|
madramblings -> RE: every slave is a master...and every mistress is a slave (9/27/2012 10:48:10 AM)
|
quote:
hello first you shouldnt cheat yourself during reading this topic
yes every slave is a master now cauze he requested from a mistress to own hime ...and she doing that...he request for serve her cauze that make him happy and she doing him request.......so the mistress is a slave doing all requests for the slave ....the another thing that mistress is a slave to money ,life.....i think slave boys couldnt live without mistress its to diffcult for him to alive without a girl dominat him ....but the dom and sadctic girl doesnt care about she has a slave or no ...cauze she doing that in fantazy way......finally slave men need the mistresses more the mistresses need him ...so that the mistresses are slaves they do requests of a slaves for money or fantazy ...but at all she doing something what man he want
Intellectual, are you? And, that's the best you can do toward language usage? Are you drunk? Did someone recently hit you in the head, repeatedly, and are you blacking out? I'm vitally worried that, if no is the answer to those two questions, you might have a tumor.
Even so, and even though you obviously just wish to be controversial, I wade into the b.s. and make reply.:
1) A Mistress is not necessarily a slave owner of any sort. I am a Mistress and I have, ever since the age of 12, been, to some degree, a Mistress because I was acting as the female head of a household: mine or someone elses. Some of that time I really was a slave and some of that time I owned slaves, including doing both at once. Mistress, however, is not a title that means slave owner. Master does! Historically speaking, if a woman owned a slave, then, when the slave was asked who was its master,, it would reply that Mistress, Dame, Her Majesty (or whatever her title was followed by her name) was its master. Or, whatever the equivalent was, at the time in history, and in the place where the question was being asked.
2) A female slave owner does not necessarily own male slaves.
3) Just because a slave begs to be owned and you acquiesce does not mean that the slave is in charge. Do you feel that you are in charge of the city, every time you call because there is a pothole in the road and, eventually, someone comes around to fix it? Are you suddenly the Mayor? Pfft .. The fact that the slave is begging should tell you something about the situation, because ..
4) As the one thing you got right says, assuming I understood that gibbering correctly, she doesn't need the slave. No one NEEDS slaves, even when they joke and say they do. Slaves are fun! I don't NEED to own anyone, because I can get on with my life just fine without them. I prefer to own slaves; but, slaves NEED to be owned. It is in their make-up. So, when they beg to be owned and I do allow them the privilege, or I simply walk by them one day and spot them for what they are and order them to come along, it is not me needing them, but, them needing me and me being kind enough to allow them admission into my life, as long as they please me.
5) Every slave is not owned by a Mistress.
6) Most slaves I owned were purchased or given to me as gifts. They had no choice in the matter and they were certainly not telling me to own them; though, many of them did beg me to let them stay rather than to go elsewhere, at some point or another.
7) If you weren't completely full of twaddle, and unable to write coherent sentences, and you said what you really seem to want to have said - that most Mistresses are fake arsed scamming whores who are not really in charge because they are just doing what the alleged slave males want in order to get their money, I would have agreed with you. You did, however, utterly fail to make that point, so you stand corrected.
Whereas I stand disgusted by your lack of command of the English language; and idly wondering, for my own self-amusement, how hard it would be to find you, in order to beat your arse red, soap up your mouth, spank your fumble-fingers with a ruler, and make you rewrite the whole thing, over and over again, until it finally made sense. Ooh, that would be fun. I wonder, though, if that isn't what you want?
No wait, I don't care! Why? Because:
8) Doing what she wants, even though the slave also wants it done, does not make the Mistress less in command. It is doing what she does not want, and has no compelling other reason to do, just to please the slave, that is where she loses her grip.
|
|
|
|
