PeonForHer
Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: crazyml quote:
ORIGINAL: PeonForHer Hmmm. Well, it seems my apologies are in order: serves me right for going on second hand information. You are right that Mourdock has expressed his regret (though, from your citation, for *the impression* others have received from what he said rather than for what he actually said). Well he can't actually apologise for something he didn't say, can he now? Unless you also think that this sentence - "And I came to realise life is a gift from god, and I think, even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, it is something God intended to happen." contains a logical implication that both the life and the rape are "Something that God intended to happen" - And TBH, I know you're literate, so I cannot believe you would. Crazy, my overall conclusion regarding what Mourdock said is that, at best, he was skating on very thin ice with those words because they smack of a lack of consideration of the 'rape' part of it as against the 'birth' part of it. What we basically have here is a silly arse who's made the terrible error of hinting at some kind of logic for his prejudice. He should have just talked about God 'speaking to me', or at least said that 'my view is beyond mere reason, it comes from my Heart' - that's the usual sort of bollocks that keeps his revolting supporters happy. But, instead, he put rape and the sanctity of life in the same sentence as God, all with a veneer of reason, and thereby begged the obvious question of 'if God didn't intend the rape to happen, then how and why *did* it happen?' Was it in fact Satan working through the rapist's actions? But that would never do, would it - because then people might be justified in saying, 'Well, surely God would at least understand, and quite possibly even condone, my desire to prevent Satan's work from coming to fruition in the shape of a child borne of the seed of a man possessed by the devil?' (Or similar. Put all that in oldie worldie English to make it sound more authoritative.) If Satan wasn't behind the rapist's actions, then God must have behind them. That's true, no? It's always one or the other, for Mourdock's species of cretin-level Christian religionist?
_____________________________
http://www.domme-chronicles.com
|