RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


blnymph -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/7/2012 4:03:07 PM)

"Christians" of almost every denomination believe(d) for centuries that they d have a god-given right to force their beliefs on others by missionaries. Usually this was accompanied by violence - physical, social, psychological ...
And now some complain that those customs have become VERY unpopular in many regions of the globe ... and any attempt to do that again and again considered extremely offensive

I predict any hostile reactions of whatever kind would stop immediately the moment those "Christains" would keep their belief where it belongs - to themselves. And this would start at stopping "I ll pray for you" - no thanks but above all NO - maybe well intended but offensive nonetheless




tweakabelle -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/7/2012 4:09:19 PM)

quote:

Come to think of it, I recall being quite surprised when I first visited these forums even to see a forum headed 'Politics and Religion'. I'd never seen them put together in such a way before.


Yup. I did a double take when I saw 'Politics & Religion' strung together too. It wouldn't occur to me to put those two things together. In Australia, the role of religion in public life is far more muted than in the US. As a rule of thumb, Religion enters the political realm only when discussing a specific issue (eg abortion) or an individual politician who might choose to their religious beliefs on their sleeve. Fortunately, we don't have many of them.

Our current PM happens to be an atheist. On the rare occasions that her atheism is mentioned publicly, it is usually as an incidental factor to her beliefs and behaviour as opposed to a motivating factor. Which is as it should be. Her personal views might appear confusing to some believers eg. she is pro-choice but opposes marriage equality. Which underlines why it is so inaccurate to assert "all atheists believe X, Y, or Z" when all atheists share is a refusal to buy into what are seen as imaginary metaphysical friends.




PeonForHer -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/7/2012 4:13:28 PM)

Like it or not, this is very much an American-based website (culturally, if not geographically). One day, I might be able to write the word 'snigger' in a cmail, but I'm not holding my breath. ;-)




Rule -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/7/2012 4:20:56 PM)

I am a proponent of (religious) wars. Wars are good for populations - and I am the Hindmost.




GotSteel -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/7/2012 7:15:47 PM)

Quite frankly I'm worried about rapes being judged not to be legitimate for Jesus.

I'm not worried about somebody walking into a clearly labelled thread and getting his feelings hurt. If participating in these discussions hurts your feelings there's a really easy solution, don't.





kdsub -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/7/2012 7:32:54 PM)

But you seem to assume all people of faith agree with the Akins of this world... What would be better is to judge the man as a nut case and yes any person of religion that agrees with him... Not all and not even close to the majority of Christians let alone other religions agree with him... But you seem to have no problem lumping us all together.

And this is not the only thread this behavior manifests. Anytime someone tries to defend their faith, even when not controversial…such as discussions on God’s existence…The wise cracks about unicorns and fairies come out.

Butch




Rule -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/7/2012 7:46:30 PM)

Hey GotSteel, do not let them get you down man!

You are being loved. If not by the Divine, then most assuredly by all Christians alife (a few excepted, who did not get the message), and by assorted people of other denominations.

[sm=cute.gif]




Kirata -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/8/2012 2:39:53 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

There are a number of us who take the position that we don't know and we don't think you know either so when you start making wild assertions we call bullshit and point out that your position is unjustified.

Actually, that kind of behavior reflects a position that because you don't know, nobody does. And when you start making wild assertions like that, it shouldn't surprise you that people call bullshit and point out that your position is unjustified.

K.




Aswad -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/8/2012 4:30:14 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

If you're honest, you'll show me statistics to back up your assertion as to the minority/majority of these positions or apologize for handing us that turd.


I apologize for not qualifying it as my (strong) impression, as it's quite possible we're dealing with a vocal minority, rather than an actual majority, and it's possible there is a sample bias since we're not living in the same place. And, to clarify, honest was in reference to there being a substantial difference between groups, not their relative sizes; no insult intended.

quote:

Frankly I have no idea which of those positions is more dominant among atheists, I've seen no numbers on the subject and would really love to.


If you should run into those numbers, please let me know, as well.

quote:

All I can say is that among the atheists I know the majority group is the opposite of what you're claiming.


Which is how I should've voiced my opinion, save that obviously our impressions are opposite.

IWYW,
— Aswad.




Aswad -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/8/2012 4:36:29 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

I really don't believe many atheists realize how hurtful those attacks are...at least I hope that is the case.


I don't find it hurtful.

I just shake my head and think "oh, well, I guess they'll have to repeat our mistakes to learn the lessons we learned". Well, that, and some general thoughts about humans being humans and religion having nothing to do with the evils of human history; those are quite adequately accounted for by human nature, to which such attacks merely add testaments. I fail to see the need for an extra entity in accounting for the worse sides of our nature, and one indeed seems to contradict the observations.

It's frustrating that humans aren't better than that, on the whole, but I remind myself that it will take millenia of evolution to get there.

IWYW,
— Aswad.




Aswad -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/8/2012 5:13:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Wow. I can't say that I've noticed an abundance of that - but, then, I don't have any sensitivities of a religious kind.


Around where I live, I noticed it even when I was an atheist myself.

Actually, it was particularly noticeable at the time, since I was hanging around more of them (and their boards), which showed me just how religion-invariant human prejudice and stupidity actually is. For instance, the Humanist society in Norway spends more time on bible studies and harping on Christians and Muslims than on ethics, charity and humanitarian matters, and I suspect (but don't know, as I've no interest in having a closer look) they probably spend more money on it, too. They've certainly spent quite a bit of money on the publication of anti-religious works that do nothing but mock (not even criticize) religion and religious people, but I've yet to see them do any reprints of Kant, Kierkegaard, etc., sponsor secular education, or in any other way really live better.

quote:

Perhaps this 'harshness' (want of a better word) from atheists here goes hand-in-hand with (what I see as) the harsh flavour of American religiousness in particular.


"It is better to have a thousand idiots attacking your views, than one idiot defending them." - Voltaire (thanks, Kirata).

When fundamentalists appear, they polarize, creating opposed fundamentalism. It's a thing.

quote:

In Britain, religion is, I think, something of a more taboo subject: the general feeling of 'so long as you don't ram it down my throat I'm fine with you' prevails.


Excepting self-identified atheists, that's the general feeling in Norway, as well.

By contrast, among atheists here, as far as I can tell, the general feeling is "6 billion people should be locked up in insane asylums, forcibly sterilized in case they escape, and denied basic human rights because they're too stupid to deserve them", and some are rather vocal about such things. Banning religion is a huge thing for them, and several have openly admitted to discrimination (e.g. stating they'd never hire anyone wearing a cross, because such a person must be insane, violent and mentally unstable).

Which is kind of ironic, since we have virtually no religious fundamentalism or extremism here, except for the jihadists (and they're more concerned with politics than religion). The bulk of our extremists are secular political extremists on the far left and the far right, mostly on the far left, though the far right has gained momentum after the Oslo/Utøya attacks last year (or, more precisely, after the way we as a state responded; as a people, we responded well, at first).

quote:

Politics and religion aren't intermarried to anywhere near the same extent; when they are, the results aren't usually such stridently authoritarian policy proposals.


Yeah, same here.

The Christian Conservative Party, for instance, supports LGBT rights, and though they oppose elective abortion, they do support it in cases of rape (including marital rape and social rape), when the mother's health is at risk, or when the foetus may not be viable, all of which are anchored in their more comprehensive right to life doctrine (e.g. opposition to the death penalty and support for making foreign aid conditional on abolishing the death penalty). The latter is also supported by sex education, family planning, access to contraception (free), extensive welfare measures, and so forth. They also emphasize minority rights, education, research, antidiscrimination laws, women's rights issues and so forth. One of their rising stars is openly lesbian.

That's as fundie as it gets in politics around here, and hardly comparable to what one sees in the USA.

Note also that we see them as fundie, and that the next generation is completely different; we'll probably see them supporting LGBT adoption in a few years (currently, they don't), for instance, seeing as their notion of conservativism isn't based on a fixed point in the long distant past, but rather slow change (i.e. giving people time to get used to new ideas).

quote:

Come to think of it, I recall being quite surprised when I first visited these forums even to see a forum headed 'Politics and Religion'. I'd never seen them put together in such a way before.


I guess the commonality is values.

IWYW,
— Aswad.




GotSteel -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/8/2012 6:51:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub
But you seem to assume all people of faith agree with the Akins of this world...


Nope, but you seem to assume my position without actually having read it. I get that all people of faith don't agree. ACTUALLY LISTEN TO ME, we all get that. I talk about that on a regular basis, heck here I am explaining that in this thread.

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel
quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr
One person, speaking for all the atheists?
Michael


That's what I'm saying.

Christianity has tens of thousands of different positions (which tazzy has a habit of denying are actually Christianity) and that's just Christianity a subcategory of theism. But for atheism non-atheists somehow get to decide that's not allowed [8|]


I think you and other theists in these threads would have a better understanding of what our positions actually are if you guys spent less time making our positions up for us.




Kirata -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/8/2012 7:24:06 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

you seem to assume my position without actually having read it...

And you seem to assume that anyone who thinks your position is bullshit hasn't listened to you.

K.




thompsonx -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/8/2012 8:27:33 AM)

quote:

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Just as 2+2=13 ain't so till you prove it.


If you fail to see the shortcomings of that comparison, I shan't bore you with the details.

Is that code for" you lack the intellectual capacity to explane your position?"




Kirata -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/8/2012 8:46:11 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Just as 2+2=13 ain't so till you prove it.

It's not a matter of "proof," it's a matter of definition.

If our numerical system mapped the double-bump symbol "3" to the concept "two," the squiggly "2" to the concept "four," and the jaggy "7" to the concept "eight", then it would be perfectly correct to write: 2 + 2 = 7, and 7 / 3 = 2.

K.




kdsub -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/8/2012 9:25:00 AM)

quote:

Well, that, and some general thoughts about humans being humans and religion having nothing to do with the evils of human history; those are quite adequately accounted for by human nature, to which such attacks merely add testaments.


This thought has been my personal crusade here on cm for sometime. I'm afraid it has only fallen on deaf ears and blind eyes.

Butch




kdsub -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/8/2012 9:28:28 AM)

quote:

ACTUALLY LISTEN TO ME


Over this thread and others your words do indeed speak for you.

Butch




Aswad -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/8/2012 9:42:56 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Is that code for" you lack the intellectual capacity to explane your position?"


No, it's a polite version of "fuck it, this ain't worth the effort" (give or take), though it does cover other meanings, as well.

If you care to grasp my position, work on it; it'll come to you. If not, settle for what you got.

Really, I was just walking away from you, no need to overinterpret it.

IWYW,
— Aswad.




Aswad -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/8/2012 9:44:51 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

This thought has been my personal crusade here on cm for sometime. I'm afraid it has only fallen on deaf ears and blind eyes.


Welcome to Jesus' world.

If you haven't already, go back and reread the NT with that in mind.

IWYW,
— Aswad.




thompsonx -> RE: Now God intended rape to happen. (11/8/2012 10:17:01 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Just as 2+2=13 ain't so till you prove it.

It's not a matter of "proof," it's a matter of definition.

If our numerical system mapped the double-bump symbol "3" to the concept "two," the squiggly "2" to the concept "four," and the jaggy "7" to the concept "eight", then it would be perfectly correct to write: 2 + 2 = 7, and 7 / 3 = 2.

K.



Agreed ...but given that we have agreed to the definition in general use then proof by that definition was my point.




Page: <<   < prev  25 26 [27] 28 29   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875