RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


PeonForHer -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/5/2012 5:28:02 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

To boot, science itself is based on a number of beliefs, some of them untestable, the rest merely unproven. For instance, the belief in the existence of an objective reality.
— Aswad.



So I don't have to believe in the existence of your statement - or even you, yourself, Aswad? Maybe there is a God after all! [:)]




thompsonx -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/5/2012 6:37:13 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Descartes is philosophy not science in any case.


Cartesian plane, vector notation anyone?




Moonhead -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/5/2012 7:11:22 AM)

The quotation cited has fuck all to do with Descartes work as a mathematician, you'll find.




Aswad -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/5/2012 9:56:07 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

"I think therefor I am" seems to validate the concept of objective reality.


Cyclic reasoning is not validation, and in the first case he is making several assumptions, such as "I think".

IWYW,
— Aswad.




Aswad -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/5/2012 10:09:23 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

So I don't have to believe in the existence of your statement - or even you, yourself, Aswad? Maybe there is a God after all! [:)]


What proof do you have of my existence, even if we ignore the matter of the basic beliefs of science?

Disregarding the abstract questions, you still don't know me offline; I could be a sock for all you know. Wouldn't be the first time someone got tricked by a sock on here. I mean, sure, it would take an inordinate amount of time and effort to consistently present my august person (LOL), but it could be bogus. There's nothing to say you need to accept my existence.

For that matter, returning to the abstract, what if some ebil femdom has you trapped in a VR sim as a mindfuck?

Maybe when you "die" (log out), it's just waking up to collar and a WEG. [;)]

IWYW,
— Aswad.




PeonForHer -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/5/2012 10:23:04 AM)

"In science, Descartes discarded tradition and to an extent supported the same method as Francis Bacon, but with emphasis on rationalization and logic rather than upon experiences. In physical theory his doctrines were formulated as a compromise between his devotion to Roman Catholicism and his commitment to the scientific method, which met opposition in the church officials of the day. Mathematics was his greatest interest; building upon the work of others, he originated the Cartesian coordinates and Cartesian curves; he is often said to be the founder of analytical geometry. To algebra he contributed the treatment of negative roots and the convention of exponent notation. He made numerous advances in optics, such as his study of the reflection and refraction of light. He wrote a text on physiology, and he also worked in psychology; he contended that emotion was finally physiological at base and argued that the control of the physical expression of emotion would control the emotions themselves. His chief work on psychology is in his Traité des passions de l'âme (1649)."

http://www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/people/descartes-rene-major-contributions-to-science.html

I don't know, Moonie, some of that looks as though it might crop up in science lessons. We didn't cover analytical geometry or optics in my philosophy classes, anyway.





PeonForHer -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/5/2012 10:25:39 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad
There's nothing to say you need to accept my existence.



Did someone speak? I could have sworn that I heard a voice carried in on the cold North Wind, together with a faint rustling of a beard. [;)]




PeonForHer -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/5/2012 10:33:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

Scientifically grounded atheism is a minimalist belief system, with most forms of atheism having varying degrees of additional beliefs piled on top of some of these basics.


Funny, I've always thought something similar about theism: there's an intuition of some kind of 'higher force' . . . but there's nearly always some vast edifice or another built on top of that intuition. 'More is always better' for many on all sides, apparently.





Moonhead -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/5/2012 10:43:24 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

"In science, Descartes discarded tradition and to an extent supported the same method as Francis Bacon, but with emphasis on rationalization and logic rather than upon experiences. In physical theory his doctrines were formulated as a compromise between his devotion to Roman Catholicism and his commitment to the scientific method, which met opposition in the church officials of the day. Mathematics was his greatest interest; building upon the work of others, he originated the Cartesian coordinates and Cartesian curves; he is often said to be the founder of analytical geometry. To algebra he contributed the treatment of negative roots and the convention of exponent notation. He made numerous advances in optics, such as his study of the reflection and refraction of light. He wrote a text on physiology, and he also worked in psychology; he contended that emotion was finally physiological at base and argued that the control of the physical expression of emotion would control the emotions themselves. His chief work on psychology is in his Traité des passions de l'âme (1649)."

http://www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/people/descartes-rene-major-contributions-to-science.html

I don't know, Moonie, some of that looks as though it might crop up in science lessons. We didn't cover analytical geometry or optics in my philosophy classes, anyway.



Most of Descarte's mathematics is relevant to modern geometry.
"Cogito ergo sum", on the other hand was proposed in his Principles Of Philosophy, which is not a text on mathematics. (It isn't even very reasoned philosophy, at least in that case...)




PeonForHer -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/5/2012 10:55:14 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

"In science, Descartes discarded tradition and to an extent supported the same method as Francis Bacon, but with emphasis on rationalization and logic rather than upon experiences. In physical theory his doctrines were formulated as a compromise between his devotion to Roman Catholicism and his commitment to the scientific method, which met opposition in the church officials of the day. Mathematics was his greatest interest; building upon the work of others, he originated the Cartesian coordinates and Cartesian curves; he is often said to be the founder of analytical geometry. To algebra he contributed the treatment of negative roots and the convention of exponent notation. He made numerous advances in optics, such as his study of the reflection and refraction of light. He wrote a text on physiology, and he also worked in psychology; he contended that emotion was finally physiological at base and argued that the control of the physical expression of emotion would control the emotions themselves. His chief work on psychology is in his Traité des passions de l'âme (1649)."

http://www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/people/descartes-rene-major-contributions-to-science.html

I don't know, Moonie, some of that looks as though it might crop up in science lessons. We didn't cover analytical geometry or optics in my philosophy classes, anyway.



Most of Descarte's mathematics is relevant to modern geometry.
"Cogito ergo sum", on the other hand was proposed in his Principles Of Philosophy, which is not a text on mathematics. (It isn't even very reasoned philosophy, at least in that case...)


I know. But you did say "Descartes is philosophy not science in any case" therefore I'm constrained to observe that you were talking bollocks on that occasion, Moonie.




Aswad -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/5/2012 11:48:30 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


Did someone speak? I could have sworn that I heard a voice carried in on the cold North Wind, together with a faint rustling of a beard. [;)]


The North Wind whistles quite pleasantly at times:

A Succubus in Rapture (link)

IWYW,
— Aswad.




Aswad -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/5/2012 11:50:35 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Funny, I've always thought something similar about theism: there's an intuition of some kind of 'higher force' . . . but there's nearly always some vast edifice or another built on top of that intuition. 'More is always better' for many on all sides, apparently.


See, here, we're in perfect agreement.

We must be humble enough to recognize that we don't know enough to build a huge construct on top of what little we think we know.

Humility isn't always the strong side of a priesthood, whether secular or religious.

IWYW,
— Aswad.




GotSteel -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/5/2012 1:42:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
Atheists do have beliefs... but theirs are founded in science. Without a scientific reason, they do not have any belief/faith.


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
Yep.. and? So your beliefs arent founded in Science? Are you really wanting to argue that?

Come on!


*Face Palm*

You might as well say, Theists do have beliefs... but theirs are founded in Jesus Christ. Without a Jesus quote, they do not have any belief/faith.

It's a terrible analogy, Christ and science aren't a match. Belief meaning two completely different things, but hopeful you get my point.

Atheist doesn't tell you anything about our worldview. All it does is tell you what we're not, i.e. not theist.




tazzygirl -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/5/2012 1:45:21 PM)

And yet there are people who will say "When I pray, my prayers are answered" as proof of their belief.

When an atheist claims "When I turn on the light switch, I know the lights will come on through repetitive times it turning on before"

There is no difference.




GotSteel -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/5/2012 1:50:32 PM)

What you meant was correct, he's quibbling with the wording. So you're both right......moving on.




PeonForHer -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/5/2012 2:18:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


Did someone speak? I could have sworn that I heard a voice carried in on the cold North Wind, together with a faint rustling of a beard. [;)]


The North Wind whistles quite pleasantly at times:

A Succubus in Rapture (link)

IWYW,
— Aswad.



As dark as Norway in winter, but pretty damned good anyway. Thanks!




GotSteel -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/5/2012 3:35:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

And yet there are people who will say "When I pray, my prayers are answered" as proof of their belief.

When an atheist claims "When I turn on the light switch, I know the lights will come on through repetitive times it turning on before"

There is no difference.


Really, no difference?

One of those claims is labelled supernatural the other natural, somehow I don't think we as a civilization have done that to acknowledge that there's no difference.




dcnovice -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/5/2012 3:44:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

And yet there are people who will say "When I pray, my prayers are answered" as proof of their belief.

When an atheist claims "When I turn on the light switch, I know the lights will come on through repetitive times it turning on before"

There is no difference.


Even as someone who prays (and sometimes wonders why, but that's another story), I'm having trouble getting my head around this comparison.

Two reasons:

(a) In prayer, at least as I (mis)understand it, God is an independent actor who may grant the request or not. The electrical system is not. Assuming everything's wired correctly, it will provide light without any decision-making of its own.

(b) I don't know anyone whose prayers are answered with the regularity of flicking on a light switch.




tazzygirl -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/5/2012 4:04:27 PM)

quote:

(a) In prayer, at least as I (mis)understand it, God is an independent actor who may grant the request or not. The electrical system is not. Assuming everything's wired correctly, it will provide light without any decision-making of its own.


Assumptions are a part of science, no?

quote:

(b) I don't know anyone whose prayers are answered with the regularity of flicking on a light switch.


I do.... but you have to realize they dont pray for every little thing they want.




PeonForHer -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/5/2012 4:09:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice
I don't know anyone whose prayers are answered with the regularity of flicking on a light switch.


I've known a few, but they've usually ended up assassinated.




Page: <<   < prev  22 23 [24] 25 26   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875