the already-comatose Two State solution dead and buried - two of Netanyahu's primary goals will be "facts on the ground".
< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 8/26/2012 2:29:40 AM >
_____________________________
|