CynthiaWVirginia
Posts: 1915
Joined: 2/28/2010 From: West Virginia, USA Status: offline
|
If there was no allergy nor red spots, didn't endanger him in any way, it would probably hit me hard that he was rejecting a symbol of our relationship. Kind of like marrying a man who refuses to wear a wedding ring (when wearing a ring would not endanger him in any way). Since my father was such a whore (he even boffed one of my babysitters, the lady who lived upstairs in our duplex), having a guy who wants to be my marked territory does something for me. In some illogical way, it helps to heal some of my trust issues somewhat. After being raised by my father it was hard to have faith in any man being faithful. To my knowledge, nobody I was ever with cheated on me...but part of me expected it to happen (men are just men was my attitude) and I expected not to look too closely into what he was up to...and to deny it to myself in a million different ways if I ended up with a mate who was a cheater. This is just childhood expectations that are hard to shake off, my apologies if any of the male population is insulted. It's more than a sexual turnon. It pleases the hell out of me to be with a guy who is so blatantly mine...and yes, it is mind altering...to experience that wide eyed wonder that I should have felt as a child. It's like spending a lifetime scoffing at Santa Claus...and then finding out that he is real and that magic exists. Sometimes through talking...things like necklaces/collars can take on a deeper significance. My boy and I are lucky to be the same in this; symbols of claiming and being claimed does something for both of us. He wears a chainmail collar, chainmail bracelets and ankle bracelets 24/7. When people ask about them, he could shrug them off as helping with arthritis (some of the links are copper), but most of the time he feels free to tell them that his girlfriend owns him and has the only keys to the lock. (I wouldn't make him walk around with some huge dog collar 24/7 or wear something that hurt, restricted his neck movement or triggered PTSD.) If someone couldn't proudly wear some symbol of our D/s relationship, as in a necklace, bracelet, anklet, ring, tattoo, piercing, then it would bother me. It's not enough that they "Suck it up, Butercup" and do as I ask while biting back their resentment. Nor would it be enough if they wore it just to humor me; a wedding ring wouldn't be a mere "decoration" on someone's hand. Whether on neck, finger, ankle, wrist, etc., neither should a collar. If it doesn't have meaning for both of us, it's false advertising.
|