RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


IWillTeachYouGir -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (1/23/2013 7:39:38 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheLilSquaw

quote:

ORIGINAL: IWillTeachYouGir


To me it has always boiled down to: Would you be this way if no money was involved? That should determine the legitimacy of it.



So does that mean that teachers that don't teach for FREE aren't really teachers?
Does that mean if my mechanic doesn't fix my car for FREE that he isn't really a mechanic?

Really? Lol


I think you kind of missed the point in a rush to make a comment. Being a teacher or mechanic isn't really a comparison to being a part of an alternative lifestyle since it (the lifestyle) has more to do with emotions and feeling, not monetary reward and we all (although some probably should) don't get degrees in it.

I think that is where all the feelings get hurt here, are you Domme if money isn't involved or is money what makes you one? Again, like the rest of my post said, I don't care, to each their own but it is a pretty legitimate question. You make it sound like if we don't get paid it isn't real.




TheLilSquaw -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (1/23/2013 7:46:01 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: IWillTeachYouGir

I think you kind of missed the point in a rush to make a comment. Being a teacher or mechanic isn't really a comparison to being a part of an alternative lifestyle since it (the lifestyle) has more to do with emotions and feeling, not monetary reward and we all (although some probably should) don't get degrees in it.

I think that is where all the feelings get hurt here, are you Domme if money isn't involved or is money what makes you one? Again, like the rest of my post said, I don't care, to each their own but it is a pretty legitimate question. You make it sound like if we don't get paid it isn't real.


I don't think my comparisons are off this time.
Although I admit sometimes they are a lil out there.
To ME, it's the same idea.

Here is why...

Because I am a teacher regardless.
However, I will not teach for free.

I am a switch regardless.
However, I will not do sessions with people other than my primary partner(s) for free.

I enjoy financial domination.
However, I obviously don't do it for free.

I enjoy participating in fetish videos.
Again, I wouldn't do it for free.

You can enjoy things and still refuse to do them for free.




absolutchocolat -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (1/23/2013 11:13:05 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheLilSquaw

I don't think my comparisons are off this time.
Although I admit sometimes they are a lil out there.
To ME, it's the same idea.

Here is why...

Because I am a teacher regardless.
However, I will not teach for free.

I am a switch regardless.
However, I will not do sessions with people other than my primary partner(s) for free.

I enjoy financial domination.
However, I obviously don't do it for free.

I enjoy participating in fetish videos.
Again, I wouldn't do it for free.

You can enjoy things and still refuse to do them for free.



[sm=champ.gif]




MissVixen29 -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (1/23/2013 4:39:12 PM)

Everyone has their own fantasy and things that get them off. If it's a woman who fantasizes about getting paid for it once in awhile, or a man who fantasizes about being controlled that way... who is one person to judge over another?
The best thing about BDSM in general is there ARE no rules. Everyone can be themselves, and indulge their own proclivities without fear!




TNDommeK -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (1/24/2013 12:05:29 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: IWillTeachYouGir

This was all a very cool read to be honest.

To me it has always boiled down to: Would you be this way if no money was involved? That should determine the legitimacy of it. That said, people should do whatever they want, if you are into this and get paid for it, more power to you. The whole point of this entire "lifestyle" should be to be yourself anyways. Otherwise we would all just try to fit to some strict moral code of living.

For the Dancer in here, you girls work you butts off, more power to you if you find enjoyment in it, regulars, and making good money.

As for the fake adds, etc. All of us are supposed to be adults on here and it is the internet. If dudes want to throw their money at fake profiles, etc. let them. For them it is probably a rush and safer then getting busted calling an escort or something. That is why they do it. They know it isn't real.



I got what you said.. And yes, I would be. But I happen to enjoy that aspect of control. But yes, I would still be this way.

Thank you for the dancer compliment. Yes we do work our asses off,lol.

And your right about the fake adds part. I never really stopped to think about maybe it's something they enjoy. Kinda like a financial Russian roulette. Hey, whatever floats their boat.




EsotericLady -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (1/24/2013 12:46:32 AM)

I am an experienced female Dominant who is neither a Pro Domme nor a Fin-Domme. It may work well for others, however I don't have to desire nor the time for either one. I'm financially sound, with no desire to teach a submissive how to better manage his money. I'm not wrapped up in societal norms as I've explained in my profile so I'm not concerned about who pays for what when a submissive and I are together.

I agree with the two comments below. I haven't been on this site for very long, but in the time I have, I've never seen such an influx of 20 something Fin-Dommes on a website in my life! It's like all of a sudden these girls have figured out how to get a "free ride," and are falling all over each other trying to join the site.

As for what I think about Financial Domination and if it should be considered a "legitimate" area of BDSM? I honestly don't know. I understand its intentions, but... (shrugs) I have a difficult time wrapping my logical mind around it. You mentioned also that so many of us keep pointing out the 20 something Fin-Dommes. But to be honest, I have yet to see an older,experienced Fin-Domme bring attention to herself.

(Thank you)
quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl

... I think the majority of so-called "Dommes" in this field aren't. They have no idea what it means to be dominant (nor do I think they care) and they equate being dominant with being a bitchy twat. They're just a bunch "women" that have discovered that some guys are desperate enough to buy them gifts and pay their bills.



quote:

ORIGINAL: Rochsub2009

... I can honestly say that I am sometimes sickened by the number of 19 year old "financial Dommes" there are on CM.

... I seriously question how much knowledge all of these 19 year old financial dommes are bringing to the party. Will the really have enough knowledge and experience to draw upon to give a paying client his money's worth?

Also, a pet peeve of mine is Dommes who are giving people the bird in their profile pics. And it seems like financial Dommes are the ones who are most likely to strike this pose in their pictures. [:'(]






TNDommeK -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (1/24/2013 1:12:56 AM)

Well to name a few, myself, lil Squaw and Allison Wilder would be examples of experienced fin dommes.

Now the 19 year old princesses...definitely want a free ride.




IWillTeachYouGir -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (1/24/2013 4:29:20 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheLilSquaw

quote:

ORIGINAL: IWillTeachYouGir

I think you kind of missed the point in a rush to make a comment. Being a teacher or mechanic isn't really a comparison to being a part of an alternative lifestyle since it (the lifestyle) has more to do with emotions and feeling, not monetary reward and we all (although some probably should) don't get degrees in it.

I think that is where all the feelings get hurt here, are you Domme if money isn't involved or is money what makes you one? Again, like the rest of my post said, I don't care, to each their own but it is a pretty legitimate question. You make it sound like if we don't get paid it isn't real.


I don't think my comparisons are off this time.
Although I admit sometimes they are a lil out there.
To ME, it's the same idea.

Here is why...

Because I am a teacher regardless.
However, I will not teach for free.

I am a switch regardless.
However, I will not do sessions with people other than my primary partner(s) for free.

I enjoy financial domination.
However, I obviously don't do it for free.

I enjoy participating in fetish videos.
Again, I wouldn't do it for free.

You can enjoy things and still refuse to do them for free.



All good points but you are not really answering the question. Enjoying it is not the same as being it (at least in my mind). I think it is an apples and oranges thing but respect your opinion on it.

I guess my main point is the being a Dominant (or a submissive) is not really a job which is why you can't compare it to teaching or being a mechanic. I think this is why (not me) have such a big problem with this from of fantasy D/s.




IWillTeachYouGir -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (1/24/2013 4:32:12 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TNDommeK


quote:

ORIGINAL: IWillTeachYouGir

This was all a very cool read to be honest.

To me it has always boiled down to: Would you be this way if no money was involved? That should determine the legitimacy of it. That said, people should do whatever they want, if you are into this and get paid for it, more power to you. The whole point of this entire "lifestyle" should be to be yourself anyways. Otherwise we would all just try to fit to some strict moral code of living.

For the Dancer in here, you girls work you butts off, more power to you if you find enjoyment in it, regulars, and making good money.

As for the fake adds, etc. All of us are supposed to be adults on here and it is the internet. If dudes want to throw their money at fake profiles, etc. let them. For them it is probably a rush and safer then getting busted calling an escort or something. That is why they do it. They know it isn't real.



I got what you said.. And yes, I would be. But I happen to enjoy that aspect of control. But yes, I would still be this way.

Thank you for the dancer compliment. Yes we do work our asses off,lol.

And your right about the fake adds part. I never really stopped to think about maybe it's something they enjoy. Kinda like a financial Russian roulette. Hey, whatever floats their boat.



Thanks for answering.

You are welcome, you all do. BTW, you can always tell the girls that enjoy it or at least get off on the control they have and just the hard line pros. Really no different then the discussion some of you all were having about actually enjoying it vs the runners.




AllisonWilder -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (1/24/2013 7:12:56 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: EsotericLady

I am an experienced female Dominant who is neither a Pro Domme nor a Fin-Domme. It may work well for others, however I don't have to desire nor the time for either one. I'm financially sound, with no desire to teach a submissive how to better manage his money. I'm not wrapped up in societal norms as I've explained in my profile so I'm not concerned about who pays for what when a submissive and I are together.

I agree with the two comments below. I haven't been on this site for very long, but in the time I have, I've never seen such an influx of 20 something Fin-Dommes on a website in my life! It's like all of a sudden these girls have figured out how to get a "free ride," and are falling all over each other trying to join the site.

As for what I think about Financial Domination and if it should be considered a "legitimate" area of BDSM? I honestly don't know. I understand its intentions, but... (shrugs) I have a difficult time wrapping my logical mind around it. You mentioned also that so many of us keep pointing out the 20 something Fin-Dommes. But to be honest, I have yet to see an older,experienced Fin-Domme bring attention to herself.

(Thank you)


What do you mean by older? Miss Pinky Galore (who I believe is on this site as MistressPinky) has been around for a long time (on this site for over 5 years) and I believe she's in her late 30s, early 40s.

As far as the 20-somethings go, are we talking about the 20-23 year olds or anyone with a 2 as the first number of their age? I'm 27, so technically I'm not falling into your older, experienced category, although I believe I should.




TNDommeK -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (1/24/2013 7:59:09 AM)

I assume she was referring to anyone above 25ish, maybe? I could most certainly be wrong. Don't ask where I get 25 from, just something that came to mind.




TheLilSquaw -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (1/24/2013 8:36:38 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TNDommeK

Well to name a few, myself, lil Squaw and Allison Wilder would be examples of experienced fin dommes.

Now the 19 year old princesses...definitely want a free ride.


I am far older than my mid 20's trust me. Lol
Yep, I am a lifestyle and pro switch that practices financial domination.
And I am FAR from a newbie to the lifestyle / BDSM scene or as a pro.
Hell I have been active in the scene since 1994.

I know more than a handful of pros both male and female who practice financial domination both male and female on CollarMe and none of them are new to the scene.

Are there A LOT of bratty princesses?
Yep, but again there is a niche for the young 18-25 yr old bratty princess.
If there wasn't a niche they wouldn't be around not just on CollarMe but in the scene period.





lee1979 -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (2/1/2013 2:33:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Rochsub2009
but is this really different from the societal norm that says that the man should pay?


I agree with pretty much everything you said except this bit. I really don't think this is even remotely true in the modern world and have been on plenty of vanilla dates and never once did the girl feel it was acceptable to expect me to pay for everything.




thishereboi -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (2/1/2013 2:39:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TAFKAA


quote:

ORIGINAL: AllisonWilder
Is managing someones finances a form of D/s?
No. Otherwise we'd be drowning in accountant Doms - except they seem to tend more to the sub side of things.

quote:

I say yes. I say when you work for it, if you work extra/overtime for it, I say where it goes, be it a savings account, a 401k, bills, food, family, yourself, electronics, books, shoes, anything. If you are my sub, you ask to buy so much as a pack of gum because I control your money.
So your 'subs' are basically fools. Giving control of your money to someone you don't know is how people are swindled. They have absolutely no way of knowing what you'll do with it or if they'll end up in financial ruin. If they happen to have a family, they're wildly irresponsible fools.

And people honestly can't see why anyone would object to this? Wake up and smell the maple-nut crunch people. How many families go into penury because of this shit? Christ, no wonder you fuckers object to universal health care - you really don't give a flying fuck about anyone but yourselves.


Where did she say or even imply that she doesn't know her subs? Maybe all that hostility you are carrying around is affecting your reading ability.




thishereboi -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (2/1/2013 2:43:22 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AllisonWilder

TNDommeK, I understand where the opinions come from. I get that all people are exposed to are the bratty bitches flipping the bird and barely speaking to them, if they speak to them at all after. I've come across profile after profile that's filled with wishlist info, 'fuck you, pay me' crap, 'I'm better than you, little piggy, now pay to worship me' kinds of stuff so I get the frustration.

It certainly doesn't help that they multiply like rabbits and then come spew their 'I'm better than you, now pay me and bow to me' shit on the discussion board side. They make those of us that are actually involved in this life and that are into the fetish look like idiots. Because of all of that, it makes it harder for people to ever take us seriously, even though we've proven over and over that we're real people who can hold conversations and don't expect every person to pay for our time.

I'll never change someones mind about me and after 30 pages of me participating in this thread, I no longer expect to. I also no longer care. I am what I am, I'm honest about it, I'm up front about it and I know what I do isn't what people assume.


This

I call them princess profiles and report them for spamming if they are obvious enough which most seem to be. I don't understand why guys are having such a hard time seeing them for what they are and moving on.




littlewonder -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (2/1/2013 3:39:06 PM)

I just don't see the big deal. You have two ADULTS....both CONSENTING. So, really....who cares? It's not like anyone is stealing from another. If I'm selling fake purses on the street and someone comes up to me and buys one, I did not force them to buy it. They more than willingly bought it. I never had to tell them it might be fake or it might be made by slaves in Indonesia or they might be stolen. That's their problem, not mine. If you buy something and you don't do your own homework, that's YOUR responsiblity, not the other person's.

Thus, what's the big deal? If you can't be an adult, then get a guardian.

I am so very tired of seeing people who think mommy and daddy and the entire world should protect them from their own choices.





disretion7 -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (2/1/2013 3:53:01 PM)

Dominance and submission was even a topic that came up on ABC Nightline about 15 years ago, if from an anthropology perspective, but, also, helps explain the pro-Domme phenomenon. The vast majority of today's women evolved to be submissive because their survival was often contingent upon submitting to a Dominant male willing both to fend for and protect them. After the birth of their children, however, prehistoric women often shifted allegiance towards submissive males who were more gentle in helping them raise children. So males evolved more evenly split between being Dominant and submissive. The result is that submissive (AND Dominant) males outnumber naturally Dominant women by a great majority and I've seen figures that say anywhere between 20-30 males must compete for the attention of any one Domme, accordingly. So, it is not surprising that some Dommes would turn their numerical advantage into a cottage industry either to help pay for necessities or luxuries. Given the numerical disparity, the argument about whether pro-Dommes are authentically Dominant or just naturally submissive women taking financial advantage, would seem to be a moot point, except insofar as the quality of the D/s experience they provide. As a male sub, I've been very lucky to be able to submit to Dommes who could, at least, ACT authentic, if they weren't really. Either way, I know that most guys my age, or even half my age, are up against a numerical disparity that results in either pro-Domme or no Domme.

So, whatever, the purist arguments, if most guys only get to submit at an hourly rate, or not at all, I imagine that pro-Domination is around to stay.




TNDommeK -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (2/1/2013 4:28:36 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lee1979


quote:

ORIGINAL: Rochsub2009
but is this really different from the societal norm that says that the man should pay?


I agree with pretty much everything you said except this bit. I really don't think this is even remotely true in the modern world and have been on plenty of vanilla dates and never once did the girl feel it was acceptable to expect me to pay for everything.


D.L. Hugely said " that lobster dinner comes with a side of dick" lol
But in response to your post, I guess I'm different. Aside from being a fin domme, if a man asked me to dinner, I fully expect him pay. I know I might be alone in this, but it's simply how things are done here.




littlewonder -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (2/1/2013 6:02:29 PM)

Nope. We've had this discussion before. The newer generation seems to be very different from most of us in the older generation.

As I've said, it doesn't matter to me who asks who out. I'm old fashioned. I expect the man to pay but then again, I never ever asked a man out. They also did the asking.




TNDommeK -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (2/1/2013 6:05:41 PM)

Exactly, I guess we were just raised different. I always lived by the an opens doors, pays for dinner, a kiss goodnight. If he wants to talk, he will call or text first. I guess I'm blessed to have found a man who agrees.




Page: <<   < prev  41 42 [43] 44 45   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625