RE: Eye Candy (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity



Message

tazzygirl -> RE: Eye Candy (6/30/2013 2:16:02 PM)

They do here too .... I have seen many I wont post because I either could not verify the site they came from as to the age of the models or the information of the model themselves. Hell, I thought most of us did that. Guess I was wrong.



Hillwilliam -> RE: Eye Candy (7/1/2013 5:54:07 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

They do here too .... I have seen many I wont post because I either could not verify the site they came from as to the age of the models or the information of the model themselves. Hell, I thought most of us did that. Guess I was wrong.

No, you weren't wrong.
You might notice that the person said "Appeared" to be underage.

Hell, I can go find nudes of women who were pushing 30 when the photo was shot and prove their age from multiple sources but they LOOK young.

Case in point.
based on wiki biographical data and the copyright on the photo, the model was 28 when this was taken.



[image]local://upfiles/664494/CFB2CB4DE1A74F43AA3F381D8269283D.jpg[/image]



tazzygirl -> RE: Eye Candy (7/1/2013 5:57:45 AM)

I would not have taken her for being underage.



Hillwilliam -> RE: Eye Candy (7/1/2013 6:02:55 AM)

I can pull pics taken in her mid 20's where some people would.
This whole debate is beginning to resemble the "Daddydoms are really just closeted pedophiles" one we had a few months ago in General BDSM.



jlf1961 -> RE: Eye Candy (7/1/2013 6:11:52 AM)

Personally I prefer small breasted women.

However, it seems that the older a model is, the higher the chance they have had some "enhancements" and some of these ladies have gone the extreme of having breasts that appear to belong to a 7 or 8 foot tall woman.

Once a woman goes past a D cup, for me anyway, it is no longer attractive.



LanceHughes -> RE: Eye Candy (7/2/2013 12:49:23 PM)

OKAY. Let's stop the drift... especially since we went there already, right?

[image]http://media-cache-ec3.pinimg.com/192x/58/a4/9a/58a49a2f66be1a7bfec2a859f64b6c1b.jpg[/image]



jlf1961 -> RE: Eye Candy (7/2/2013 12:54:19 PM)

I am not sure if these are surgically enhanced or natural. Of course Heidi Montag once stated she was going to stop with breast enhancements once she reached a triple K cup size.

[image]local://upfiles/622970/559ACA60976F4785B479BB0898E8FFE2.jpg[/image]

[image]local://upfiles/622970/BF78AF71CFE245018A7BF0234FAAD19C.jpg[/image]



goodgirlmary -> RE: Eye Candy (7/2/2013 12:57:57 PM)

Eek.looks uncomfy



LanceHughes -> RE: Eye Candy (7/2/2013 1:10:50 PM)

Those shots belong in train wreck, y'think?



jlf1961 -> RE: Eye Candy (7/2/2013 1:35:50 PM)

Not sure lance, the pictures of women with small breasts were called "near child porn" soooooooo



tiggerspoohbear -> RE: Eye Candy (7/2/2013 7:40:54 PM)

.

[image]local://upfiles/1028154/3B3D15C91C5441A1B897E7872C26E917.jpg[/image]



tiggerspoohbear -> RE: Eye Candy (7/2/2013 7:42:07 PM)

.

[image]local://upfiles/1028154/1694D49C08104B2A937D2D06EC9246D5.jpg[/image]



hlen5 -> RE: Eye Candy (7/2/2013 10:10:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

I am not sure if these are surgically enhanced or natural. Of course Heidi Montag once stated she was going to stop with breast enhancements once she reached a triple K cup size.

[image]local://upfiles/622970/559ACA60976F4785B479BB0898E8FFE2.jpg[/image]



This looks like those women who get some synthetic fiber implants and the breasts grow to ginormous size as they are reacting to an irritant.



LanceHughes -> RE: Eye Candy (7/3/2013 9:38:38 AM)

Since this string is "Eye CANDY," and since we need a bit of "red, white, n' blue" for the FOURTH, thought this might help inspire the rest of you to be equally, er, um..... patriotic... Yep, that's the right word... PATRIOTIC!!!

[image]http://cdn03.cdn.socialitelife.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/15/nyc-firefighters-2013-calendar-photos-08152012-15-435x580.jpg[/image]



VideoAdminChi -> RE: Eye Candy (7/3/2013 10:27:46 AM)

quote:

Another photo that is in blatant disregard of the TOS, it is a school girl in a private school uniform.


That's not a real uniform and she looks over 18 to me, but I suggest you not blatantly disregard TOS.

[sm=adminwatch.gif]



LanceHughes -> RE: Eye Candy (7/3/2013 10:46:29 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: VideoAdminChi

quote:

Another photo that is in blatant disregard of the TOS, it is a school girl in a private school uniform.


That's not a real uniform and she looks over 18 to me, but I suggest you not blatantly disregard TOS.

[sm=adminwatch.gif]

When he said, "blatant disregard of the TOS" I think he was being sarcastic, y'know?



LanceHughes -> RE: Eye Candy (7/3/2013 10:48:56 AM)

Chi;
If you're watching this thread, can you get those "big breast" photos PULLED? Pretty please?
I appreciate the fine female form, but those are WAAAAAaaaayyyy off the topic of "eye-candy."
Off-topic IS a TOS violation, right?
Regards, Lance



Hillwilliam -> RE: Eye Candy (7/3/2013 10:50:33 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LanceHughes

Chi;
If you're watching this thread, can you get those "big breast" photos PULLED? Pretty please?
I appreciate the fine female form, but those are WAAAAAaaaayyyy off the topic of "eye-candy."
Regards, Lance

It looks like they've already be thoroughly pulled.............or something. [:'(]



LanceHughes -> RE: Eye Candy (7/3/2013 10:52:34 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: LanceHughes

Chi;
If you're watching this thread, can you get those "big breast" photos PULLED? Pretty please?
I appreciate the fine female form, but those are WAAAAAaaaayyyy off the topic of "eye-candy."
Regards, Lance

It looks like they've already be thoroughly pulled.............or something. [:'(]

I still see 'em at 1187 and 1193.
Yes, I re-loaded. Even signed-out and in.



Hillwilliam -> RE: Eye Candy (7/3/2013 10:59:13 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LanceHughes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: LanceHughes

Chi;
If you're watching this thread, can you get those "big breast" photos PULLED? Pretty please?
I appreciate the fine female form, but those are WAAAAAaaaayyyy off the topic of "eye-candy."
Regards, Lance

It looks like they've already be thoroughly pulled.............or something. [:'(]

I still see 'em at 1187 and 1193.
Yes, I re-loaded. Even signed-out and in.

Sorry lance, My snarkometer is off today.
I meant the alterations to them.



Page: <<   < prev  58 59 [60] 61 62   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625