Cut off Pockets

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

Cut off Pockets

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> Cut off Pockets

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Cut off Pockets - 9/4/2012 7:42:37 AM

blinktoomuch

Posts: 9
Joined: 12/20/2009
Status: offline

I once talked with a master who wanted all his subs to cut the pockets out of their jeans, and ever since this has intrigued me.

Has anyone ever done this / made their subs to this? What's the purpose? I can't imagine living without pockets...

Profile

Post #: 1

RE: Cut off Pockets - 9/4/2012 8:01:50 AM

GreedyTop

Posts: 52100
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Savannah, GA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: blinktoomuch

I once talked with a master who wanted all his subs to cut the pockets out of their jeans, and ever since this has intrigued me.

Has anyone ever done this / made their subs to this? What's the purpose? I can't imagine living without pockets...

I wouldn't. I like pockets, too.

_____________________________

polysnortatious
Supreme Goddess of Snark
CHARTER MEMBER: Lance's Fag Hags!
Waiting for my madman in a Blue Box.

(in reply to blinktoomuch)

Profile

Post #: 2

RE: Cut off Pockets - 9/4/2012 8:06:03 AM

KYsissy

Posts: 781
Joined: 5/12/2005
Status: offline

I am guessing it is for easy access

_____________________________

"If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went."
Will Rogers, 1897-1935

(in reply to GreedyTop)

Profile

Post #: 3

RE: Cut off Pockets - 9/4/2012 8:09:42 AM

xssve

Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline

So they can play pocket pool?

Yeah, be easier yet if they wore skirts.

_____________________________

Walking nightmare...

(in reply to KYsissy)

Profile

Post #: 4

RE: Cut off Pockets - 9/4/2012 8:51:16 AM

plesto

Posts: 49
Joined: 7/2/2012
Status: offline

No pockets

(in reply to xssve)

Profile

Post #: 5

RE: Cut off Pockets - 9/4/2012 9:11:40 AM

ChatteParfaitt

Posts: 6562
Joined: 3/22/2011
From: The t'aint of the Midwest -- Indiana
Status: offline

I guess I've found a new hard limit. I'm one of those females who has serious envy for male clothing, b/c it tends to be so practical. When was the last time you saw a pair of pants meant for males that *didn't* have pockets? Unless they were something special, like ski slacks?

Whereas females are supposed to go around w/o pockets on a daily basis, and I have yet to figure out why. I know who to dress up and all, I don't *have* to have pockets in my evening or cocktail gown, but for everyday wear, hell yeah, I want a pocket.

As far as the OP, I have no fucking idea, except weirdness. For easy access skirts work better, plus I've never met a male dom who didn't like skirts.

_____________________________

(in reply to blinktoomuch)

Profile

Post #: 6

RE: Cut off Pockets - 9/4/2012 9:44:01 AM

doctorgrey

Posts: 373
Status: offline

I think I have a couple of pairs of strides with pockets removed.
In case she needs to check my lose change.

DrG

(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)

Profile

Post #: 7

RE: Cut off Pockets - 9/4/2012 9:44:34 AM

IronWithVelvet

Posts: 15
Joined: 3/13/2012
Status: offline

Hmmmm. Maybe the no pocket thing is about denying the slave the ability to carry or even have their own possessions, like keys and money in order to keep them totally dependent upon and under the thumb of their Master. It would make it harder to bail out if you couldn't have or even have a place to hide or carry any emergency funds. Still scratching my head over this.

(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)

Profile

Post #: 8

RE: Cut off Pockets - 9/4/2012 10:11:45 AM

AthenaSurrenders

Posts: 3582
Joined: 3/15/2012
Status: offline

fast reply

The OP is a gay male sub. So assuming the rule in question was aimed at male subs, jeans without pockets would be more discrete on a day-to-day basis than having them in easy-access skirts.

That said, this would annoy me. I would constantly be putting my keys in there only to have them drop out my trouser leg.

_____________________________

Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?

(in reply to IronWithVelvet)

Profile

Post #: 9

RE: Cut off Pockets - 9/4/2012 10:14:09 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

well sew them shut where the pocket material meets the jean or slacks material, and the patch pockets can be sewn shut in the trim stitching at the top.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to AthenaSurrenders)

Profile

Post #: 10

RE: Cut off Pockets - 9/4/2012 10:17:08 AM

ChatteParfaitt

Posts: 6562
Joined: 3/22/2011
From: The t'aint of the Midwest -- Indiana
Status: offline

TY Athena, I (obviously) didn't bother to check the profile. In this case I think the gender is crucial.

It makes more sense to sew the pocket shut. Other than that, I got nothing.

_____________________________

(in reply to AthenaSurrenders)

Profile

Post #: 11

RE: Cut off Pockets - 9/4/2012 10:23:22 AM

AthenaSurrenders

Posts: 3582
Joined: 3/15/2012
Status: offline

Unless of course easy access is the point, in which case sewing them shut would make it ever harder to get in.

_____________________________

Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?

(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)

Profile

Post #: 12

RE: Cut off Pockets - 9/4/2012 10:32:36 AM

Jaquin

Posts: 156
Joined: 12/12/2011
Status: offline

I've heard about if you cut the bottoms out of pockets the person can slip their own hands in and be handcuffed; thus it just looks like your hands are in your pockets but you're actually bound walking around.

Of course in the context I heard this it was in a jacket not in jeans.

_____________________________

"The feeling of freedom, and freedom denied."

(in reply to AthenaSurrenders)

Profile

Post #: 13

RE: Cut off Pockets - 9/4/2012 10:34:56 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AthenaSurrenders

Unless of course easy access is the point, in which case sewing them shut would make it ever harder to get in.

Tear off the zipper, thats where the action is for that.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to AthenaSurrenders)

Profile

Post #: 14

RE: Cut off Pockets - 9/4/2012 11:04:34 AM

JanahX

Posts: 3443
Joined: 8/21/2010
Status: offline

Not sure what the point is - its not like everyone wont know that youre jerking yourself off anyways -

_____________________________

The first rule of Fight Club is you do not talk about Fight Club.

The second rule of Fight Club is you do not talk about Fight Club.

(in reply to blinktoomuch)

Profile

Post #: 15

RE: Cut off Pockets - 9/4/2012 12:18:32 PM

UnownedCOBeauty

Posts: 35
Joined: 9/11/2011
Status: offline

So of course, my sweet, innocent little brain didn't think of sexual favors first when I read this question. The first thought I had was "probably because pockets make you look fat." That sounds weird, I know. But I've often wished that certain pants I've owned in the past didn't have pockets. They stick out at the tops or clump funny at the bottom. If you notice, women's dress pants don't have pockets, only 'mockets' that are sewn shut. They give the illusion a pocket is there but there's no bulk.

Now, if the original Dom wanted his subs to cut pockets out and they were male, it could be for the same reason, especially if he likes his subs super feminine. But then you pervs started talking about sex and I thought "BRILLIANT!" Then I blushed three shades of red imagining it.

Yes, if female, wearing a skirt would be the proper way for either party to explore in, say, a dark movie theater or a park bench. But if male, then pants or shorts sans pockets would definitely be the way to accomplish the same feat -- A risque tryst with a higher percentage of getting caught. Be still my beating adrenaline!

_____________________________

"Submit to you --
could that be what you are saying?
the way ripples on the water
submit to an idling wing?" -Ono no Komachi

(in reply to JanahX)

Profile

Post #: 16

RE: Cut off Pockets - 9/4/2012 3:09:55 PM

RaspberryLemon

Posts: 422
Joined: 7/18/2011
Status: offline

Oh God I'd be so mad if I had to do that. I love having nice big pockets. Which is why I can't stand most women's pants--no pockets! Either that, or they have those teeny tiny pockets that you can't even fit a wallet or cellphone in. What's the point?! So incredibly impractical. That's why I always wear men's pants. Pockets pockets pockets. <3

So maybe he just made them cut out the pockets to piss them off. Heck if I know why they'd do that.

(in reply to blinktoomuch)

Profile

Post #: 17

RE: Cut off Pockets - 9/4/2012 3:34:49 PM

LanceHughes

Posts: 4737
Joined: 2/12/2004
Status: offline

(1) 'Tis a bit of a humiliation to be ordered to jerk-off while in public.
(2) Some men do not like to sport a woody and to be told to "Get it up, boy," might be just the thing. We have thread after thread of: "How do I humiliate my sub without involving the public w/o their consent."

< Message edited by LanceHughes -- 9/4/2012 3:36:09 PM >

_____________________________

"Train 'em the right way - my way." Lance Hughes
"Advice is what we ask for when we already know the answer, but wish we didn't." Erica Jong

10 fluffy points
50 nz points

Member: VAA's posse

(in reply to RaspberryLemon)

Profile

Post #: 18

RE: Cut off Pockets - 9/4/2012 7:14:21 PM

RumpusParable

Posts: 1923
Joined: 7/7/2005
From: NYC now!
Status: offline

I could see it as a fun on-going game.

_____________________________

Relationships come and go, but plastination is forever.

I generally use fast-reply. If directing my post at someone specific I will indicate so.

Minimal summary: Artist, Disabled Veteran, Vegan, Pornographer, and Agender dominant female.

(in reply to LanceHughes)

Profile

Post #: 19

RE: Cut off Pockets - 9/4/2012 9:51:53 PM

Darkfeather

Posts: 1142
Joined: 3/13/2007
Status: offline

As for why most women's clothing have no or fake pockets, it started as more of a fashion/practical reason. Since most clothes of old were altered to fit in some way, pockets on women were seen as a means to ruin that perfect cut (put something in that pocket and the carefully tapered line gets ruined). More practically, the designers felt that since women had purses, they didn't need pockets to carry things. This is also why most men's clothing have large pockets, because we were expected to carry everything in them. There have been many attempts to change the status quo though(anyone remember fanny packs?)

(in reply to RumpusParable)

Profile

Post #: 20