myotherself -> RE: every slave is a master...and every mistress is a slave (9/25/2012 11:02:32 PM)
|
I'm assuming (hoping!) that English isn't your first language, because that post made my eyes bleed... Now onto the post (translated into English): I believe that every slave is a master because he asked a mistress to own him. He asked to serve her because it would make him happy and, because she agreed to his request, the mistress becomes a slave because she is doing what the slave has asked. Also, the mistress is a slave to money and life. I think slave boys would find it difficult to live without a mistress, but the dominant, sadistic woman doesn't care whether she has a slave or not because she's looking at it as a fantasy. Finally, slave men need a mistress more than a mistress needs them. Therefore mistresses are still slaves because they do what the sub men request, either for money or because it's a fantasy of theirs, but in the end she's doing what the men want. OP - I think you need to do some reading and I think you need to get out there and meet some subs, slaves, Mistresses, Masters in real llife. You seem to have a very skewed view of an M/s relationship and all the high school philosophising isn't going to help you find what you want. Making a request does not put you in charge. Answering a request in the positive does not make you a slave.
|
|
|
|