RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message

TNDommeK -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (2/7/2013 1:25:21 PM)

This^^



mnottertail -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (2/7/2013 1:26:21 PM)

We need to set up a Pro-Am tournament for youse guys.




TheLilSquaw -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (2/7/2013 1:31:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MistressSnow

OMG!!!! 48 pages of this crap? Really people, are you THAT bored? "fin dommes" (or I would like say fish dummies), are an insult to true working pro-dommes. Period.



Really?
I find that funny since I am both a lifestyle and proswitch.
Who practices financial domination as both a pro and a lifestyler.

As I have said before I don't even find the 18 yr old bratty princesses an insult to ME as a proswitch or someone who practices financial domination because they are not a reflection on me.

The only person who can ruin MY name, MY reputation.
Is ME.





TNDommeK -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (2/7/2013 1:48:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

We need to set up a Pro-Am tournament for youse guys.




What are da rulez? [8D]



TheLilSquaw -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (2/7/2013 1:51:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

We need to set up a Pro-Am tournament for youse guys.





Details please?? Lol



mnottertail -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (2/7/2013 1:51:17 PM)

I wanna see who can land the biggest whoppers.   Let's say we do something like.....get your profile up and linked on the other side, say a $1000 entry fee, and I will cage the bucks, declare the winner, and will have to have you on cam showing your tits and ass to make sure you aren't giving out blowjobs, and prostituting to get the money.

Biggest purse at say the end of 1 week gets $500.  Second, a set of steak knives. 



TheLilSquaw -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (2/7/2013 1:55:16 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I wanna see who can land the biggest whoppers.   Let's say we do something like.....get your profile up and linked on the other side, say a $1000 entry fee, and I will cage the bucks, declare the winner, and will have to have you on cam showing your tits and ass to make sure you aren't giving out blowjobs, and prostituting to get the money.

Biggest purse at say the end of 1 week gets $500.  Second, a set of steak knives. 


LMFCAO



MistressSnow -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (2/7/2013 1:56:49 PM)

I absolutely speak for myself. Why should I speak for anyone else. A rational person, would know this on these forums. Sorry did that presume too much?



mnottertail -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (2/7/2013 2:02:43 PM)

In any large gathering, to presume anything is a presumption.

Nobody here as a rational person, would presume you to be rational out of hand, if you take my point.

For example, I am not naive, just shallow.

Ron



Nelee -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (2/7/2013 2:26:53 PM)

You obviously speak for yourself, and you showcased your ignorance in the process. Any rational person would be willing to set their prejudices aside and actually read the thread and respond to the issues noted before tossing their opinion around. You're no longer just "speaking for yourself" and free from criticism when you start to call people "fish dummies", "fakes", and "low lives" because of their choice in kink. I presumed that a rational person would know the difference.

Oh wait, sorry, did I presume too much?



Rochsub2009 -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (2/7/2013 2:35:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nelee
The way you both refer to women is a bit offensive to me. So. Yeah. Talking about women as if they're prizes to be won isn't cool, guys. Especially when a society run by men is why we can't be in the same positions of power ourselves.


No offense intended. I think I stated that I was making a broad generalization, and that it didn't apply to all women. But I don't think there is anyone on this board who can honestly say that they don't know at least one woman who is unduly attracted to rich guys. Perhaps there's even a sound reason for that attraction (a belief that he can provide financial security). But I don't think anyone will argue that the phenomenon that I described doesn't exist. ;-)


BTW, the last part of your comment paints women as victims. Some might find THAT to be offensive.

quote:


"Strength" means different things for different people, and different things in different societies.

In our capitalistic society, money may be the quickest (and arguably most efficient way) to gain "strength", but it is not the only way.


I agree completely. However, I was only using money and beauty as analogs for power, since those are the two things that are in play when it comes to financial domination. Typically, the woman utilizes her beauty (a major source of HER power) to convince the man to hand over his cash (a tangible representation of HIS power).

quote:


TAFKAA is not necessarily wrong, since strength in this society is commonly measured by wealth, and (In America, at least) wealth is power.


I agree with him as well. However, I chose to ignore personal power, positional power, etc. because they weren't really germane to the discussion at hand.

quote:


So, to disagree with you both, I wouldn't say that strength/money is the "end all" for women, as there are other traits we're more than happy to look to for a suitable partner.


Yes. Like my 11 inch.......... Oh, never mind. [:D]



Rochsub2009 -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (2/7/2013 2:40:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TNDommeK
Roch I have a question about your theory, and this also applies to myself. What if the woman in question ( looking at the body builder or millionaire) has money already?


In that case, the theory breaks down. I've admitted that it was a (very) broad generalization.

I don't think that we'll ever see Beyonce or Liz Claiborne be impressed by a man who just bought her a $50 Amazon gift card. Money becomes a much greater source of personal power when one party has significantly more of it than the other party that they're interacting with. [;)]



LadyPact -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (2/7/2013 2:42:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rochsub2009
Yes. Like my 11 inch.......... Oh, never mind. [:D]

Prove it! JK.

Roch, have you considered asking the administration to make this a sticky thread at the top of the forum? For the most part, this has been much better discussion than the random 'findommes suck' thread.




Nelee -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (2/7/2013 2:46:11 PM)

Thanks for clarifying, and I see where you were coming from now. My apologies. And the last comment was more a reference to the "glass ceiling" effect that women in the business world are faced with in regard to advancement verses what men are faced with. Also the fact that women make less than men on average in the same positions, not necessarily saying that women can't get to a place of power on their own.



mnottertail -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (2/7/2013 2:48:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rochsub2009

quote:

ORIGINAL: TNDommeK
Roch I have a question about your theory, and this also applies to myself. What if the woman in question ( looking at the body builder or millionaire) has money already?


In that case, the theory breaks down. I've admitted that it was a (very) broad generalization.

I don't think that we'll ever see Beyonce or Liz Claiborne be impressed by a man who just bought her a $50 Amazon gift card. Money becomes a much greater source of personal power when one party has significantly more of it than the other party that they're interacting with. [;)]



Roch, I am sorry here old bean, but I feel I must disagree with your disagreeing with yourself.  That is exactly it, it is not a matter of impressing someone so much, but the disparity in balance of power.

You can better belive that Beyonce does not return those $50 target giftcards to the sender, she regifts them............or throws them, no matter. 



Rochsub2009 -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (2/7/2013 2:52:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rochsub2009
Yes. Like my 11 inch.......... Oh, never mind. [:D]


Prove it!


If I did that, then your other subs/slaves would simply become envious cucks, while I would rise to alpha status in your harem. [;)]

quote:


Roch, have you considered asking the administration to make this a sticky thread at the top of the forum? For the most part, this has been much better discussion than the random 'findommes suck' thread.


Not really. But it has lasted 50 pages. So that might be a good idea.

Ummmmmmm, how would I go about doing that?



Rochsub2009 -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (2/7/2013 2:55:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
You can better believe that Beyonce does not return those $50 target giftcards to the sender, she regifts them.


Did she tell you that the last time she was giving you a blowjob? [:D]



Rochsub2009 -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (2/7/2013 2:59:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nelee
And the last comment was more a reference to the "glass ceiling" effect that women in the business world are faced with in regard to advancement verses what men are faced with. Also the fact that women make less than men on average in the same positions, not necessarily saying that women can't get to a place of power on their own.


Oh, I understood what you meant. And I agree with you. But I was just pointing out that some might say that your point paints women as victims, since they have to rely on men to promote them or pay them more.

Don't let Awareness/TAFKAA hear you making statements like that. It will only encourage him. [;)]



absolutchocolat -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (2/7/2013 3:09:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nelee
And the last comment was more a reference to the "glass ceiling" effect that women in the business world are faced with in regard to advancement verses what men are faced with. Also the fact that women make less than men on average in the same positions, not necessarily saying that women can't get to a place of power on their own.


Slightly off topic, but as a woman -- a black woman -- glass ceilings ain't never stopped me because the sky is the limit. Undoubtedly, glass ceilings are shattering in the 21st century, and the sooner women realize just how much power we have -- in numbers, in buying power, in sheer strength...the better. I'm sorry, but I have always had my sights on being the first female president of the US, and I didn't quite get there yet, but I'm still truckin'. Getting into Harvard was the first step...next step, law school or Westpoint! [;)]

Also, I second making this a sticky. Where is the Goddess VAA? Surely, she has been reading this long-ass thread.



Rochsub2009 -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (2/7/2013 3:21:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MistressSnow
OMG!!!! 48 pages of this crap?


Did you even bother to read the thread? I think it's been a much better discussion than most of the findom threads that we see around here (even though those threads are typically significantly shorter than this one).

quote:


Really people, are you THAT bored?


Ummmmm, unless I'm mistaken, you're here commenting on the thread with us. Are you THAT bored?

quote:


"fin dommes" (or I would like say fish dummies), are an insult to true working pro-dommes. Period.


But some in this thread have also called pro-Dommes "prostitutes", "whores", and "hookers". So the distinction that you're making isn't universally accepted.

Some seem to believe that if money is involved in your kink, then it's inherently tainted.

quote:


However that being said I think the stupid pieces of shit who actually send these fakes anything are more pathetic, than the fish.


You're entitled to your opinion. Just like they're entitled to send their money to findoms. But why call them names?

To be honest with you, I still don't understand why sending money to a findom is more objectionable than eating someone's feces, being beat to the point of blood, being pissed on, Being verbally degraded and humiliated, being taken for a walk on a leash like a dog (in public), or having your penis smashed with a hammer. Yet, many of you seem to have identified financial domination as far more vile and objectionable than any of the kinks I just mentioned. I find that rather baffling.

In truth, financial domination seems relatively tame to me. If it were up to me, I'd gladly send an Amazon gift if it would prevent her from smashing my penis with a hammer. But that's just me.



Page: <<   < prev  47 48 [49] 50 51   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
4.711914E-02