|
Fightdirecto -> Obamaphobe "secession" & "armed rebellion" movements (11/13/2012 10:24:45 AM)
|
Obamaphobe petitions
quote:
Peacefully grant the State of //Fill in the blank// to withdraw from the United States of America and create its own NEW government.
We the people of the great state of //Fill in the blank// , do see that in today's world the Federal Government has not led our citizens justly and with honor. We therefore as free men and women of our great state do believe that it is time to take matter upon ourselves to ensure our continued freedom, and to enact our own laws and here buy govern ourselves without the federal government's involvement in our internal matters from this day forward.
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Benjamin Franklin: 1775
Virginia Republicans Call for Armed Revolution if Obama Wins in November
quote:
During the healthcare reform debate, angry teabaggers cited Jefferson’s line that “a little rebellion, now and then, is a good thing,” as proof that revolution against government tyranny was advocated by a Founding Father as an option in 2009, and that sentiment has not diminished three years later heading into a general election. The groups claiming President Obama is a tyrannical leader have never given one example of tyranny, but they, with the GOP’s assistance, have whipped themselves into frenzy and openly called for armed insurrection against the United States government. One may be inclined to excuse talk of rebellion as angry rhetoric from a fringe element in the tea party, but a Virginia Republican Committee newsletter has called for armed revolution if President Obama is re-elected in November...
According to the newsletter, President Obama, is a “political socialist ideologue unlike anything world history has ever witnessed or recognized,” and that the only option is “armed revolution should we fail with the power of the vote in November:” If one is confused as to what Republicans consider is a “political socialist ideologue,” the newsletter claims President Obama “shuns biblical praise, handicaps economic ability, disrespects the honor of earned military might,” and that under Obama, “the government is out of control, and this opportunity, must not be forsaken for we shall not have any coarse (sic) but armed revolution.”...
All of the threats of armed revolution have as their basis one simple fact; the President is not a white man...The truth is that it does not matter which white man should be president, it just cannot be an African American, and if voters elect President Obama to a second term, they are seriously considering an armed rebellion.
FetLife Forums
quote:
Clayman4fire:
If there were a [civil] war the military would not side with Obama after the fiasco with our ambassador and leaving the American contingent hanging. The military has a code of conduct and support their own when in harms way. They look with contempt upon individuals or agencies who sit on their hands while good men take action and die and later make excuses for ineptness or political expediencies.
The primary stupidity, IMO, of the petitioners and also those who have spoken wistfully of an actual armed "revolution" is their mistaken belief that the majority of the American people agree with them and the majority of the American people (to include all the members of the actice duty United States military) would join them or support them.
The majority of Hispanic voters, for example, voted to re-elect President Obama. Do the Obamaphobe "revolutionaries" or Obamaphobe secessionists honestly believe that these Hispanic voters would not defend their homes and their country from Obamaphobe "revolutionaries" or Obamaphobe secessionists?
|
|
|
|
