crazyml
Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Abraxas So, I have been thinking about it a lot, and while I myself am against it, subjectively, in an objective perspective, I want to know how and why Financial Domination came about, when it started, how it is different from prostitution, if it is legally classified as such, and why some people are ok with it and others are not. Ignoring my opinion on the matter, I am curious to get inside the head of someone who practices this. Please, I want to learn. So you've been thinking about this a lot eh? Well given that I barely spend a second pondering these questions, you're probably far better positioned than I am to provide an answer. Would you please consider having a pop at the questions you've posed? For me... Ok... do you mean "Pro-Domming" or "Financial-Domming" - the two are different. One relates to the provision of Domming services in exchange for a fee, the other relates to a specific kink in which the sub gives up some or all control over his/her finances. Assuming you meant Pro-Domming here's my take... how and why it came about.... Well, Probably way back when, this stoneage man (let's call him Ugg) found that being spanked gave him a hard-on. For whatever the reason (shyness, not wanting everyone to know, or perhaps he was just butt ugly) he couldn't get a gal to spank him, but he heard that there was this woman in the next village who, in exchange for a couple of tiger pelts would happily thrash his stone-age behind. And hey-presto! That's how it all started.... Now, I'm not being snarky at all... I believe that shit I've just written. I think it's been around for fucking ever in one form or another. How is it different from prostitution? Well, bear in mind that there are more than a few out and out prostitutes who bill themselves as pro-dommes, or who will add a bit of domination to the sexual services that they provide. But they're not pro-dommes, they're prostitutes that do a little domming on the side. A pro-domme is selling domination, not sex. Is it legally classified as such? It depends on the activities that are involved. Making a man wear panties isn't likely to be classified as prostitution, making him cum in those panties may very well. I think there'll be plenty of cases where a court could be persuaded that the services provided by a specific pro-domme amounted to prostitution. Why are some people ok with it and some not? Some believe that it's immoral. Some believe that it is essentially the same as prostitution. Some hate it because they're drawn to it and can't help themselves, others dislike it because they've discovered that (for whatever reason) it's the only way they can get a woman to dominate them. Personally... I've no objection to it at all in principle. It's not for me. Firstly I'm dominant, but while I've no objection to pro-subs, that's not my cuppa tea either. [ED for typo and to add..] Btw... I've no in principle objection to either prostitution or pro-domming - provided that in both cases there is no coercion (either physical, emotional or situational) involved.
< Message edited by crazyml -- 10/16/2012 5:28:49 AM >
_____________________________
Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.
|