Arturas -> RE: This is weird. (9/22/2012 11:19:18 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DarkSteven According to the polls, Obama's got an edge. But if you read the comments here and on the CNN/yahoo news sites, the pro-Obama folks are sounding increasingly condescending and confident, and the pro-Romney folks are sounding wilder and making statements such as boasting of the upcoming Romney landslide, and complaining about the bias of the liberal media. I've even read a couple of conservative commentators making allusions to an upcoming loss, such as Ann Coulter's statement about how, if the GOP cannot unseat Obama, they should just hang it up. Add to that the fact that the Romney campaign can't figure out how to stay on issue, and the whole campaign is beginning to give off an air of being over. Yet the numbers show that Romney is behind but within striking distance. And he's got the debates ahead of him and, if rumors are true, a plan to buy air time significantly for a last minute push. Why the heck are so many acting like it's all over? Hi Steven, I've not noticed that. I suspect most of the GOP are simply frustrated Mitt is not twenty points ahead already and that naturally goes against the grain of logic if we were talking about logic but we are not, we are talking about an emotional support for Obama that is still left over from 2008 and is very large indeed. One has a difficult time changing emotions with logic. I think elections are in reality won over by emotions, don't you? The candidate that can touch the emotions of a voter gets their vote. Clinton is a master of being your best friend and touching a nerve in his listener and it matters not if what he is saying is exactly true or not and he does it without a teleprompter but Obama cannot. If you see the few video and sound bytes, played by mainstream media, of Mitt speaking to reporters on issues of this day you will see he is focused and strong and articulate and stirs the emotion with that common sense approach Clinton and Reagan uses. Obama is more like Carter who could not speak well unless he was prompted or rehearsed. So, I am one of those who predict and hope for a landslide much like the Reagan landslide agains Carter who was about as much ahead, maybe more, in the polls (I mean, Reagan looked like toast) before the debates and he destroyed Carter in all but the first debate and went on to win by a landslide just a few weeks after being behind in the polls. Naturally this is logic and emotion talking and so it may be weird that it works out that way.
|
|
|
|