RE: He's Clearly Vanilla (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


sexyred1 -> RE: He's Clearly Vanilla (9/15/2012 8:05:04 PM)

OP, you know it is supremely annoying to give serious replies based on a life well lived to people like you and when you don't hear what you want to hear, you pronounce certain posters as conveying hostility.

That is such bullshit and truly delusional. No one here is hostile towards; none of us know you or really care all that much, but some of us actually like serious issues on the boards and when applicable, we reply.

You have not answered the questions posed to you and are being fairly dismissive and back pedaling now.

I believe the ladies here gave you good points, do with them what you will, but never for a moment believe you have affected anyone to the point that our words seem "hostile". Honest, yes, direct, yes, hostile, oh hell no.




Dunamis2009 -> RE: He's Clearly Vanilla (9/15/2012 8:41:21 PM)

I mean, someone can view a partner as an equal and a submissive, if that makes sense. I know I do.

I can't really think of anything else to add... Sorry. Hope you find what you're looking for.




Greta75 -> RE: He's Clearly Vanilla (9/15/2012 9:18:32 PM)

Life is often so complicated isn't it. I found my perfect dom, mental, emotional, outside bedroom, everything connects but could not submit fully enough to his desires, so we had to end. I could not submit fully because I guess I am not a slave, just a sub, someone who will always have hard limits.

I recently also met a vanilla man who I have been honest with about my bdsm desires. And vanilla men being vanilla men told me that he could never do that. He likes equal partnership in the bedroom, nobody should be above each other. He definitely refuse to do any the stuffs I told him I like. Yet, his so kind, and loving, and treats me like..., something really precious. I think his such a good guy and should be a keeper, but it's hard to go back to vanilla. Boredom and disinterest in him in the bedroom could end up being a problem. I am not aroused at all in bed if there is no humiliation factor. I'd literally stay dry.

Personally, if I were you and this is exactly what I will do with this vanilla guy. Relationships should be honest. If he is okay with an open relationship where I get my submission somewhere else, it could work. But if it's not something he can accept, then it's just not fair to both parties to even get anywhere deeper. He deserves a vanilla girl.

Look at it this way, if you can't give 100% to him, you are short changing him, let him go. If you choose to commit, then you got to commit to that 100% all the way.





LadyPact -> RE: He's Clearly Vanilla (9/16/2012 3:16:03 AM)

I'm late to the party but I'll throw in My two cents.

I'm not real thrilled with the "regular poster that created a sock" kind of thing. If you are a regular poster, you probably already know what I'm going to tell you. I've been here five years and I've said the same thing all along.

(In My opinion, a regular poster would have known LaT better than you did, but that's just Me being cynical.)

You came here knowing that nobody could answer these questions but YOU. Chances are, you even know why that is. Only you know how high of a priority kink or an authority dynamic is in your life. What good does it do for Me to tell you that I could walk away from all of this any time and just be content with MP as My soul mate? All of this stuff is optional for Me. It always has been. That doesn't help you because I have no idea if it's optional for you or if it's something that is more important to you, instead.

I've walked away from this before. When kink wasn't in My life, I didn't sit in My vanilla world pining away for it. If I gave it up again, the only part that would matter would be that I'd probably lose touch with many of the kinky friends I've made over the years. That sure isn't enough for Me to give up what I have with My other half.

The thing you have to ask yourself is whether or not it's optional for you. Nobody else can answer that. YOU have to look inside yourself and see what the answer is and make your decisions based on that. For Me, when the rubber hits the road, love is enough. The question is, can that be enough for you?




Winterapple -> RE: He's Clearly Vanilla (9/16/2012 4:06:08 AM)

You say you are very much in love with
this man. He's perfect and the sex is
great. But. I'm just going to speculate
on the but.

By perfect I wonder if you mean he
is by most standards a good catch.
An attractive decent stable man
probably with a good income who is
in love with you. A relationship with
him offers you security. You perhaps
are not in love with him or at least
not as in love with him as he is with
you which gives you the upper hand
in the relationship.

Should you be practical and take
this safe bet or should you break
it off and seek a man or men who
excite you more? A much less secure
path that could mean you'll end up
alone without a life partner at the
end of the day.

That's really something you can only
answer for yourself. If the only thing
wrong with this perfect man is he
doesn't fit your ideal of a dominant man
you might want to ponder on why
that's your ideal and what that ideal
means. Then there's the whole he
sees you as an equal thing which you
find a turn off. Personally, I would never
be with a man who didn't see me as
his equal. No matter what the power
dynamic I wouldn't be with a man who
thought I was less of a person than
he was.

But maybe you can only get excited
by men who think otherwise.
You take your chances in life.
What seems perfect to some isn't
to others. But if you decide you
need bdsm and what you identify
as a dominant man you should
lay off the vanilla guys.
Encouraging someone who you
know from the get go isn't what
floats your boat is playing with
their emotions and that's kind of
nasty, heartbreaker.




GreedyTop -> RE: He's Clearly Vanilla (9/16/2012 6:14:36 AM)

WHat LadyP and Winterapple said.




LaTigresse -> RE: He's Clearly Vanilla (9/16/2012 6:25:56 AM)

I think Winterapple brings up a very good point. The love factor.

All too often I've seen women that were.......dismissive.......of a man that was honest with them in their feelings. A good man that wasn't going to fuck them over. A man that loved them and would treat them well. The women dump to go chasing after some womanizing asshole that isn't fit to own a houseplant let alone be in a relationship with another human being.

I wonder.....is THAT the 'not dominant' factor that was eluded to but never actually explained. Even though we did ask on several different posts.




ResidentSadist -> RE: He's Clearly Vanilla (9/16/2012 7:18:19 AM)

All other factors aside, as so many have said, it is a matter of your priorities.

For me, love isn't enough. I am one hell of a lovable guy and I have excellent relationship skills. Finding a fulfilling partner is very easy for me. I can go without a masochistic partner . . . but I cannot go without a slave type partner. I just do not fair well with the negotiations of a submissive for long. I have lived as poly primary pair, triad, quad and more but I cannot live monogamously. I do not often tolerate heterosexual women very well either. This is my framework, my needs.

I once had a dream come true. She brought awesome kids with her into my life, we had a family. She was new to BDSM and she still had rapture. After a few years, she wanted me to go vanilla with her. Slavehood had lost its luster, the rapture faded. It tore out my heart, but as I said to her, "what would I want with a women that wasn't a slave?" There are millions of vanilla unwed mothers that would give up their tits to be with me, why would I go vanilla for the sake of love. Love is the easy part.

But that is me. What is the easy part for you and what you can't live without is something that only you can answer, as already mentioned by others.




LadyHibiscus -> RE: He's Clearly Vanilla (9/16/2012 7:30:05 AM)

Love is not the easy part, RS. Not for many of us anyway.




LaTigresse -> RE: He's Clearly Vanilla (9/16/2012 8:15:39 AM)

I sure as fuck would never give up love and all that goes with it, for me, to have some kink.

That being said, there are certain qualities that a person has before I have that sort of love. I wouldn't have that sort of love for a person that wasn't fairly compatible personality wise. A dominant personality, might be great friends in smallish doses, but to live with them day in and day out.....no. I never even find myself remotely attracted to them in a "OMG that is so hot!" way. On rare occasion, admiration, wanna hang with them, etc....... But it just doesn't trip my love/relationship buttons.

That all being said.......I do tend to struggle to understand how a person that has strong personality traits such as dominance or submissive, could be attracted to someone who's personality wasn't complimentary.




ThrowAway88 -> RE: He's Clearly Vanilla (9/16/2012 10:46:43 AM)

First of all. Thank you all for your time in replying. Again, I appreciate it. I want to reply to everything though I do realize it will blow up this thread. Sorry. I’m going to break it into a few posts to hopefully avoid a wall of text. But I love all these diverse answers and am glad to see them. Thank you. It helps me work through this. Which is what I really need.

quote:

ORIGINAL: lizi

So, I hate to be pushy but I asked before and would like to ask again about how is it exactly that he's not fulfilling you? Post #20. I do think this is pertinent to your situation.


AsmodaisSin really says it better than I probably will but I realize how vague that is. It feels vague. But I’ll try.

I miss that Thing. I miss that clear cut definition of my role. I miss the structure. That extra level of trust and love. I miss being able to solve some tiny problem with a swift punishment. Knowing it’s done and over after without some needless long discussion. I miss the praise for completing tasks. I miss being trained to be exactly what he wants. I just miss fulfilling someone that way. I miss kneeling! That meditative subspace. That clear focus on His Needs. That creative thing that every Dom I’ve ever had possessed. The “surprise- you’re going to be tied to the bed post for an hour because that’s what I want- love you” thing. Those things and a thousand others. It’s just the silly little stuff that definitely adds up. I just want him to appreciate that part of me. That’s all really. Right there.

He is calm rationality and I love that about him. It’s just not in him to be like that.

This came out all jarbled but I tried. It’s in there somewhere and it’s more all at the same time.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus

Yes, he has the ability to leave you. Perhaps there is some deep seated need that you are not providing for him that he hasn't brought up yet. Is that likely?

It is a given, or a virtual given, that NO VANILLA PERSON is going to give you the D/s thing that you crave. Yet here you are, pursuing a vanilla person. Who is set up to fail, purely by existing.


It’s entirely possible. Of course. I hope he talks to me about it if there is something that bothers him, and I believe he does. It would be fantastic if there were something. I’d jump at the chance to fulfill it.

I don’t know that I’d say No Vanilla Person is ever going to fulfill that. I could have ended up with someone who, though I found in a vanilla way, ended up loving that I’m submissive. I’ve had that happen before too and it was beautiful.

I guess I wondered after reading some of this, if the advice here and what I’m being chastised for, is to always always always date through kinky avenues. I’m probably not going to do that. I don’t think that makes me a bad person. There have been responses here that have made me feel like I’m conniving and mean-spirited. But after a little time away, knowing my own situation and myself, I let that go. I’m not a bad person and haven’t done anything malicious.

I kind needed to just get that out. I recognize that it doesn’t 100% fit with what you’ve asked but I’m glad I put it here. Thanks.




ThrowAway88 -> RE: He's Clearly Vanilla (9/16/2012 10:48:32 AM)

(I guess I can't chunk it out like I'd hoped. So... giant wall of text it is....)

quote:

ORIGINAL: graceadieu

I tried that, a few times, before I realized that I just can't date vanilla anymore, at least as a primary relationship. It's too likely to end in heartbreak. It's kind of unfortunate, because it narrows the dating pool tremendously, but I need what I need. (And for what it's worth, I still don't really approach dating - if I'm looking for a relationship - as "kink first". I think I still approach it "love first", I just vet out people who aren't dominant.)

I suspect that you're going to be in the same boat, where your ongoing unfulfilled emotional needs will fester into unhappiness. And I'm sorry about that. But have you tried laying out to him exactly, in detail, what it is that you need from him? It's possible that even if he doesn't "get it" all the way at first, he might get into it. At least enough to keep you happy.


Thanks for this. I think that’s exactly what I’ve been wondering. If we’ll grow together here as we have everywhere else in our relationship. And it has to a certain point. He knows things I like in bed, when to be rough, how I like to be spanked, tied up etc. And since he’s grown there it has made me wonder and hope, probably, that it’ll grow more. And I don’t know that it won’t but I’m at the point where I’m starting to doubt it.

It’s pretty typical relationship stuff. Vanilla or not. And I’m just looking for a safe place to think it all through out loud. I’m grateful for the place to do so.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SlipSlidingAway

Your submission means more to you than you realized. It was likely time with someone who was not wired to react to it that helped bring that to your attention. I don't agree that you are at fault for attempting to have a relationship with him. We all learn about ourselves on a continuing basis. You know more about you now than you did going into it. The thing is, what do you do with that new knowledge?

Chances are things are not going to end up happily. I hate to burst bubbles, and be all realistic and stuff, but people don't change that much. So, he's pretty much who he is, you are pretty much who you are, and if those two people don't jive in some rather significant way? It's likely going to cause relationship discord at some point in time. You both deserve to be with someone who can appreciate ALL the parts of you, at least all of the important ones. And since you are here posting? I'm going to say this one is pretty important to you.



Thanks. You’re pretty dead on. All I can really do is talk to him about it, of course, but I kind of had to get my thoughts straight. I don’t think I realized, or perhaps I’d just forgotten, how important this is to me. I don’t expect anyone to be perfect but I need to be able to express love this way. It’s a little like suffocating. In an unfun kind of way.

He definitely deserves someone who will appreciate him for exactly who he is as do I. And I do. God he’s amazing. I just need a little more and it makes me feel terribly guilty.


quote:

ORIGINAL: AsmodaisSin

I haven't posted in a while but this OP really tugged at my heart strings. I went through almost the exact same situation about seven years ago. The only difference was that I was still accepting my submissive nature. The vanilla guy I was with at the time was perfect for me in almost every other way. The only problem? He wasn't a Dom and he couldn't satisfy me the way that only my Daddy could. This vanilla guy tried, though. I was honest and upfront with him once I realized everything going on with myself. At one point, I actually laughed in his face. It was an awful feeling afterward. I apologized and we went our separate ways.

I know what you're trying to say. He's not a Dom. He doesn't approach you the way you need, he doesn't look at you the way you need; he doesn't speak to you the way you need. Dom/Dommes are a totally different animal.

If you want to stick with him, that's your choice, but I believe you're only fooling yourself. I tried sticking around with my vanilla guy. I even asked for advice here just like you. Every response, for the most part, parallels everything I was once told.

I know that some kinky people make those kinds of relationships work. You have to figure out inside yourself if he'll be able to handle that.
Talk to him. Be truly honest, because right now, you are just fooling yourself.

My thoughts and prayers are with you though.

-mel


Thanks for this. Truly. It helps to read that others have been here. It’s a tough place. I want to do and be the right thing. But it’s hard. You’ve said it well and all I can add is... thank you.

quote:

ORIGINAL: KYsissy

"Perfect". How often in life do we find this? I married Miss Pretty Damn Good. 10 years later she is miss Perfect, for me. No my wildest fantasies are not fulfilled. But in the big scheme, they are not that important. Besides, if they were fulfilled, I would just think up new ones.


Great response. Gives me some perspective and made me laugh. Thank you. And congratulations. You sound very content. That’s a wonderful thing.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alecta
bit of a throwaway suggestion, why not bombard him with passages from the Fifty Shades series that particularly excite you? It's mainstream enough that it wouldn't be a BDSM hardsell, and it might be just what he needs to ignite his imagination and interest?


Funny thing is... I haven’t read it. I’ve read all the other BDSM classics but this... I don’t know. Maybe it was just bad timing or something. But this is valid and would help when I seem to be without words so frequently. Sometimes I have a hard time being clear and concise so this might help. Thank you for the idea.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BambiBoi

Dear ThrowAway,

I appreciate how hard being torn is. You have a solid relationship in the bag, but the Master of your dreams is in the bush. You want to go hunting, but you don't want to lose the farm. You have my sympathies. I don't think you've done anything wrong by wanting more, but it would be helpful to know what exactly is missing. Is it 24/7 D/s elements? Is it a hardcore sadistic streak? Is he also submissive? The more you can fill in about what's missing, the easier it is to give more than sympathy and hugs.

Let's look at this logically.

(... edited for length....)

In short, despite some very pointed stabs at your current mate, you seem unwaveringly in his arms. Don't throw that away. Lets find a way to build around it.

I respect your anonymity, so if sharing details does not work for you, I understand.




This response got me. Thank you. And I think it made me realize there’s more here that isn’t right than just him being dominant. Maybe I’m putting the label on it and lumping it in when in reality, there’s more that’s not right outside of this.

I would like to add that the only two valid options are the first two. I’d never go behind his back or cheat or any of that. And he wouldn’t go for, nor would I want, some sideline thing.

It is hard. Relationships are hard. It was difficult for me to date looking for a dom ahead of looking for just a good person. Id really like to chosoe my mate based on values and ethics and compatibility first, and have dominance just be there. Which is unrealistic, I suppose. I think, when we met, I was telling myself that I was naturally drawn toward dominant men so it would be fine. He’s the most balanced person I know and displays no dominant characteristics. That’s what’s missing. I love that head of household feeling. I’m just a worshipper. I love great men and he is a great man. He just doesn’t want or need some of the ways I need to express that.

quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1

OP, you know it is supremely annoying to give serious replies based on a life well lived to people like you and when you don't hear what you want to hear, you pronounce certain posters as conveying hostility.

That is such bullshit and truly delusional. No one here is hostile towards; none of us know you or really care all that much, but some of us actually like serious issues on the boards and when applicable, we reply.

You have not answered the questions posed to you and are being fairly dismissive and back pedaling now.

I believe the ladies here gave you good points, do with them what you will, but never for a moment believe you have affected anyone to the point that our words seem "hostile". Honest, yes, direct, yes, hostile, oh hell no.


I’m not trying to be annoying. And for the most part, with all internet communication, I can take the good with the bad and leave the rest.

IMO, Saying “shame on you!” and telling me he deserves better than me is hostile. As is calling me delusional. But perhaps I just define “hostile” differently. Either way, I’ve not taken it too harshly. And I did expect some of the harsh words. In fact, I stated so in my original post so it’s not affecting me too greatly. I treat people differently but it’s ok.

I started this thread to get help. To take a good honest look at my relationship. To backpedal and be dismissive would be counter to what I’m trying to accomplish. If it comes across that way, I apologize. It’s not meant to.

And for the most part, I agree that I’ve gotten excellent responses. Which is why I came. Why I asked for thoughts, ideas, and guidance. To me, this is a very serious issue. I wanted shared experiences and I got them. And I’m grateful.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

Life is often so complicated isn't it.

(...edited for length...)

Look at it this way, if you can't give 100% to him, you are short changing him, let him go. If you choose to commit, then you got to commit to that 100% all the way.




Thank you for sharing. Life is complicated. And I may be experiencing something very similar here though he hasn’t said he won’t do the things I need, but it just isn’t in him.

Know that horrible, awful, thing portrayed on bad television shows, where the wife clearly needs help with something but wants the husband to Want to help with that thing? And by asking for it over and over it becomes obvious that all she really wants is his Desire to help? It’s kind like that. Horrible analogy but I’ll leave it. I want him to Want this and it’s so completely not his fault that he doesn’t. He tries, and I love him for that, maybe it’ll grow but it would have to grow organically from within him and I’m not sure it’s there. I’m not sure he’s not sure it’s not there either. (That’s a mind twister)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

I'm late to the party but I'll throw in My two cents.

I'm not real thrilled with the "regular poster that created a sock" kind of thing. If you are a regular poster, you probably already know what I'm going to tell you. I've been here five years and I've said the same thing all along.

(In My opinion, a regular poster would have known LaT better than you did, but that's just Me being cynical.)

You came here knowing that nobody could answer these questions but YOU. Chances are, you even know why that is. Only you know how high of a priority kink or an authority dynamic is in your life. What good does it do for Me to tell you that I could walk away from all of this any time and just be content with MP as My soul mate? All of this stuff is optional for Me. It always has been. That doesn't help you because I have no idea if it's optional for you or if it's something that is more important to you, instead.

I've walked away from this before. When kink wasn't in My life, I didn't sit in My vanilla world pining away for it. If I gave it up again, the only part that would matter would be that I'd probably lose touch with many of the kinky friends I've made over the years. That sure isn't enough for Me to give up what I have with My other half.

The thing you have to ask yourself is whether or not it's optional for you. Nobody else can answer that. YOU have to look inside yourself and see what the answer is and make your decisions based on that. For Me, when the rubber hits the road, love is enough. The question is, can that be enough for you?



If I could answer those things on my own, I wouldn’t be here. That’s the catch-22.

And I’ve apologized about the throwaway account. I’m sorry. I know it sucks. However, I’m not a Regular Poster. I have been at times, over the years. I’m familiar with you, LaT, and remember Hannah and to go waaaaay back, LuckyAlbatross. She was fantastic- don’t know if she still posts but I liked her style. And so many more. But part of the deal with creating a throwaway is that I can’t expect gracious treatment based on stated membership and familiarity nor can I act like I “know” you all. Because truly I don’t. I’m familiar that’s it, and I do have a great deal of respect for you all and your experiences. Which is why I’m here. And I think I’ve been, have tried to be, respectful. So again, thanks.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Winterapple

You say you are very much in love with
this man. He's perfect and the sex is
great. But. I'm just going to speculate
on the but.

By perfect I wonder if you mean he
is by most standards a good catch.
An attractive decent stable man
probably with a good income who is
in love with you. A relationship with
him offers you security. You perhaps
are not in love with him or at least
not as in love with him as he is with
you which gives you the upper hand
in the relationship.

Should you be practical and take
this safe bet or should you break
it off and seek a man or men who
excite you more? A much less secure
path that could mean you'll end up
alone without a life partner at the
end of the day.

That's really something you can only
answer for yourself. If the only thing
wrong with this perfect man is he
doesn't fit your ideal of a dominant man
you might want to ponder on why
that's your ideal and what that ideal
means. Then there's the whole he
sees you as an equal thing which you
find a turn off. Personally, I would never
be with a man who didn't see me as
his equal. No matter what the power
dynamic I wouldn't be with a man who
thought I was less of a person than
he was.

But maybe you can only get excited
by men who think otherwise.
You take your chances in life.
What seems perfect to some isn't
to others. But if you decide you
need bdsm and what you identify
as a dominant man you should
lay off the vanilla guys.
Encouraging someone who you
know from the get go isn't what
floats your boat is playing with
their emotions and that's kind of
nasty, heartbreaker.



This was great. Thank you for the reply and your thoughts.

I would like to add that while a lot of this applies, his financial standing and that particular type of “security” is not a concern and I’ve never factored that in when dating. Well.... I need someone at least self-sufficient. As I am. I’m financially fine. Better than most my age. He and I have always gone dutch if even more heavily on my side. By being with me, long term, he would stand to benefit greatly. He is stable. As a human and a good person. That matters to me more than any of the other stuff. Good family, wonderful friends, and enjoys his work. Those are the things that matter.

With that out of the way, I’ll address the rest. I’m not sure I stated the “equal partnership” thing very well. I may be emotionally needy. He assures me that I’m the least needy woman he’s ever been with but I can’t help but feel it, considering that I still need more than perhaps he has to offer. I don’t want to be playing with his emotions. Not at all.

Which is why I ‘m writing all of this out. To help me figure out what I need and how to better communicate that to him so we can Both decide if we’re right for each other. I think that’s the responsible, kind thing to do.

If his heart gets broken in the end it won’t be because I was malicious.


quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

I think Winterapple brings up a very good point. The love factor.

All too often I've seen women that were.......dismissive.......of a man that was honest with them in their feelings. A good man that wasn't going to fuck them over. A man that loved them and would treat them well. The women dump to go chasing after some womanizing asshole that isn't fit to own a houseplant let alone be in a relationship with another human being.

I wonder.....is THAT the 'not dominant' factor that was eluded to but never actually explained. Even though we did ask on several different posts.


Definitley not. I’ve had my share of, “womanizing asshole that isn't fit to own a houseplant” (well said) and I’m glad to be done with that chapter. I learned a lot. I learned that, for me, the relationship side is crucial. And I can’t just go for some SuperDom, putting that first. Because when I followed that path it didn’t do me any good. It was fun, but a waste of time.

I want a good person who understands and loves my submissive side. I hope I’ve explained it enough but maybe I haven’t. I’ve tried. I swear. It’s a tough thing to answer. And knowing now just how tough that is, I know I’ve got to figure that out more first. Which is good. I’m glad I know that isn’t as clearly defined in my head as I thought. At the very least, it means that I haven’t’ communicated that with him well enough. I’m glad I know that now and I didn’t. Because if I can’t explain it to you all well, then I obviously haven’t done a good enough job with him. I’m excited to get to talk to him about it. Maybe even just let him read all of this.


quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist

All other factors aside, as so many have said, it is a matter of your priorities.

For me, love isn't enough.

(...edited for length...)

But that is me. What is the easy part for you and what you can't live without is something that only you can answer, as already mentioned by others.


I like this post because it’s so opposite of everything else. Thanks. I’m not sure I’m in that camp but I’m glad to read this. And you’re right. I’m the only one who can figure it out, as many have said. I think I’m getting closer to that. Which is great.


quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

I sure as fuck would never give up love and all that goes with it, for me, to have some kink.

(...edited for length...)

That all being said.......I do tend to struggle to understand how a person that has strong personality traits such as dominance or submissive, could be attracted to someone who's personality wasn't complimentary.


Ah. I think it’s because we’re very very similar. And I love that about him. Instead of finding my compliment, my opposite, I found my mirror. We have similar passions, interests, families, wants, life goals etc. He would be an amazing father and has wonderful expectations of life and long term relationships. I love his viewpoints. I understand them. I understand him. And he understands me.

Except this. Maybe. I think I have to try harder before I’m sure of that.


quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
Sorry to high jack your thread, Poster... Good luck in your choices.


Totally fine. And I wish you well. I’m going to let you guys talk that out and not get involved, if that’s ok. But I don’t mind the hijack. All good.


quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

FFS, you've been here long enough to know how to trim your posts. Please do all of us a favor and use that knowledge.


This made laugh. Considering the sheer volume of what I’m posting/ about to post. I’ve tried to pair it down some while leaving the context... but it’s a lot. And I know that. I apologize. But I really wanted to get this all down and reply to most, if not all, of these responses.

So yeah. I guess my TL;DR is that I have to define what I need better. For me and for him. Then have some good serious conversations. And trust him. We have to figure it out together. But this have given me invaluable insight.

Thank you all so very much.




ChatteParfaitt -> RE: He's Clearly Vanilla (9/16/2012 11:11:44 AM)

I'm glad you're getting some clarity from this thread, throwaway. If nothing else, it will give you some focus for your thinking.

Best, CP




LadyHibiscus -> RE: He's Clearly Vanilla (9/16/2012 11:37:31 AM)

That description of what you loved about your past doms? That's something that comes from...being a dominant. Based on what you've sadi, your mister doesn't SEE your submissive side, he's just not wired that way.

It sounds like you really miss D/s. You miss it now, after how long of a relationship? How much will you miss it a year from now?

Just an FYI, our little crew would give each other the same advice. We don't pull any punches, and while we will call anyone on their bs, we're not here to tear anyone down.




lizi -> RE: He's Clearly Vanilla (9/16/2012 11:43:46 AM)

Thanks for the response. Unfortunately I don't feel that I can get any more specific than I have, now that I see it's truly a matter of personal choice. You're really the only one that knows if you can do this with him or not. If you vote for staying you know you'll have to toss out what you're craving and forget about it. As I've said, we all have to do this in some way when we choose someone, we have to accept what's in front of us and stop wondering if it will change or what the next one would be like. You're wondering if he might change more, and it's possible, but I'd advocate for making the decision to stay or not based on the fact that he won't, as that would be the most fair way to do it.

We all have these crossroads that we appear at every so often, and they provoke a lot of soul searching and then growth. Whatever you choose, there was the chance here to learn about yourself. I honestly can't tell which way you are leaning from your posts or what would be best. I've said that I'd stay with him, that's me. I'd also hate being with someone and yearning, and then having that person see that they weren't fulfilling me. So do you take the money in your hand or trade it for what's behind the curtain on the off chance that it's the new car you've been dreaming of? Don't know...




LadyPact -> RE: He's Clearly Vanilla (9/16/2012 11:45:34 AM)

OP, if I were in your position, I'd talk to LaT.




Alecta -> RE: He's Clearly Vanilla (9/16/2012 3:11:01 PM)

OP, your responses read to me like subfrenzy. Calm down!

You should know from these forums alone how often female subs come in bitching about their partners being "too vanilla to be kinky" without ever having properly explained the situation to the partner. Seriously. There is a difference between being polite and having a Dominant personality. Just because a person is polite and considerate with people does NOT automatically mean s/he is not secretly, naturally, a Dom/me. Thing is, a good deal of us who're born into the Dominant personality you have described as craving put a lot of work into toning it down to be "fit for society". Until you've heard it come straight from the horse's mouth, it's really just your assumption.

The chances of finding "the perfect one" in life are close to zero, and further diminished by the part where too often we don't actually KNOW what we want and to what capacity. Don't sabotage yourself by being too sure of what you need until you are. Calm down and really consider yourself. What are needs, what are wants, what are things you know and have proof that you need, and things that you only think you need, and the things you need right now, vs the things you need 10, 20 years from now, or even on a day you just don't feel "up to it".

I've always felt it distasteful when experienced subs complain about their partners being too "new" to being a Dom/me to satisfy. You've built your relationship on something other than kink, it's unfair to now judge them and dismiss or diminish the rest of the relationship based on something that was not even discussed or evaluated when the two of you got together. Not to mention, if you're that attached to the person, if you love them so much, why can you not spare that extra patience helping them understand what you want and need and teaching them to get there?

And before you start with the TFB fear, teaching your partner what you want and prefer is not topping from the bottom. Dictating when and how things happen, especially against their wishes, is. Teaching them about it and about how it works best isn't, it's just being supportive and making helpful suggestions.

There is a booklist for introducing your partner to kink, as a regular you should know it.

Personally I find 50 Shades to be hilarious and will not take anyone who takes the description of BDSM in them as truth seriously. BUT, it has the advantage of being considered mainstream and the idea of reading from it is less shocking to a "poor vanilla" than reading from "The Story of O", for example.

Some things are all down to how you sell it to people. For example, I would explain the rules in a D/s dynamic as "operating guidelines to leading a harmonious life with so-and-so. House rules for day-to-day life and how s/he thinks." So, drawing from what you'd said you missed,

quote:

I miss being able to solve some tiny problem with a swift punishment. Knowing it’s done and over after without some needless long discussion.


"OP knows she can be an unreasonable brat sometimes, or just plain argumentative. She doesn't like it either, but she doesn't always notice nor is she always able to contain herself. She wants you to help her by pulling her up on that behaviour as it happens. Swift metaphorical kick to the ass. And if it's something that really needs to be talked about or discussed, she prefers it be done afterwards, when she's calm and reasonable."

quote:

I miss the praise for completing tasks.


"OP wants you to show your appreciation towards her in such-a-such-a-way, because sometimes she doesn't get it right away when you're being subtle. It's just like how you like to hear her say 'I love you' even though you know without her saying."

quote:

I miss being trained to be exactly what he wants. I just miss fulfilling someone that way.


"OP wants you to just come out and say what you want and like so she doesn't have to guess all the time, and help her remember the things you like cos it's sometimes hard to keep in mind. She wants to be able to do things for you exactly the way you like it done, so you've got to teach her so she doesn't have to guess. Seriously, this is much more straight forward than putting up with frittered sausages every morning because you never explained that you like them boiled."

quote:

The “surprise- you’re going to be tied to the bed post for an hour because that’s what I want- love you” thing.


"OP is kinky... she likes being surprised by being tied to the bed and ravished for hours on end or teased and left hanging for hours, more so than she likes chocolates or flowers. Congratulations."




LaTigresse -> RE: He's Clearly Vanilla (9/16/2012 6:04:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThrowAway88

I miss that Thing. I miss that clear cut definition of my role. I miss the structure. That extra level of trust and love. I miss being able to solve some tiny problem with a swift punishment. Knowing it’s done and over after without some needless long discussion. I miss the praise for completing tasks. I miss being trained to be exactly what he wants. I just miss fulfilling someone that way. I miss kneeling! That meditative subspace. That clear focus on His Needs. That creative thing that every Dom I’ve ever had possessed. The “surprise- you’re going to be tied to the bed post for an hour because that’s what I want- love you” thing. Those things and a thousand others. It’s just the silly little stuff that definitely adds up. I just want him to appreciate that part of me. That’s all really. Right there.

I guess I wondered after reading some of this, if the advice here and what I’m being chastised for, is to always always always date through kinky avenues. I’m probably not going to do that. I don’t think that makes me a bad person. There have been responses here that have made me feel like I’m conniving and mean-spirited. But after a little time away, knowing my own situation and myself, I let that go. I’m not a bad person and haven’t done anything malicious.




Okay, I've snipped this down to the two core issues that are bugging me about this whole thing.

In the second paragraph you are saying that you do not wish to date always, via kink avenue. That leads to it being pretty fucking hit and miss on whether or not someone you date will ever 'appreciate' your need for kink.

Which leads to the first paragraph. The things that you are missing are activities. Either activities derived from a clear power exchange dynamic or, kink.

Now, here is the dealio......... if you are going to piss and whine about not having the kink and power exchange dynamic activities yet you refuse to limit your dating to people that ARE absolutely for sure, only wanting that as an aspect in their relationship.......how is it you are not getting that your gamble is more than a bit deceptive? When you started dating this guy, did you flat out tell him you NEEDED the stuff you listed, to have a fulfilling relationship or were you just flying by the seat of your pants hoping he was going to transform into something he wasn't already?

You don't know me from Adam, that much is clear. But I do have a wee bit of experience to draw from here. Maybe not exactly apples and apples, but not as different as you might think.

In all honesty, if you are the fabulous woman you seem to feel you are.......I think you should take this fella out to dinner and tell him the relationship is over. That it really is, all your fault. And let him find someone that can appreciate him for EXACTLY who he is. Not someone that tells him how awesome he is, but then says how he really isn't all that awesome, out the other side of their mouth.

Facts are facts, either you accept him as he is, for who he is and quit wishing he was your perfect romance novel super dude (they don't exist), or let him find a woman for whom he is absolutely perfect........just as he is.

What you are doing right now isn't fair to him or you. Not long term. And I think you should reconsider how you screen your dating pool.




graceadieu -> RE: He's Clearly Vanilla (9/16/2012 7:53:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThrowAway88

I guess I wondered after reading some of this, if the advice here and what I’m being chastised for, is to always always always date through kinky avenues. I’m probably not going to do that. I don’t think that makes me a bad person.


It doesn't make you a bad person. But if you need to be dominated to be happy, dating vanilla people isn't going to be a very effective strategy to get that.




Winterapple -> RE: He's Clearly Vanilla (9/16/2012 8:00:04 PM)

It seems self defeating to date vanilla when you
want something other than vanilla. When you date
vanilla you should do so with the
expectation of the relationships that
develope are most likely going to be
vanilla ones.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625