DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: graceadieu quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote:
ORIGINAL: graceadieu quote:
ORIGINAL: Yachtie The real danger is in that the left assumes that those who do not want as they do will quietly acquiesce. ....? We live in a democracy, in case you've forgotten. Majority rule. If your party loses, then you suck it up and try again next time. And if you win then, your opponent needs to step down gracefully and accept that, too. If the response to losing an election is for the losers to take up arms and forcibly refuse to accept the outcome, that's the end of democracy in this country. Our form of government only works because we've all agreed not to do that kind of thing. Just a point of order here... we live in a republic, not a democracy. We are not simply a "majority rules," or "winner take all" system. The secession kick isn't about losing an election, it's about the perception that the America of the US Constitution is being lost. The America of the US Constitution is something to take up arms and forcibly protect. And what, exactly, is "the America of the US Constitution"? The one where blacks are 3/5 of a person and only white male property owners can vote? Really? You want to go there? Sheesh. Get over it already. The Constitution has been amended to correct a terrible act that was only allowed as a compromise. quote:
The Constitution and Bill of Rights are living documents, open to interpretation. How they're interpreted by the Supreme Court and followed by Congress and the Executive branch have been changing and evolving for over 200 years, as the world changes and new challenges and questions arise. Getting up in arms now because our government and laws aren't the same as they were in 1789 is absurd. "Living" document? Not really. Amendable? Certainly. Was it designed to be changed simply by changing interpretation? I highly doubt it. Basing a system of laws on something that can be changed simply by time's alteration of word usage is probably one of the dumbest ideas ever. It's like the little pig that build his house on a sand foundation. Too shifty to stand the test of time. When is it not absurd to get up in arms if government isn't playing by the rules set to limit it? Is it simply "throw your hands up in the air and let it go because it's been happening, so it may as well not be stopped?" It's a good thing the colonials didn't view the British governors that way. Regardless of how the times change, the US Constitution can be followed according to the original interpretations of how it was written (including the Amendments since passed).
_____________________________
What I support: - A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
- Personal Responsibility
- Help for the truly needy
- Limited Government
- Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
|