RE: Hypocrisy.....a tale of two Rice's

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Hypocrisy.....a tale of two Rice's

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Hypocrisy.....a tale of two Rice's

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Hypocrisy.....a tale of two Rice's - 11/16/2012 4:39:53 PM

Politesub53

Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

Yes and I've shown (recently) that Ofailure fits all four qualifications. The only people that don't see it are those that are so blind they refuse to see.

Peace and comfort,

Michael

You could always vote him out in the next election huh ! Oh wait, you guys tried that with this continuous "socialist" bullshit and the electorate rejected the notion.

Tick tock 2016

(in reply to DaddySatyr)

Profile

Post #: 41

RE: Hypocrisy.....a tale of two Rice's - 11/16/2012 5:11:11 PM

LookieNoNookie

Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
You call him a socialist because the media you choose to parrot calls him a socialist.
Please look up the definition of "Socialist" prior to the consumption of your daily Kool-Aid dosage.

Sorry, buddy. I've been calling him a socialist for years. He stinks of it; from the first time he talked about redistribution to when he cried to the SCOTUS that his attempt at government takeover of a large portion of the GDP was a "tax". He's a pinko and has been for a long time.

Utter nonsense.

Redistribution of wealth is what progressive tazation is all about. Therefore by your criteria Abraham Lincoln was a socialist.

There has been no government takeover of a large part of the GDP. There has been a set of rather mild health insurance regulations passed. No socialist would ever force the majority of his country to participate in the market, the idea is simply absurd.

Maybe it's just me but...I'm thinking Lincoln is dead and we're no longer living under his current policies.

(in reply to DomKen)

Profile

Post #: 42

RE: Hypocrisy.....a tale of two Rice's - 11/16/2012 5:21:32 PM

slvemike4u

Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline

Lincoln is dead ?
WTF ,when did this happen ?

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4

(in reply to LookieNoNookie)

Profile

Post #: 43

RE: Hypocrisy.....a tale of two Rice's - 11/16/2012 5:44:29 PM

DomKen

Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
You call him a socialist because the media you choose to parrot calls him a socialist.
Please look up the definition of "Socialist" prior to the consumption of your daily Kool-Aid dosage.

Sorry, buddy. I've been calling him a socialist for years. He stinks of it; from the first time he talked about redistribution to when he cried to the SCOTUS that his attempt at government takeover of a large portion of the GDP was a "tax". He's a pinko and has been for a long time.

Utter nonsense.

Redistribution of wealth is what progressive tazation is all about. Therefore by your criteria Abraham Lincoln was a socialist.

There has been no government takeover of a large part of the GDP. There has been a set of rather mild health insurance regulations passed. No socialist would ever force the majority of his country to participate in the market, the idea is simply absurd.

Maybe it's just me but...I'm thinking Lincoln is dead and we're no longer living under his current policies.

So? The question is is the claim that wealth redistribution is inherently socialist wrong? Was Lincoln as socialist or not?

< Message edited by DomKen -- 11/16/2012 5:45:47 PM >

(in reply to LookieNoNookie)

Profile

Post #: 44

RE: Hypocrisy.....a tale of two Rice's - 11/16/2012 7:20:57 PM

erieangel

Posts: 2237
Joined: 6/19/2011
Status: offline

I'm a socialist and I'm telling you Obama is far from a socialist.

But hey, everybody who calls Obama a socialist fails to recognize that we have a mixed economy anyway. There is a lot socialist policies in our economy. Social Security has the word right in it. Everything the public does is socialist. Fund highways? Socialist. Public schools? Socialist. Corporate welfare, bailouts and tax incentives to companies? All socialist. The tax breaks to oil companies the republicans love so much? Socialist. Police, fire, Homeland security, FBI, CIA (along with all the alphabet agencies). Socialist.

(in reply to DomKen)

Profile

Post #: 45

RE: Hypocrisy.....a tale of two Rice's - 11/16/2012 9:21:53 PM

Edwynn

Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

Hill, you've been decidedly edgy for a couple of months now. You've never been a name-caller before. Please, don't devolve into it, now?

You mean, like this?

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

To be fair to the socialist currently in office;

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

... it looks like president Ofailure has only ...

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

This liar has been ...

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

... and I've shown (recently) that Ofailure fits all four qualifications.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

He's a pinko ...

Yeah Hill, what's with all the name-calling here?

(in reply to DaddySatyr)

Profile

Post #: 46

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Hypocrisy.....a tale of two Rice's

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Jump to:

New Messages	No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages	Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages	Locked w/o New Messages

Post New Thread

Reply to Message

Post New Poll

Submit Vote

Delete My Own Post

Delete My Own Thread

Rate Posts

Spam Policy

0.063