DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Aswad quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri And, Norway gets nothing out of this? Good karma. I'm not sure being greedy about that is a vice. Let's be clear: this is a pension fund, so future generations will indeed get something out of it, though probably not the current generation of politicians. Ethical conduct has primacy. Preserving a good future is secondary. Earning money is third, and a consequence of preserving a good future. Obviously, we turn a profit. We just don't take that profit out of the system, so to speak. But we'll take a loss over poor ethics, and have done so in the past. That is just good business, IMO. Very commendable that there is a commitment to strong ethics. Wish there was more of it here. quote:
With a bit of creative twisting, one can always ascribe selfish motives, and usually greedy ones, but that mostly comes down to perspective. When discussing real motivators, however, intent matters. Greed isn't in evidence here in any meaningful sense. Thank you for answering the question that MN failed to answer. ETA: Comparing the paycheck of the POTUS to that of our PM, we see that the POTUS earns about 20 times the typical net annual household income there, while our PM earns about 1.5 times the typical net annual household income here. The PM sets his own paycheck, for all intents and purposes. If he wanted more, he would have more. If this is greed, he's not very good at it. quote:
Why are you even investing? There's a future. We would like to keep it that way. And preferrably be in it. quote:
Does your global seed vault (which is a very cool thing) contain non-GMO seed, and/or "heriloom" seed? Of course. Part of the reason why Monsanto bothered to pay part of it is precisely that this see vault means we can reseed the world if one of their experiments go crazy and wipe out unmodified crops. A snapshot of the current gene pool, as nature handed it to us, before we start to fuck it up. Even Monsanto can see the logic in that, or at least the massive lawsuit they would face in case of such an event. Of course, such a lawsuit wouldn't resolve before global food supply was down to supporting a few million people, so I figure they might also see that whole "surviving our own crap" angle to it. For our sake, it mostly comes down to having the territory, the technology and the resources. On all accounts: check. Svalbard has the benefit of being inherently too cold for the refrigeration to critically fail, being really inaccessible to anyone with an interest in putting a dent in the place, and us already having freed up a damn solid facility about the time the idea popped up. I would've preferred to have some sort of airship backup to deal with meteor strikes, too, but reseeding might not even be possible if that happens (and there would be no humans around to initiate the process, anyway). Still, as you say, a very cool thing. IWYW, — Aswad. The main reason i asked about non-GMO and heirloom seeds was because of Monsanto's being part of it. Glad those are unfounded concerns. I want to thank you, again, Aswad. Regardless of our political belief differences, you always come off as respectful. That rates very high with me.
_____________________________
What I support: - A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
- Personal Responsibility
- Help for the truly needy
- Limited Government
- Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
|