SherriA
Posts: 544
Joined: 1/1/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: trnmastr Heres an example: When at an event some Doms may tell their subs not to look or talk to others, let alone touch anyone. Someone walks up to her, starts a conversation or even attempts to shake her hand. Well if any of this happens, if she makes eye contact, if she says a word if he touches her guess who gets into trouble? I think that it's incumbent on the dominant to give his/her partner the tools to deal with these situations, if they can reasonably be expected to happen. I've seen various ways of dealing with it, from simple to really creative. Unless you (generic you) intend to set someone up to fail, it seems only natural that you'd set out guidelines for these types of situations, particularly if you had any sense that your partner wasn't going to be able to deal with them on his/her own. It's not the fault of the other folks at the event, if they don't know what games you're (again, generic you) playing. The associated protocols vary much too widely to expect others who haven't been forewarned to know what's appropriate for the people in question. If you're going to set up this type of situation, shouldn't it also be your responsibility to plan for these types of potential problems? JMNSHO, of course. For me, a collar is simply a fashion accessory. If i'm wearing one, it's because it looks hot with my outfit. So what do I know? -- Sherri
< Message edited by SherriA -- 1/28/2004 12:20:12 AM >
_____________________________
-- Sherri Fighting for peace is like fucking for virginity.
|