YN
Posts: 699
Status: offline
|
Your press claims differently, regarding care quality, if true or not. More disturbing are the scandals regarding the "The Liverpool Care Pathway" - quote:
The Liverpool Care Pathway, (LCP), is in widespread use in the UK. It is flawed and dangerous. The Daily Telegraph has referred to it as the Death Pathway. There have been calls from victims families to have it banned. The old are particularly vulnerable because many of the so-called signs that are looked for to put a patient on the death pathway, such as frailty and declining mobility, are symptomatic of old-age in any case. In fact, age is one of the factors also taken into consideration in putting the patient on the LCP! This petition is to call for its withdrawal. Every patient is an individual and deserves that individual consideration of their condition. As it stands, anyone who falls into the clutches of the proponents of LCP and ticks all the boxes will be given assisted passage into the next world care of the NHS. This will apply particularly to the elderly who are, in any case, already suffering from that most terminal of all conditions - Old-Age! This will apply even contrary to the expressed wishes of patient and family, as this family has discovered. According to Dr Peter Hargreaves, Consultant in Palliative Medicine, P. H. Millard, Emeritus Professor of Geriatrics University of London and others, in the year 2007-2008 alone, 16.5 per cent of deaths came about after terminal sedation through the, quote, disturbing blanket application of the Liverpool Care Pathway being rolled out across the NHS in the UK. http://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/ban-the-liverpool-care-pathway-a-national-scandal Sedating a person and then starving them until they die is regarded as murder in most countries. Even treating a dog in such a manner would result in well merited criminality in most places. That this is done on the word of functionaries, and reportedly without the consent or infomation of either the patient or the family in certain cases is an outrage, and that your NHS supports this, and also pays bonus money it is claimed is a further outrage. Do you think the patients or their families would actually pay money for this euthanasia, or this would be legal in a health care system not governmentally run?
< Message edited by YN -- 11/18/2012 3:34:48 PM >
|