RE: The thrill is gone (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


servantforuse -> RE: The thrill is gone (9/10/2012 8:10:37 PM)

Obama is ruining the nation. He is spending us into oblivian.




tazzygirl -> RE: The thrill is gone (9/10/2012 8:12:57 PM)

very true Hill.




TheHeretic -> RE: The thrill is gone (9/10/2012 8:14:32 PM)

I've run across a few pundits making the "Romney in a landslide," prediction, Michael. I saw one today claiming that the Carter/Reagan race of '80 was roughly where we are today, at this point.

I don't know. Carter didn't have an elephant in the room, to play with in October.




DaddySatyr -> RE: The thrill is gone (9/10/2012 8:15:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Obama is ruining the nation. He is spending us into oblivian.


It's only "spending" if a republican does it. It's "a stimulus package" when a demie does it.



Peace and comfort,



Michael




DomKen -> RE: The thrill is gone (9/10/2012 8:20:37 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Women will not be thrown back to the stone ages. There are laws to protect your right to have an abortion and any thing else you might be worried about.

What statute would that be precisely and what protects it from SCOTUS?




DaddySatyr -> RE: The thrill is gone (9/10/2012 8:21:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

I've run across a few pundits making the "Romney in a landslide," prediction, Michael. I saw one today claiming that the Carter/Reagan race of '80 was roughly where we are today, at this point.

I don't know. Carter didn't have an elephant in the room, to play with in October.


I have made that comparison, too and I think the "feeling" is close to that but, I think that the election results won't be the same.

I talk to employees every day in many different industries - some of them that have voted democratic all their lives - that are gnashing their teeth and realizing that they may have to "bite the bullet" and vote for the guy that might be able to help the economy instead of the one that's proven that he can't.

I personally know people that have told me: "This time, you might be right".

Carter had a lot of "baggage" that he brought into that election and one of the things was that he throttled Ford on the economy and did nothing to improve it. Look up the term "misery index". It was a term that Carter invented in '76 that Reagan successfully used against him in '80.



Peace and comfort,



Michael




servantforuse -> RE: The thrill is gone (9/10/2012 8:23:13 PM)

If the court wanted to reverse roe vs. wade, they would have done so already.




littlewonder -> RE: The thrill is gone (9/10/2012 8:28:20 PM)

Here in MD, Obama still has the vote of the minorities and young adults. To be honest, I know very few who will vote for Romney except for those who are extreme republicans, racists and rednecks who ride around in their pickup trucks yelling "YEEHAH".




servantforuse -> RE: The thrill is gone (9/10/2012 8:31:37 PM)

You forgot to mention the confederate flag and shotgun in the pick up truck window.




littlewonder -> RE: The thrill is gone (9/10/2012 8:37:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

You forgot to mention the confederate flag and shotgun in the pick up truck window.

Those too but I've never seen those types in MD, only in Western PA where I grew up and I rarely ever go back to for those reasons.




DaddySatyr -> RE: The thrill is gone (9/10/2012 8:40:30 PM)

This works (Although Barack's "Misery Index" is only at 10.75 to be fair)



Peace and comfort,



Michael


[image]local://upfiles/1271250/65EFE8B50D604E51913E81CFF46163A7.jpg[/image]




TheHeretic -> RE: The thrill is gone (9/10/2012 9:21:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder

Here in MD, Obama still has the vote of the minorities and young adults.



He won't have their vote, until they actually show up on a Tuesday in November, Littlewonder.




DomKen -> RE: The thrill is gone (9/10/2012 9:51:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

If the court wanted to reverse roe vs. wade, they would have done so already.

Maybe you're unawar that the composition of the Court can change?




graceadieu -> RE: The thrill is gone (9/10/2012 9:54:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Women will not be thrown back to the stone ages. There are laws to protect your right to have an abortion and any thing else you might be worried about.


Sure. Laws the Democrats fought for and the Republicans opposed. Laws that Republicans continue to campaign against, even. I like my rights. That's one of the reasons I vote Democrat.




erieangel -> RE: The thrill is gone (9/10/2012 9:57:24 PM)

Last week, both Romney's campaign as well as Rove's super-PAC pulled all their money out of PA and two other swing states. Right now, there are 9 states truly in play where the election will be decided: Florida, Ohio, NC, Virginia, WI, Iowa, Colorado, Nevada and NH.

No Republican has ever won the presidency without Ohio and the road to 270 is certainly tight for Romney to get there. If Obama get either FL or Ohio he will probably win; if Obama wins both those states but loses the other in play states, Romney loses.

Since the conventions, Romney hasn't gotten a boost at all, according to Gallup daily tracking while Obama has enjoyed a 3+ boost in the polling.

Nate Silver, who called the '08 election for Obama during the primaries, has called it for Obama. As did Booman Tribune. And George Will wrote off Romney way back in March.

http://www.alternet.org/hot-news-views/predicting-election-will-it-be-close-people-think?akid=9369.286161.Y3hyRF&rd=1&src=newsletter707734&t=2

http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2012/9/10/192510/516

http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2012/9/10/10374/8050

http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2012/09/10/rasmussen-confirms-gallup-strong-obama-bump/?cxntfid=blogs_jay_bookman_blog

In short, Romney is losing. Romney knows it. Why don't his supporters on this board know it?





TheHeretic -> RE: The thrill is gone (9/10/2012 9:58:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: graceadieu
Sure. Laws the Democrats fought for and the Republicans opposed.



The First Amendment? Really?




Owner59 -> RE: The thrill is gone (9/10/2012 9:58:35 PM)

Poor Mitt.......[:D]


Must really suck being stuck with him......




TheHeretic -> RE: The thrill is gone (9/10/2012 10:00:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: erieangel
Why don't his supporters on this board know it?





Because we don't get emails from the Truth Team?




DaddySatyr -> RE: The thrill is gone (9/10/2012 10:01:11 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: graceadieu

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Women will not be thrown back to the stone ages. There are laws to protect your right to have an abortion and any thing else you might be worried about.


Sure. Laws the Democrats fought for and the Republicans opposed. Laws that Republicans continue to campaign against, even. I like my rights. That's one of the reasons I vote Democrat.


You like your rights but how do you feel about the rights of others?

I harken back to Clinton attempting an assault on the 1st amendment when he floated the notion of calling talk radio part of the "vast right wing conspiracy" and trying to call it "hate speech". How about that right?

How about gun control? Laws which almost invariably are proposed by democrats?

How about drug testing? Or breathalyzers being a direct violation of the 4th Amendment?

More importantly (and the one that democrats are constantly chipping away at): How about the tenth that was written to prevent the federalization of this country?

It's all well and good to say: "I like my rights" but part of the responsibility of having those rights is not violating the rights of others; something democratic law-makers do with scary regularity.



Peace and comfort,



Michael




graceadieu -> RE: The thrill is gone (9/10/2012 10:04:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder

Here in MD, Obama still has the vote of the minorities and young adults.



He won't have their vote, until they actually show up on a Tuesday in November, Littlewonder.


Maryland isn't going to go for Romney. It's not a swing state, it's not really in play. IIRC, we've gone Republican twice since the 50s. Even if minority turnout is down a bit, and I haven't seen any evidence of that, I don't see that making a bit of difference.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625