RE: Rasmussen Electoral College Scoreboard

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Rasmussen Electoral College Scoreboard

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Rasmussen Electoral College Scoreboard

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Rasmussen Electoral College Scoreboard - 10/27/2012 9:42:49 AM

tazzygirl

Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

hahahaha... yeah... didnt think You would understand. Thats what I am saying. They use the polls for those states.

The only two that do not have multiple recent polls - multiple as in more than one poll recently form ONLY one source - Are Arizona and Oregon.

Are you saying Arizona's is correct, but Oregon's is not? After all, Arizona is projected to go to Romney...

And here are their polls...

RCP Average 9/25 - 10/10 -- -- 48.3 43.0 Romney +5.3
Behavior Research Center* 10/4 - 10/10 LV 4.4 42 44 Obama +2
PPP (D) 10/1 - 10/3 595 LV 4.0 53 44 Romney +9
HighGround/Moore (R)* 9/25 - 9/26 500 LV 4.0 46 42 Romney +4
Rasmussen Reports 9/25 - 9/25 500 LV 4.5 52 42 Romney +10

Not doing much for your argument there.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to subrob1967)

Profile

Post #: 21

RE: Rasmussen Electoral College Scoreboard - 10/27/2012 9:52:13 AM

Owner59

Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline

I`m not sure if our more delirious cons know it,but quoting a Rassie-poll that supports their contention in one state,then dismissing the SAME polling company`s poll in another state...........makes them look kinda dumb and desparate....

Tazzy and Lucy have been particularly honest and careful about the polls and what they mean.

< Message edited by Owner59 -- 10/27/2012 9:55:01 AM >

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to tazzygirl)

Profile

Post #: 22

RE: Rasmussen Electoral College Scoreboard - 10/27/2012 9:59:29 AM

Aylee

Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: erieangel

The right wing has been going ape shit over Nate Silver.

His computer model has consistently given Obama the win by a wide margin--except right after the first debate where Obama chances of winning dipped near 60%.

Except he is using 2008 in his models and 2008 was an outlier.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to erieangel)

Profile

Post #: 23

RE: Rasmussen Electoral College Scoreboard - 10/27/2012 10:21:40 AM

Owner59

Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline

John "not everyone should be allowed to vote" Stossel is part of Rasmussen.....

They are right leaning and consistently so, by about two points.

Their trends have matched the average trends almost like a mirror....durring the whole cycle....but always with the righty about two points ahead.

In other words.....when they say a state is going to the President......the cons are freaking the fuck out and/or giving up there.

< Message edited by Owner59 -- 10/27/2012 10:22:58 AM >

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to Aylee)

Profile

Post #: 24

RE: Rasmussen Electoral College Scoreboard - 10/27/2012 1:32:59 PM

DomKen

Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

quote:

ORIGINAL: erieangel

The right wing has been going ape shit over Nate Silver.

His computer model has consistently given Obama the win by a wide margin--except right after the first debate where Obama chances of winning dipped near 60%.

Except he is using 2008 in his models and 2008 was an outlier.