DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: cloudboy From today's NYT: What Mr. Romney cannot admit is that all this (recovery of GM and Chrysler; saving 1.5M jobs) is a direct result of the government investment he would have rejected. It’s bad enough to be wrong on the policy. It takes an especially dishonest candidate to simply turn up the volume on a lie (President Obama sold Chrysler to Italians who are going to build Jeeps in China) and keep repeating it. By doing that in a flailing, last-minute grab for Ohio, Mr. Romney is providing a grim preview of what kind of president he would be. What part of that is wrong, other than that they are going to build Jeeps in China (which is only partially wrong)? Who owns Chrysler? Fiat owns majority stake in Chrysler. Chrysler was sold to the Italians. Are they going to be building Jeeps in China? Maybe. Maybe not. They are looking at building Jeeps in China (would actually be a resumption of building Jeeps in China), but those would be for that Market. And, they have done some research into building the breadth of their lines in China, too. They are not close to building the entirety of their line in China. The Jeep line is the only one they seem to be close on. And, what is really the part that Romney got wrong, they aren't moving all their production over there, just production for that market. Romney did, indeed, disagree with the auto-bailout, though he did not disagree with the Government having no part in saving Chrysler or GM.
_____________________________
What I support: - A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
- Personal Responsibility
- Help for the truly needy
- Limited Government
- Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
|