RE: Iran VS Israel (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


FMRFGOPGAL -> RE: Iran VS Israel (10/19/2012 12:11:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ermood

Als ik niet uit Nederland zou komen waarom zou ik de taal dan kennen?
Ga naar de mac ofzo... jezelf nog dikker vreten;)

Dumb fool.


Knock off the personal attacks. It's pathetic that you can't hide the hated ebnough to actually debate. But you basically engage exclusively in specious hatespeek and providing inadequate documentation of your claims. And when someone challenges, you attack instead of supporting anything you say.
  Grow up so you have some longevity here.




FMRFGOPGAL -> RE: Iran VS Israel (10/19/2012 12:20:17 PM)

And by the way, I am not Dutch, but I recognized that you are claiming you're dutch because you can TYPE it. Dat is totaal onzin.




YN -> RE: Iran VS Israel (10/19/2012 12:34:04 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

This might be of interest to those who regard this as a purely military question:

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/2012/10/us-navy-allies-find-less-than-half-the-sea-mines-planted-in-key-exercise.html


That is a small thing compared to the mischief that would occur in this fog of war.

Remember the United States managed to destroy an airliner by accident.

What mischief will gremlins get into when every military unit and vessel of every nation in a 2000 km radius is on high alert and with their fingers on the fire button?

An Israeli F-16 appears as the same F-16 which many nations there are armed with for instance. Most countries at war work on the understandable assumption that any warship or plane not belonging to them or known to be an ally must belong to their enemy.




Anaxagoras -> RE: Iran VS Israel (10/19/2012 12:39:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
quote:

Once again Vincent you're being very selective. Few on here (including myself) think the Iraq War was anything other than a terrible mistake but the US (and others) had good reason to reject the 12,000 page document as nothing other than recycled bullshit

I thank you for the compliment, Anax. Selective and discerning, indeed. Both higher order strategies of creative thinking. Good of you to notice. [:D]

I of course meant selective with the truth but if you misunderstood and thought I was referring to cognitive categorisation then I suggest you should revisit your Nietzsche! [8|]

quote:


As to Mr Blix, it is true he admitted his work was not done. Blix found no stockpiles of WMD, said Iraq was being "proactive" if not always "immediate" in complying with UN Security Council 1441. "He concluded that it would take “but months” to resolve the key remaining disarmament tasks." GW Bush, without opening the 12,000 page Declaration I'm guessing, threw a hissy in front of the Security Council and demanded a new resolution to apply force. The SC told Bushie to go pound salt.

Wow I actually thought you would come back with the strawman response above! You stated that Iraq was co-operating with the UN and cited a 12,000 page declaration. My point is the document was nonsense, as was widely acknowledged at the time. It was little more than a time gaining measure and the US rightly rejected it as did other parties in the UN (including Blix). Your assertion that Iraq was co-operating fully with UN 1441 is disputed even by your quote above states, and the dubious declaration lends weight to that claim.

quote:


A terrible mistake, you call it, Anax? Fuck no! It was more than an oops! How fucking insensitive we have become to war-horror to call it a mistake. It was an outrageous criminal act ot terror upon an innocent people and in the name of innocent people.

Unwilling to give Blixie just a few more months George gathered a bunch of other foolish national leaders and went off to fight his 'splendid little war' ala TRoosevelt, resulting in the deaths of untold numbers of Iraqi civilians and Coalition troops. Who knows how many humans escaped death but were left maimed or displaced from their homes? Shock n Awe! Shock n Awe! We'll be home by Christmas. Oh, it was a fine moment for AmeriEngland.[8|] Don't get me started.[:-]

I opposed the war at the time and also the other interventionist actions that Clinton engaged in during the 90's but the reality with Iraq does not seem to be as clear-cut or malign as you suggest. I agree Blix should have been given more time but ultimately Iraq had not complied with UN 1441 even in spirit. Blix also acknowledged that Iraq hadn't genuinely committed to disarm http://edition.cnn.com/2003/US/01/27/sprj.irq.blix.report/index.html and asserted that there was a good deal of chemical material that remained unaccounted.




ermood -> RE: Iran VS Israel (10/19/2012 1:43:20 PM)

uhmm... your last post...




ermood -> RE: Iran VS Israel (10/19/2012 1:46:33 PM)

I could, but why would i posts my sources here? you can find them yourselfs if you want to;)

And why wouldn't i "attack people" here, while they can't post anything that could make any sence...




ermood -> RE: Iran VS Israel (10/19/2012 1:50:20 PM)

No i can see that you're not dutch;) it still is: dat is totale onzin instead of dat is totaal onzin.... i don't fall for that googletranslate crap;)

Well let me "prove" it on a other way... typing Limburgs.... (Limburg is a province in The Netherlands wich has its own language, Limburg is also a region in Belgium but they write it on an other way then we do)

Dus gank mer snel ein leave zeuke veur detse van dea onzin geis oetkroame;)


Go try to find that on googletranslate;)




FMRFGOPGAL -> RE: Iran VS Israel (10/19/2012 1:55:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ermood

I could, but why would i posts my sources here? you can find them yourselfs if you want to;)

And why wouldn't i "attack people" here, while they can't post anything that could make any sence...


Because it's how things are done here. But if you'd rather be disliked and have a short lifespan
The other rather valid reason is IT FALLS UPON YOU TO BACK UP YOUR CLAIMS. Nobody else has the responsibility to back up YOUR claims. Worried your assertions are just what people are calling them?




ermood -> RE: Iran VS Israel (10/19/2012 1:59:02 PM)

Why would i wan't to prove my facts?

If someone doesn't believe them then its his job to prove otherwhise... but instead of doing that they make usless posts...




FMRFGOPGAL -> RE: Iran VS Israel (10/19/2012 1:59:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ermood
And why wouldn't i "attack people" here, while they can't post anything that could make any sence...


No reason at all if your intent is to appear ignorant and completely contradict your already specious claims about the US.
  Keep on attacking then and enjoy the collarchat lifespan of  a housefly.
  I for one, won't miss you for a second. And I sorely doubt I'll get verification on this, but I'll bet I'm not alone.




crazyml -> RE: Iran VS Israel (10/19/2012 2:01:20 PM)

Without fact to back up your claims, your posts are useless too.




FMRFGOPGAL -> RE: Iran VS Israel (10/19/2012 2:02:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ermood

No i can see that you're not dutch;) it still is: dat is totale onzin instead of dat is totaal onzin.... i don't fall for that googletranslate crap;)

Well let me "prove" it on a other way... typing Limburgs.... (Limburg is a province in The Netherlands wich has its own language, Limburg is also a region in Belgium but they write it on an other way then we do)

Dus gank mer snel ein leave zeuke veur detse van dea onzin geis oetkroame;)


Go try to find that on googletranslate;)


So you admit you use google translate. I am fine with that. It's as phony as any of your claims.




ermood -> RE: Iran VS Israel (10/19/2012 2:03:20 PM)

Aha so it would be not for the claims that i should "attack people" but its the fact that i am critic about the US;) nice way to spread propaganda isn't it.

Well that's probably becouse there aren't much proper educated people here who have any idea of geopolitics...




ermood -> RE: Iran VS Israel (10/19/2012 2:06:25 PM)

Not at all... becouse my posts make sence, and they aren't based on pure propaganda and they have multiple sources so they can be easely found;)




ermood -> RE: Iran VS Israel (10/19/2012 2:10:29 PM)

Yes I use googletranslate to translate words when i'm not sure how to write that, but we all know that it can't translate proper phrases;)

And you can't blame me on the facts that i don't know every english word there is becouse its my 4th language;)
Peole that are proper educated do know more than four languages you know... something you probably can't talk about...




crazyml -> RE: Iran VS Israel (10/19/2012 2:12:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ermood

Not at all... becouse my posts make sence, and they aren't based on pure propaganda and they have multiple sources so they can be easely found;)


They may make sense to you, but alas...

If you're not willing to post some evidence, don't be too surprised if people presume you're just spouting pure propaganda yourself.




ermood -> RE: Iran VS Israel (10/19/2012 2:17:02 PM)

Tell me... who is 24/7 listening to propaganda? a lot of people yes... but i'm from The Netherlands, a country where people laugh at propaganda;)


I assume that people here are mostly from the US... so who would rather trying to spread out propaganda? someone that is listening to it 24/7 or someone that isn't...

Besides that, like i said, i do not use one source... i use mulitple sources to confirm it... wich means that i use sources from all over the world... EU sources, US sources, Russian sources ect.





FMRFGOPGAL -> RE: Iran VS Israel (10/19/2012 2:18:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ermood

Yes I use googletranslate to translate words when i'm not sure how to write that, but we all know that it can't translate proper phrases;)

And you can't blame me on the facts that i don't know every english word there is becouse its my 4th language;)
Peole that are proper educated do know more than four languages you know... something you probably can't talk about...


I am an analysis coordinator in a college with a rather esteemed reputation in the field of political science. this forum is supported in ENGLISH, I support all but the most self-evident claims with links to resources to back up my claims. Your struggle with the native language is of no consequence to me. Debate properly or get off the pot.
This isn't some remedial politics forum by virtue of your having logged in.




ermood -> RE: Iran VS Israel (10/19/2012 2:32:38 PM)

quote:

this forum is supported in ENGLISH


This is already one of the things why i don't show my sources... simply becouse a lot of them aren't in English;)
Most of them are in Russian, German, Dutch, Arabic and Chinese... the rest are in Englis wich aren't that much.

So why would i post my sources when i know you can't understand anything of it;)

With other words... the fact that you only speak English ( wich isn't my native language, so it isn't the native language either) is a problem on this thread;)




FMRFGOPGAL -> RE: Iran VS Israel (10/19/2012 2:42:45 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ermood

quote:

this forum is supported in ENGLISH


This is already one of the things why i don't show my sources... simply becouse a lot of them aren't in English;)
Most of them are in Russian, German, Dutch, Arabic and Chinese... the rest are in Englis wich aren't that much.

So why would i post my sources when i know you can't understand anything of it;)

With other words... the fact that you only speak English ( wich isn't my native language, so it isn't the native language either) is a problem on this thread;)


The forum's in Enlish little man... it's just the way things are. I am sure if you look hard enough you can find a nice Dutch thread where you can bash Americans don't have to be in command of any facts. Or back them up for that matter.




Page: <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125