fucktoyprincess
Posts: 2337
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MariaB One of the reasons I have always admired Lance Armstrong is, he was a big symbol of hope for all those suffering similar cancers to him. Lets not forget the huge amounts of money this guy has raised for charity. The number of people, me included, who have been inspired by this guys zest for life. His accomplishments were huge and the guy showed extraordinary courage, determination, persistence, and absolute discipline when it came to training and competing. I have followed the 'tour'. I followed it again this year and its unbelievably tough. I live on the same mountains these guys cycle up. I regularly have to drive 8 mile climbs in second gear and that's in a car for christ sake. Lance may well of doped but he wasn't alone. Every guy that stood on that podium was under some 'code of silence' It was a fairly mutual supportive group but when one talked they were all stuffed. The saddest thing isn't that he did this, which I'm sure he did, but the continual witch hunt to bring him to ground and dig him out. Lets be assured that those who went on this witch hunt won't have achieved anything like as much as he has. Le plus dur, c'est pas d'arriver au sommet, c'est d'y etre. I have known many people who have suffered from cancer. Some are in remission. Some are still battling. And some are dead. The youngest person I know battling cancer was 5 when diagnosed (and is now 10). Another of the youngest was in her 20s when she was diagnosed and died. The oldest in their 80s. None of them won any kind of athletic competition. None of them was "famous". None of them made millions of dollars from corporate sponsorships. But they inspire me more each day of my life more than words can say, and certainly much more than some cheating athlete who thought he was above the rules. You know, the more I think about this, f*** Lance Armstrong. I just attended another funeral this past weekend. Millions of people die from cancer who are much better people. I really don't care about someone who made a ton of money by cheating. It makes him no better than those guys on Wall St. that everyone complains about. Wall Streeters donate a lot of money to charity, too. So what? So now doing things for charity means we just overlook the bad things that people did? Personally, I have many other people who are better poster people for cancer. No, none of them is famous, but when I think about the true impact cancer has had on the people who I know who have battled it, and the strength of their souls in the face of this awful disease, they all make Lance Armstrong look like a complete and utter jerk. He made a lot of money by cheating. Maybe the charity work was to assuage his guilt. For the record, Burns Entertainment & Sports Marketing, which tracks endorsement income for U.S. celebrities, estimates that Armstrong made $15 million to $18 million from endorsements in 2011 alone, with almost 2/3 of that coming from Nike. That was just for 2011. That actually makes some of the Wall Streeters look poor. Also, for those who would like to support cancer causes, there are 1000s of charities out there dedicated to this disease that have nothing to do with Lance Armstrong. If you support the cause then donate and make a difference. Lance Armstrong is irrelevant.
< Message edited by fucktoyprincess -- 10/22/2012 5:01:30 PM >
_____________________________
~ ftp
|