DaddySatyr
Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011 From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ToyOfRhamnusia Exactly, JanahX - it is a human rights issue. NO ONE but the woman herself should be given any powers over what is to happen with HER body, as long as she does not expect anyone who disagrees with her decisions to be forced to be part of carrying them out. It is really so damned simple. All talk about calling a fetus "a human" is for this reason alone: It creates a situation of potential conflicts with the woman who carries the fetus. It is IMPOSSIBLE to assign any rights to the fetus without VIOLATING the woman's rights! So, what is most important? Protecting a woman's rights - or to create a serious hole in the fundamental principles of our human rights? "Pro life" is a false nomenclature for some elected/appointed officials taking over control of first a pregnant woman's body, then the bodies of all women, and guaranteed also the bodies of all men! The aim is complete slavery for all of us! It's amazing that people can't see this - or truly can and THEN still want to support that shit... And "Pro choice" is ...? What? NOT a false nomenclature? It's the position that a growing, developing human being can be terminated at the whim of a woman who wasn't alone in helping that life to be created. It would also be more accurately labeled: "Pro Feticide". Sorry but no matter which side of the aisle you're on, barring nature forcing the issue, we're discussing ending human life on some level. It's that basic. Who has the right to decide which humans live and which humans die? Me? You? The person carrying the life or the person who helped to plant the seed? Both? The government? On one level, I'd like the authority to decide who lives and who dies but, I think the people I don't deem worthy of life would have an issue. Who speaks for the father or the un-born child? Does that life growing inside her have absolutely no rights? None? If that's the case, then why can't a man that doesn't want to be a father and fears 25 years of child support kick her in the stomach with impugnity? It's only a blastocyte, right? Not important, at all. I don't necessartily want government making choices about who lives and who dies but if one of the people responsible for creating that life want to parent that child, why are they denied that ability? It's her body? Fine then it's her responsibility to prevent pregnancy (and I support birth control whole-heartedly). If it is her responsibility to prevent it and she fails, she has a responsibility to that life and to her partner in creating that life. Peace and comfort, Michael
< Message edited by DaddySatyr -- 10/29/2012 5:59:50 AM >
_____________________________
A Stone in My Shoe Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me? "For that which I love, I will do horrible things"
|