quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun

And the judge.

That has a FAR bigger impact on the case than the amount of donated money used for bond.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun

And the judge.

That has a FAR bigger impact on the case than the amount of donated money used for bond.

Hardly, nobody is looking to give the judge a number and watch him closely, or dress him in ribbons and pinafore for the square dance in the common area every saturday night. 

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
nothing here is relevant to the fact that it will be introduced in trial

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

So far you have been batting way less than a hundred. 

quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

And what proof do you have of editing jail call transcripts.

Shelley's probable cause affidavit

Read page 2, and compare to

Actual bond hearing transcript

Page 26. It's easy to see what the State edited out where Shellie offered to get the person on the phone who could give a current estimate how much money the Zimmmermans had collected.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

So it just what you think...well that explains alot. As you say "You have no proof"

quote:

I also not you did not reply to my comments on O'Mara

quote:

you avoid any hard questions that condicte your opinion, you are batting less than 100....

quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

So it just what you think...well that explains alot. As you say "You have no proof"

You realize that is proof right there? The actual transcript, then the State edited version that cut out material from what was actually said?

No proof of the State editing...just your opinion, and as they say opinion are like a**holes.....[;)]

quote:

I also not you did not reply to my comments on O'Mara

That one is simple. O'Mara's statements were before the jail calls became public knowledge when we found out George actually did try and tell O'Mara about the funds before the bond hearing.

O'Mara would still have faced being disbarred, that is his statemant.

quote:

you avoid any hard questions that condicte your opinion, you are batting less than 100....

Untrue. (It also doesn't help you're case that you don't generally ever come up with facts to contradict my stance.)

Again you avoid questions, why hasn't O'Mara simply asked for a dismissal?

Like this one....remember?
Further you keep saying there is no proof. If that were fact then O'Mara would have not requested a wavier to a speedy trail nor state the the case would not go to trial will not start until 2013 and go to 2014? O'Mara is a smart lawyer, he would by now see what you do and just have trail and get it over

As I said you always aviod questions that don't fit you views. I am still waiting on you answer other questions...like you witness you stated will prove Zimmerman, when her statement stated she never left her home and thought she heard someone walking their dog....but that okay as I said you don't answer questions that don't fit your view [:)]

quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun

And the judge.

That has a FAR bigger impact on the case than the amount of donated money used for bond.

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

George Zimmerman's DNA, not Trayvon Martin's, found on gun

Only DNA from George Zimmerman was found on the grip of the gun that was used in the fatal shooting of unarmed teenager Trayvon Martin, according to DNA test results released Wednesday.
.......

Zimmerman has acknowledged shooting Martin, but insists he acted in self-defense in the wake of a confrontation that left him injured.

The DNA findings could play a role in the trial, allowing the prosecution to argue against self-defense since it now seems that Martin never touched the weapon. The defense could counter that Zimmerman shot before Martin could get to the gun.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-zimmerman-prosecution-dna-evidence-20120919,0,120380.story

This just seems to keep going downhill.

This isnt started to renew the previous arguments. Its about the DNA evidence in the case and this part of the trial. I foresee this being a sticking point with a jury.

Anyone else glad this is dragging out a bit?

quote:

White boy still gonna walk on all charges. Florida is still in the south ain't it?

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

So if this was reverse and zimmerman was the 17 year old and Martin was an older black man? We'd have all these threads that the older black man was innocent?

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle


I see the Court just making sure that when Zimmerman is convicted of his crime, he has absolutely no grounds for appeal.

quote:


He *really* shouldn't have directed his attorney to lie to the court on his behalf. There's like an institutional hatred of that kind of shit. Shows a complete disregard for the Courts' authority.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

So if this was reverse and zimmerman was the 17 year old and Martin was an older black man? We'd have all these threads that the older black man was innocent?