Suleiman -> RE: Finances (11/5/2004 4:46:42 PM)
|
I consider this to be a core aspect of "noblesse oblige". I do not expect my concept of responsibility to echo anywhere except within the cavernous expanse of my own skull, but to my mind, if I am not able to support an additional person in my household, I have no right to lay claim to them as personal property. Institutional slavery in ancient times, and still today in some parts of the world, includes a concept of patronage as part of the duties and responsibilities of a slave owner. I would expect to be able to meet the basic needs of any slave I owned, but I would also consider it my right and duty to ensure their own ability to survive in the world outside. Some people, however, are basically homemakers. I most certianly am, and when I was in a 24/7, this was something that my owner recognised and acknowledged. She also actively pushed me to become an author, and her encouragement is part of why I now laughably call writing my career. Yes, many try to become a "slave" or "pet" as a way of avoiding responsibility. Slackers are slackers, and can be found in every community. I have not lain any judgement on anyone else's criteria, nor do I believe that merc did. From my point of view, it is a moral, ethical, and philosophical standard that I hold myself to as part of who I am. If I can not hold true to that inner belief, I wouldn't be much of a master, would I? We all make our choices, I have made mine, and I answered accordingly.
|
|
|
|