farglebargle -> RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case (10/4/2012 7:22:40 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Raiikun quote:
ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk Which isn't what happened here at all......but as a curiousity I can understand your point. What happened here, is Police thought there wasn't the evidence to refute the self defense claim, he call to make him look racist. The Police Chief, since fired, who had a conflict of interest with Zimmerman and Osterman, and appears to have been negligent in his duty? See, your assertion that "there wasn't evidence" was proven false by the JUDGE'S SIGNATURE ON THE PAPERWORK SAYING THAT AS AN ISSUE OF LAW, THERE IS EVIDENCE ENOUGH TO LET A JURY DECIDE THE ISSUES OF FACT. So, keep repeating the same falsehoods. We all know they're false, why they're false, and we all have a good idea of your reasons for continuing to repeat them.
|
|
|
|