LookieNoNookie -> RE: 7.8% and I have a bridge to sell too (10/8/2012 4:54:05 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote:
ORIGINAL: subspaceseven he is the corrupt ex CEO of GE, he has also walked back this statement, I guess if you are proud of people who steal from shareholders and manipulate company records then you would follow him and believe what ever he says, to the rest of us, he is just another white collar crook, who stuck the shareholders with the fines It's an ironic accusation coming from Welch, who knows a thing or two about employment. After all, he achieved success at GE by slashing more than 100,000 jobs at the company in the 1980s to boost profits. Then the irony gets even thicker when one considers that Welch is now widely remembered as Corporate America's most skillful manipulator of quarterly earnings results and manager of expectations on Wall Street -- a skill that is particularly handy for CEOs overly focused on their stock price. It's a good thing they got rid of him and have Jeffrey Immelt as CEO now. Nothing represents the icon of economics like the US "Job's Czar" who, btw, outsourced a shitload of jobs and, under his tenure, GE has gotten tax refunds while making profits overseas. Or, is he a paraiah, too? The Wiki entry on Jack Welch, isn't quite as damning as your description. Yeah, I know it's Wikipedia, but I've provided more links than you did in your character assault. Of the 112k jobs that were slashed, 37k were in businesses that were sold. That is, they left GE and went to a different company. Is it a bad thing to cut employees that aren't needed? According to Wiki, Welch would fire the bottom 10% of his managers at the end of each year. He would also reward the top 20% with stock an options. And, then, he even went the way of the Dark Side and expanded that program to almost a third of all employees. Under his oversight, GE went from $26B in revenues to $130B, and the value of the company went from $14B to $410B. I bet anyone who had stock in GE was completely pissed at him for that shit, huh? Facts confuse (so many) people. The guy took over a company in 1981 and when he left in 1999 (18 years) he grew the company from basically 27 billion to 130 billion sales. Not a bad record by any measure. In that same period the value of the company he chaired went from 14 billion to slightly more than 400 billion. He basically made "Sigma 6" a standard operating procedure for U.S. and global corporations wherein which, executives AND staff of all levels (right down to the janitor) were graded...on their value to the company. Ya didn't produce the goods...out you go. Same as in my firms. It's a beautiful thing...get in the game and realize why we're here....to support our clients....or get the fuck out. Pick one. Don't matter to me if you don't want to commit to our goals. I'm not here for your dream....I'm here for ours...the collective goal, all those people all around you that you're supposed to give a shit about. Don't? See ya. He flushed the ones that weren't producing and gave raises to the ones that were. He dumped divisions that weren't producing, he dumped people that weren't producing and he dumped products that weren't producing. Sounds like a venerable business person to me. Man or woman...that's the kind of company I'd like to work for. They reward success....not failure.
|
|
|
|