freedomdwarf1
Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 Does an inert building actually do that?? My emphasis was on the enhancement of the volume of the communication. One sole individual gains just as much as a group of like-minded individuals. I don't agree that more people make it any more of an enhancement. I also don't agree that a higher 'volume' is any better than a lone voice. Try telling that to the monks that devote their lives to their god and live a solitary life. quote:
ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 It certainly doesn't in my experience. If you believed, your experience might differ. I DO believe! But I just don't follow your god. A building is just a building. No more, no less. And yes, I have worshipped in a group as well as an individual. A true follower of any faith does not need the support of others to make that following any 'better'. quote:
ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 How many Pagan gods do you think there are?? I gather that you are referring to the comtemporary idiots who call themselves pagan? I was not. Then why make a sweeping statement that there are many Pagan gods. Even to the extent of explaining that you have local gathering places where there are are such things as 'local' Pagan gods to worship! quote:
ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 Or are you confusing the many gods of various religions as 'Pagan'?? I was referring to such people as Odin, Krishna, Horus and Hera and such. They are not Pagans. quote:
ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 In Pagan society, there is no such thing as a 'local' god I gather that you are once again referring to the people who these days call themselves pagan. Then perhaps you are thinking that those not following your religion call themselves 'Pagan'. Most don't call themselves Pagan unless they are. That is a very blinkered view. quote:
ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 Civilisation has nothing to do with religion. I note that ignorance requires lecturing. It is not ignorance. Only those that think civilisation is religious-based require re-education :) The concept of being 'civilised' has nothing to do with religion whatsoever. Main Entry:civ£il Pronunciation:*si-v*l Function:adjective Etymology:Middle English, from Middle French, from Latin civilis, from civis Date:14th century 1 a : of or relating to citizens b : of or relating to the state or its citizenry *civil strife* 2 a : CIVILIZED *civil society* b : adequate in courtesy and politeness : MANNERLY *a civil question* 3 a : of, relating to, or based on civil law b : relating to private rights and to remedies sought by action or suit distinct from criminal proceedings c : established by law 4 : of, relating to, or involving the general public, their activities, needs, or ways, or civic affairs as distinguished from special (as military or religious) affairs 5 of time : based on the mean sun and legally recognized for use in ordinary affairs synonyms CIVIL, POLITE, COURTEOUS, GALLANT, CHIVALROUS mean observant of the forms required by good breeding. CIVIL often suggests little more than the avoidance of overt rudeness *owed the questioner a civil reply*. POLITE commonly implies polish of speech and manners and sometimes suggests an absence of cordiality *if you can't be pleasant, at least be polite*. COURTEOUS implies more actively considerate or dignified politeness *clerks who were unfailingly courteous to customers*. GALLANT and CHIVALROUS imply courteous attentiveness especially to women. GALLANT suggests spirited and dashing behavior and ornate expressions of courtesy *a gallant suitor of the old school*. CHIVALROUS suggests high-minded and self-sacrificing behavior *a chivalrous display of duty*. Note specifically point 4 - "...as distinguished from special (as military or religious) affairs" So perhaps it is YOU that is need of a lecture?? ;) quote:
ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 In my world, there is no such being as The Divine. That is allowed. The Divine, being indifferent to the antics of man and bacterium, does not hold that against you. Whatever. I don't believe such a thing exists except in the minds of weak-willed people that need leadership. quote:
ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 It was invented to focus the mind and attention of those that needed such an ethereal being. It was not invented. It most certain was!! It never existed until the 'christian' religion was 'invented' by man just over 2 millenia ago. quote:
ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 I see no good purpose for a church other than to shelter from the rain or to indoctrinate it's blind followers. Okay. So build me a church - and I will indoctrinate you drily. I have my faith - I don't need anothers' blinkered view of the world, thanks. Oh, and my faith doesn't need a special building to worship either! ;) quote:
ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 No, I don't hear you because false words fall on deaf ears :) Neither do deaf ears hear true words. I don't believe that anything that is so pious, intolerant and blinkered in it's belief structure is worth listening to. So to me, they are definitely NOT true words. quote:
ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 Spock! :D Indeed: he prayed for you. Spock did not pray :D As did I. Don't waste your tiny little bewildered brain cells on the likes of me who know that tolerance is far superior than you appear to be able to comprehend. You are so indoctrinated in your little box you just cannot think outside of it. You and a certain other are so intolerant that you cannot accept that there is anything else beyong your closeted walls. Your whole set of responses clearly show you are not worthy of your following. And to re-enforce something that mnottertail said, it is your religion that are harbouring the most kiddie-fiddlers on the face of this planet. That is surely the most henious of all crimes of modern society. When they get found out they just get relocated to another unsuspecting community to continue their hideous crimes. Unless someone is brave enough to blow it out into the open, that's how your 'leaders' deal with it. That to me is nothing worth having in whatever group I chose to belong and that is why the support for your faith is steadilly dwindling. I would certainly not want any part of it.
< Message edited by freedomdwarf1 -- 11/12/2012 12:50:46 PM >
|