|
ResidentSadist -> RE: Curious about BDSM and ancient type slavery y ... (8/26/2012 11:21:20 AM)
|
I am reconstructing your posts so they fall into more cohesive questions. I hope I got your intent correctly. [ ] mark my changes.
Is this possible to turn back to ancient slavery period which was exist during 1600 to 1800 AC specially in USA where black [Africans] were traded for slavery and/or in ancient China or Roman Empire , through BDSM ?
--- Are you asking if consensual slaves in BDSM can be used like the nonconsensual slaves when slavery was legal? Yes, if they consent to being used that way. Some will revel in living like a beast of burden, others will not.
Can Women [be used] free of [pay as] slaves in industry or farm work , land , or as any labour etc etc through BDSM ?
--- Seems like the same question again so the answer is the same, yes, if they consent to being used that way.
And if it is possible why [up until] now [why haven’t] land Owner Ladies [freely used] slaves in thier garden , land , farm , factory etc?
--- They have. There are many “land Owner Ladies”/Dommes that have voluntary domestic servants/slaves tending their house and garden.
I think [current] wide use of slaves through BDSM as labor in farms , industry , factory etc, is not very popular.
--- Seems like the same question again. Are you asking about slave labor in industry or domestic slaves tending a ladies garden? There is a BIG difference. BDSM is a mix of leather, bondage and discipline. It is not a tyrant using only discipline to beat free labor out of dozens of volunteers with a leather whip and making them pick cotton or build a pyramid. So to answer your question, I don’t think we can have slavery like it was during 1600 to 1800s in the way you imagined it. . . . not really.
But hold you horses because I can have some of the aspects of the 1600 to 1800s slavery in the way I imagine it.
I have had the pleasure of corporate slaves. My slaves, whom were also my lovers, worked for free in my corporation doing office work. They weren’t exactly picking cotton in the fields but they worked and labored for free at my company which was a very posh office environment with lots of perks.
I have had the pleasure of domestic slaves. My slaves, whom were also my lovers, worked for free in my home doing domestic chores, cleaning, washing and tending my yard (garden).
I have had the pleasure of poly slaves. My slaves collectively, whom were also my lovers, tended to me, my home and office (business). So like the plantation owner who's business was cotton or sugar, my slaves labored at my business but were free of the beast of burden aspects toiling in the fields. Besides, if my business was to tend the land, we have invented machines to do the hard labor nowadays and the slaves would have to drive a piece of agricultural machinery instead of office machinery.
I hope I understood you questions and answered you with some clarity. I don't know if it is a language barrier that makes you appear to focus on the beast of burden image tending land, farms and industry or if that is truly your image of a slave . . . a sweaty beast tending the fields and working in industry. I know the Indian culture is one that still adopts social classes and perhaps that is where the imagery gets lost between us.
|
|
|
|
