RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message

PeonForHer -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (11/1/2013 12:07:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Charles6682
This is the never ending thread.


That inspired me to a song:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gL1hC7Vt6Hw



TNDommeK -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (11/1/2013 12:43:05 PM)

I thought the same thing!!!!!!



Blonderfluff -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (11/1/2013 12:45:23 PM)

GREAT
now it's stuck in my head.

Lang with that little dude flying on the furry white doggy thing.

Sheesh !!!! ;)



PeonForHer -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (11/1/2013 1:20:18 PM)

Nice new avatar, Hotlips! [:)]



Ariluna -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (11/1/2013 11:43:28 PM)

:)



TNDommeK -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (11/2/2013 3:18:38 AM)

Thanks for the contribution, I think....



Charles6682 -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (11/2/2013 3:10:53 PM)

That's exactly what I was thinking of when I said this is the Neverending thread. Well, the movie anyway's. The song goes with it.


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: Charles6682
This is the never ending thread.


That inspired me to a song:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gL1hC7Vt6Hw




ResidentSadist -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (11/2/2013 3:17:28 PM)

It's not really a 90 page thread. There are 85 pages of veiled pro Findom adverts from a couple of Findoms and 5 pages of comments from the rest of us.



TNDommeK -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (11/3/2013 1:57:33 AM)

There were a few of us who never advertised anything. I retorted to questions and accusations.
My profile is for advertising.
;)



ResidentSadist -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (11/3/2013 12:34:54 PM)

ROFLMNAO . . .
Saying "My profile is for advertising" on a forum is advertizing on the forum ya' think?
Saying you are a "working Fin Domme" in your signature is advertizing on the forums, ya' think?
Spamming the forums with 5,892 posts that have adverts in your signature and littering pay piggy topics to the point you will often be the majority of replies on that thread . . . that is advertizing ya' think?

I don't know who you are trying to sell that "never advertised anything" horseshit to, but don't you dare insult my intellect with your moronic claims of purity or motive 2 inches above the advert in your sig. You are obviously here for business. I don't have anything against a working girl making a living but don't try and lie to me about abusing the TOS and think you will get away with it. You are conducting business right now by spamming your advertizing in yet another meaningless reply to get your name and profession out there. Don't insult me and then wink at me . . . save your flirtations for the mods who have graciously allowed you to spam your adverts all over these forums.



TNDommeK -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (11/3/2013 1:27:03 PM)

Wow, seems I touched a nerve.

No, I'm not advertising. My sig lines are sarcastic retorts to idiotic
claims of previous posters. As I have stated before,
I have enough subs, and actually am not taking on new
ones at the moment.

Insult your intelligence? It looks like you're doing a fine job of that
on your own. It's clear with my 5000+ posts, that I'm here
to enjoy the forums and topics. I'm on this thread more than others bc this happens to be a thread I'm interested in, thus why I post all the time on it...see how that works?
As a matter of fact I'm on this side more than the other.
The winky face was because I actually like you as a poster and
didn't want to come off like a bitch... One of us should at least have class, guess that's me.
I didn't insult you, I simply stated my case and put a winky face. Meaning, you might have been talking about other fin dommes but I know for myself and Allison, and maybe a few other fin Domme here...we haven't advertised anything.
Moronic claims, cute words from someone who clearly hasn't read the thread. I never claimed purity, no one here is
Claiming that. I hold up for everything I do, and defend what I don't do.
As far as violating TOS, I'm sure the mods are smart enough to determine
if and when I'm doing that.
Spamming for business...that's cute as well. If I'm advertising for business, I'm horrible at it.lol well, now I know. Thanks for telling me everything I was doing, cause I was clueless. [8|]
I'm sorry you seem to have such a negative view on fin dommes,
but really it's not cute when you stomp your foot.
Damn...and I held you in such high regard on these forums. To be honest, I still do. You just have the wrong idea as to what advertising for business is.
Try going on the intros and reading what those fin dommes post..that would be advertising.



RumpusParable -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (11/3/2013 1:38:23 PM)

Now, now. You knooow you can't be a findom *and* be open about it and enjoy the forums. *Especially* when there is a thread about a subject specifically of interest regarding your kinks and life!



TNDommeK -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (11/3/2013 1:42:49 PM)

I know right! Lol
God forbid, a fin Domme has a kink or an interest on a public forum. :)
~thanks~



KYsissy -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (11/3/2013 2:19:55 PM)

resident Sadist, I never took her signature as an advertisement. I can see why you might say that, but in my view that is a LOOONG stretch.

Just my opinion FWIW



TNDommeK -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s?i (11/3/2013 2:49:30 PM)

Yea they were meant to be funnies.
The "working fin domme" one is a play on
the redundant accusations of us being jobless.
The "con artist, swindler" line was what I was
called one day and found it hilarious, so I kept it.




TheLadyLayla -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (11/4/2013 7:35:09 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MissKittyDeVine

I didn't see your 'old' profile, Layla, but as a Grammar Domme I approve of your demand for correct grammar and spelling [:D]

One other change you would be wise to make: remove the mention of tribute. It's against TOS to refer to money/payment/tribute/amazon wishlists etc. There are those who delight in reporting Fin and Pro dommes, so don't give them the satisfaction.


Thanks :) And really if English is your first language I don't understand why correct spelling and grammar is so difficult.



Ilyrium -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (11/4/2013 7:40:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheLadyLayla
if English is your first language I don't understand why correct spelling and grammar is so difficult.


Thanks for pointing that out. The grammar and spelling on some of these posts doesn't even deserve to be in a third-grade elementary school classroom!



TNDommeK -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (11/4/2013 11:32:03 AM)

I use a few text speak phrases (which I know some of you want to kill me for) but with today's technology, I'm not understanding how misspelled words occur. Don't y'all have a red squiggly line under words that aren't correct? I do....when I misspell something.



dink22 -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (11/4/2013 5:12:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist

It's not really a 90 page thread. There are 85 pages of veiled pro Findom adverts from a couple of Findoms and 5 pages of comments from the rest of us.


That's a pretty accurate analysis.



dink22 -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (11/4/2013 5:15:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TNDommeK

Wow, seems I touched a nerve.



Right. He touched YOUR nerve and called you for exactly what you were.



Page: <<   < prev  88 89 [90] 91 92   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625